• 5 minutes Iran Says It Arrested 17 CIA Spies, Some Sentenced To Death
  • 9 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 13 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 2 hours Iran Loses $130,000,000 Oil Revenue Every Day They Continue Their Games . . . .Opportunity Lost . . . Will Never Get It Back. . . . . LOL .
  • 10 hours Oil Giant Saudi Arabia Is Set to Start First Wind-Power Plant
  • 4 hours How is E&P of Marginal Oil on the UKCS Similar to the Shale Oil Operations in the US?
  • 7 hours So You Think We’re Reducing Fossil Fuel? — Think Again
  • 1 hour Renewables provided only about 4% of total global energy needs in 2018
  • 5 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 8 hours EIA Reports Are Fraudulent : EIA Is Conspiring With Trump To Keep Oil Prices Low
  • 5 hours N.Y. Governor Signs Climate Bill
  • 20 hours First limpet mines . . . . now fly a drone at low altitude directly at U.S. Navy ship. Think Iran wanted it taken out ? Maybe ? YES
  • 19 hours Today in Energy
  • 15 hours Which is a better domain name for OAPEC?
  • 3 hours U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
  • 13 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
Alt Text

Iran’s Tactical Move To Skirt Sanctions

Iran is shifting focus from…

Alt Text

Why Is U.S. Demand For Solar Panels Booming?

U.S. solar companies are hoarding…

Cyril Widdershoven

Cyril Widdershoven

Dr. Cyril Widdershoven is a long-time observer of the global energy market. Presently, he holds several advisory positions with international think tanks in the Middle…

More Info

Premium Content

The $32 Trillion Push To Disrupt The Entire Oil Industry

Global oil and gas companies are increasingly facing an uphill battle as global warming policies are taking their toll. Most analysts and market watchers are focusing on peak oil demand scenarios, but the reality could be much darker. International oil companies (IOCs) are likely to face a Black Swan scenario, which could end up being a boon for state-owned oil companies (NOCs).

Increased shareholder activism, combined with global warming policies of institutional investors and NGOs, are pushing IOCs in a corner, constricting financing options for oil companies. 

The first signs of a green revolution in the shareholder-investors universe are there, as investors have forced Dutch oil and gas major Shell to officially change its strategy, investing in more renewable energy and energy storage. The Dutch IOC wasn’t forced by to do so because of mismanagement or a lack of reserves but due to a well-orchestrated investor/stakeholder offensive. Several other peers, such as BP, ENI or Total, are expected to experience comparable situations.

And it has become clear that not only oil and gas giants are being targeted, after one of the world’s largest mining and commodity trading companies, Glencore, decided to put a limit on its thermal coal investment. The group stated that this was done after it was confronted by a largely unknown shareholder network called Climate Action 100+, which claims to be backed by more than 300 investors, managing assets of around $32 trillion. The group was founded a little over a year ago but has already forced oil majors’ boardrooms to take radical decisions.

Related: The Ultimate Tool To Prop Up Oil Prices

The above shows that international hydrocarbon and mining sectors are facing a new obstacle, being confronted by large groups of socially and environmentally engaged shareholders, which are no longer looking at commercial value only. A combination of activist institutional investors, international pension funds and NGOs, is a new force to be dealt with. Stock-exchanged listed companies will need to address the will of their shareholders, especially with regards to climate change policies or decarbonization of the economy. After decades of having focused on creating maximum shareholder returns, things have changed dramatically, but maybe not for the better.

For Climate Action 100+, which includes investors such as Calpers, Allianz SE, and HSBC Global Asset Management, making profitable investments remains a top priority, but they will no longer look accept a passive stance towards climate change. Without complying with the demands of NGOs and socially engaged investors, access to new capital for new oil and gas upstream projects will be reduced. Some even expect that the role of Western IOCs could decline in the next couple of years, due to political shareholder engagement policies. To force IOCs, such as Shell or BP, to comply with policies that would halve their “net carbon footprint” by 2050 could result in a death-wish for these companies in the long-run.

