• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 17 hours Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 16 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 17 hours "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
  • 3 days Bankruptcy in the Industry
  • 7 hours Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 4 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Wall Street Loses Faith In Shale

Wall st

To Wall Street, the shale industry has lost a lot of its allure. A decade’s worth of promises have failed to materialize, and Big Finance is cutting some of its ties with smaller shale drillers who have not delivered.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the shale industry only saw $22 billion in new bond and equity deals, down by more than half from 2016 levels, which was a much worse time for the market.

The steep decline in new debt and equity issuance is a sign that major investors are no longer rushing to finance unprofitable shale drilling. It’s worth noting that this is a new development. For years Wall Street financed unprofitable drilling, holding out on the promise that rapid production growth would eventually pay off.

Shale wells suffer from precipitous decline rates, with as much as three quarters of a well’s total lifetime production coming out in the first year or two. After an initial burst of output, shale wells enter a steep decline.

Of course, this has been known since the beginning and Wall Street has long been fully aware. But major investors hoped that shale companies would scale up, achieve efficiencies and lower breakeven prices to the point that they could turn a profit.

However, that has not been the case. While there are some drillers that are profitable, taken as a whole the industry has been cash flow negative essentially since its beginning in the mid-2000s. For instance, the IEA estimates that the shale industry posted cumulative negative free cash flow of over $200 billion between 2010 and 2014. Related: China’s Supergrid Faces One Major Problem

The red ink has narrowed since then, but so too has the patience from Wall Street. In 2018, even as oil prices hit their highest levels in years, new debt and equity issuance plunged. That makes it harder for small and even medium-sized companies to finance growth. It’s not all that surprising, then, that a wave of spending cuts have cropped up in the last few months.

The WSJ notes that the credit environment also worsened when the market hit its nadir in 2016. Regulators tightened lending requirements, raising the cost of capital for indebted drillers. That, of course, made it even more difficult for these drillers to turn a profit.

To top it off, all of these pesky investors are much more demanding than they used to be, calling on companies to stop spending so much and instead return cash to shareholders. That leaves less capital available to inject back into the ground. Earlier this month Barclays issued a double-downgrade to Occidental Petroleum, lowering it from Overweight to Underweight, citing the company’s deficit after dividends at a time when the driller still expected to aim for an aggressive production target.

But some companies are between a rock and a hard place. The WSJ notes that CNX Resources has lost over 20 percent since late January when it announced that it was bowing to investor pressure to cut spending. That led to speculation that the company wouldn’t meet its production target. It’s a no-win situation for some.

What to make of all of this? As Liam Denning of Bloomberg Opinion put it, “[t]the prevailing financial model for many frackers has hit a wall.” Denning points out that the shale industry has not posted a return on capital above 10 percent any year since 2006, which says is a “feature of shale, not a bug.”

According to Rystad Energy, the 33 largest publicly-traded shale companies, accounting for 39 percent of U.S. shale output, will struggle to please shareholders while also trimming debt. “Shale E&Ps struggle to please equity investors and reduce leverage ratios simultaneously. Despite a significant deleverage last year, estimated 2019 free cash flow barely covers operator obligations, putting E&Ps on thin ice as future dividend payments remain in question,” Rystad Energy senior analyst Alisa Lukash said in a statement. Related: European Oil Demand Is Shockingly Weak

Taking a step back, explosive shale growth was only possible because in the context of the post-2008 financial crisis and the response by the Federal Reserve to drop interest rates close to zero, something Bethany McLean argues in her book, “Saudi America.” Cheap money financed the debt-fueled shale revolution.

Rystad finds that over half of the total debt pile for the 33 companies it analyzed is due within the next seven years. Ultimately, the industry may have to erase $4 billion in promised dividend payments. “The obvious gap in expected versus likely dividend payments confirms the industry’s inability to deliver sustained investors’ payback while simultaneously deleveraging,” Lukash said.


That doesn’t mean that production is going to fall off of a cliff. These days, the shale drilling frenzy is being pushed along increasingly by the oil majors, who have gobbled up smaller companies. ExxonMobil and Chevron, for instance, can take a long view, and put mountains of cash into drilling. Investor pressure is different for these multinationals and, in any event, they are much more profitable than smaller shale companies due to various assets in refining, chemicals, offshore and otherwise conventional production.

As such, production growth will continue for a while longer. But the go-go days are over.

By Nick Cunningham, Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Leo Kobrinsky on February 25 2019 said:
    In laymen language: Saudis were right about that shale revolution being fake. The same expert played the role of shale cheerleader for a long time. But now he looks like get amnesia.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on February 26 2019 said:
    I have always maintained that the US shale oil industry is one with diminishing returns and therefore will never be profitable. Since its actual inception in 2008, it has been in a vicious circle. It has to continue production to remain afloat and without borrowing it can’t continue to produce thus amassing huge debts estimated in hundreds of billions of dollars and being unable to pay meaningful dividends to its investors.

    The Achilles heel of the US shale oil industry is the steep depletion rate ranging from 70%-90% in the first year of production necessitating the drilling of some 10,000 new wells every year at an annual cost of $50 bn just to maintain production. That adds year after year to its fast-growing debts.

    Wall Street investors have been aware of this situation since the beginning of shale oil production. But major investors hoped that shale companies would scale up, achieve efficiencies and lower breakeven prices to the point that they could turn a profit. Moreover, investors are now calling on shale producers to stop spending so much and instead return cash to shareholders. That leaves less capital available to inject back into the ground. The shale oil revolution was only possible because cheap money in the aftermath of the post-2008 financial crisis financed the debt-fuelled shale revolution.

    And despite a spate of highly authoritative reports from credible sources of a slowdown in production in the Permian which is the best shale play in the United States and which accounts for 50%-60% of total US shale production, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) is projecting that US oil production will average 12.4 million barrels a day (mbd) in 2019 compared with 10.9 mbd in 2018 and averaging 13.2 mbd by 2020.

    The US shale oil industry could become a diminished presence in the global oil market if not a thing of the past within 5-10 years.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • aldo laghi on February 26 2019 said:
    how do you expalin then that
  • Rudolf Huber on February 28 2019 said:
    Remember the dot.com bubble around 2000? You should as it showed a dynamic that's at play in shale now. It stared with idealists who wanted to get something new to work, then the market picked it up and threw cash at everything that just smelled like a dot.com. The craziest, most ridiculous business concepts got millions based on a PowerPoint presentation. The feeding frenzy was in full swing when suddenly bang, it all collapsed in a pile of rubble. Many died, some survived, consolidated, remade themselves, kicked the game up a notch or more and went through the pain in order to become true giants. Amazon was one of them. They almost died at the time. Look at them now. Do you feel that they are close to dying? Shale must start to clean up its act. It will not do so willingly - it will do so when faced with oblivion. Many will wink out of existence but those that survive will put the game onto a totally different level. The Amazon of shale (and of oil&gas) is already out there, biting fingernails and fighting like hell. In 15 years it will have eclipsed companies like Shell and Exxon.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News