• 5 minutes China Faces Economic Collapse
  • 8 minutes ZeroHedge: Oil And Gas Bankruptcies To Accelerate As $137 Billion Debt Matures Over Next Two Years
  • 11 minutes Trump Will Win In 2020
  • 14 minutes Oil Production Growth In U.S. Grinds To A Halt
  • 2 hours The Belt & Road Initiative: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing?
  • 7 mins Drone attacks cause fire at two Saudi Aramco facilities, blaze now under control
  • 4 hours How OPEC and OECD play their role in setting oil price in light of Iranian oil sanction ?? Does the world agree with Iran's oil sanctions ???
  • 1 hour Cost of oil
  • 3 hours Democrats and Gun Views
  • 11 hours Swedish Behavioral Scientist Suggests Eating Humans to ‘Save the Planet’ from Climate Change. What could possibly go wrong?
  • 11 hours Trump Orders Biofuel Boost
  • 16 hours Buy Oil Monday?
  • 6 hours Iran says tanker oil sold at sea, buyer sets destination
  • 15 hours Used Thin Film Solar Panels at 15 Cents per Watt
  • 12 hours “Who’s going to bail out the Central Banks?”
  • 1 hour US and China are already in a full economic war and this battle for global hegemony is a little bit frightening
  • 15 hours Green New Deal Preview in Texas Town
Alt Text

Banks Battle For The Aramco IPO

The battle between investment banks…

Alt Text

The World's Largest IPO Is Ready To Go

Saudi Aramco appears to be…

David Blackmon

David Blackmon

David Blackmon is an independent energy analyst/consultant based in Mansfield, TX. David has enjoyed a 38-year career in the oil and gas industry, the last…

More Info

Premium Content

Who The Oil & Gas Industry Supports In 2020 US Elections

In the July 31 Democratic presidential debate, former Vice President Joe Biden gave this reponse to a question about whether he would continue to support the production of domestic coal, oil and natural gas resources: “No. We would work it out. We would make sure it’s eliminated, and no more subsidies for either one of those, period.” Note the word “eliminated.” Not limited, not regulated, not discouraged – eliminated.

In a speech on August 22, fellow candidate Bernie Sanders had this to say: "Fossil fuel executives should be criminally prosecuted for the destruction they have knowingly caused." Sanders could have said those executives “should” be prosecuted. He could have said they “might” be prosecuted.  Instead, reading from a pre-written script, he said they “should” be prosecuted. And not in a civil case, mind you, but “criminally” prosecuted.

These two blanket, pointed, unqualified statements by the two leading candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination raise the specter of an all-out war on the oil and gas industry during the next Democratic presidential administration, regardless of who that Democrat happens to be. This is especially true since every other candidate for the nomination has issued similar statements of hostility directed at fossil fuels.

Given the party’s near-unanimous adoption of various climate change plans based off of the “Green New Deal” proposed by Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, this really should come as no surprise to those who pay close attention to national politics.

But you can bet many industry executives, most of whom don’t pay close attention to national politics but pay employees whose job it is to do so, were somewhat taken aback by the Biden and Sanders statements. This would be especially true since industry executives as a class overwhelmingly supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 race based largely on the advice given to them by those employees. Related: Authorities Bust Illegal Crypto-Mining Lab In Nuclear Power Plant

The fact that neither Biden nor Sanders has made any effort to walk their comments back as of this writing raises a legitimate question about which party’s candidate these executives will support with hundreds of thousands of their personal dollars next year. In 2016, most were glad to support the Democrat nominee for a variety of reasons: Many did not approve of candidate Trump’s personal behavior in the past and present; many didn’t like his Tweets, a Trump practice that has only become amplified with time; and pretty much none of them believed Trump had any chance of winning, in part because that was what they were being advised by those employees they paid to pay attention to such things.

Luckily for them and their companies, President Trump didn’t hold a grudge. The Trump plan for “Energy Dominance” was and has continued to be a key centerpiece of his economic and international policy agenda, an agenda that he has aggressively implemented. Through a series of executive orders and regulatory actions too numerous to detail here, the Trump Administration done much to enable the ongoing domestic oil and natural gas boom, despite the industry’s failure to support his 2016 campaign in any meaningful way.

Now comes the 2020 campaign and another choice: Will these executives throw their support to the incumbent who has done so much to stimulate their industry even though they disapprove of his personality and tweets? Or will they once again pour large parts of their personal fortunes into the campaign of the nominee of a political party that seems to be hell-bent on putting their companies out of business?

An equally interesting question is what will the government affairs employees advise them to do this time around? From a logical standpoint, this would not seem to be a very difficult choice.

But hey, when has logic ever been determinative in the world of U.S. politics?

By David Blackmon for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • James Hilden-Minton on August 26 2019 said:
    You might check to see which candidates are willing to accept donations from people in the oil and gas industries. Some campaigns expressly do not want this support because it is so toxic.
  • Lee James on August 26 2019 said:
    I wish the Trump campaign would sharpen-up on its phrase, "Energy Dominance." I think what they intend is, "Fossil Fuel Dominance."

    The U.S. is currently positioning itself to follow behind other countries for clean energy. Our standing for clean energy includes being behind China.
  • Hugh Williams on August 27 2019 said:
    The sad part about this discussion is that the connection between global warming and human activity has not been established.
    Concurrence does not equal cause and effect. Scientific studies in Finland and Japan concluded that gravity and radiation are the causes not human activity. Results that disagree with the consensus are dismissed.
  • Roger Wilson on August 27 2019 said:
    Oil and Gas run the world. Period. Environmental issues are real, and the industries know this— perhaps as much as anyone because they NEED to know, it’s how they make their money. Slamming Oil and Gas is safe for Dems because they know the WORLDWIDE petro economy CAN’T change all that fast. So OK industry can send Senator Snowball to Washington, but the future points toward the emissions arrangements Ford BMW and VW have made w CA.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play