The demise of IOCs, as we know them right now, could come sooner than many may expect. This will, of course, come at a cost for energy-hungry regions or consumers. With a net demand growth for oil and gas in the coming years, the world will need all hands on deck to support upstream investments to bring the hard-needed oil and gas reserves and volumes to the market. With less financing options for IOCs, and also oilfield services, the already existing investment gap in upstream investment worldwide will only grow wider. In contrast to what some media sources are suggesting, oil and gas demand will not diminish, on the contrary, oil and gas prices will rise due to a lack of supply.

That this picture is not a future nightmare scenario but is already the reality, is shown by the fact that a growing amount of smaller oil and gas companies have become insolvent. The latter is partly caused by “global warming constraints” and lower oil prices in general. The first casualties are falling in Europe, mainly the UK, where 16 companies went bankrupt in 2018, in comparison to zero in 2012. British accountancy firm Moore Stephenson stated that lower prices were the main cause. At the same time, increased costs (North Sea decommissioning) and lower oil price expectations are doing the rest. If the international financial markets are going to take over the doomsday scenarios presented by pressure groups and NGOs, independent oil and gas companies are going to be hit extremely hard. No investor is willing to invest in a sector or company that looks to hit rock-bottom in the next decade. Stranded reserves reports, as presented by the Bank of England and others, are not helping at all to change perceptions.

Western consumers and politicians, however, should not already start to cheer a green revolution and the end of the oil era. The future is different and could be even less positive than currently is assessed. Financial pressure on IOCs is opening up a Pandora’s Box. By removing market-oriented oil and gas giants from global markets, the only way to gain access to oil and gas will be the national oil companies (NOCs). Not only are they the real owners of the overwhelming majority of hydrocarbon reserves in the world, but NOCs are also not constrained by shareholder activism or NGO pressure.

The main driver for NOCs is to support the sustainable economic growth of their home country or government. In stark contrast to IOCs, which are fully focused on shareholder value and profits, NOCs have a long-term national approach, in which other factors are playing a role. Saudi Aramco and its peers are not only the sole owner of the reserves but also of most of the value chain. The ongoing downstream focus of NOCs can be seen as a push to gain control of the entire value chain, from exploration to sales. 

This position is still of value to institutional investors and national financial institutions, as the combination of long-term access, ownership and extensive value chain control, is very attractive. The Fitch AA+ rating of Abu Dhabi’s ADNOC shows that NOCs have become very attractive, even more than IOCs at present.

Related: Permian Production To Break 4 Million Bpd In March

Mainstream investors, hedge- and pension funds, are and will be interested in financing NOCs, as long as demand and profits are there. Western consumers and the industry should however also realize that a transformation of power to NOCs will also mean that market fundamentals will change, and possible unexpected hiccups in supply will occur at the will of governments, not due to market fundamentals. NOCs are still controlled and owned by national governments.

Supply risks will increase if IOCs see their influence in the hydrocarbon sector diminish. Destruction of knowledge, technical capabilities and additional financing, could constrain the hard-needed push for new oil and gas production.

(Click to enlarge)

Political and environmental pressure groups should realize that pushing too hard for change could produce a boomerang effect of unwanted-order. To force IOCs to change their investment strategies, and abandon highly profitable upstream projects, while investing in renewables, could be more destabilizing than anticipated. Between 2014 and 2018, upstream oil and gas investments have been hit hard, leaving a $1 trillion investment gap. This development will impact the market within the next 24 months. Lower oil supply will push up prices if demand continues to grow.

By Cyril Widdershoven for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Frank Foley on February 25 2019 said:
    As demand peaks, NOCs will be forced to max out production at any price point in a mad scramble to monetize assets before they're stranded in the ground. 2022 Saudi Aramco won't have the luxury of time to manipulate markets.
  • Jeffrey Pickett on February 25 2019 said:
    Carbon credits for the rich to a worthless bunch of self serving despots aka United Nations. China laughing all the way to the bank. DAVOS flying their jets. Central Bankers(QE) profit/control debtor nations. Obama Nobel Peace Prize for setting the Middle East on fire and flooding Europe with a non assimilating Muslim/Islam population. Al Gore's profiteering the world was supposed to have ended five years ago. Solendra posterchild of leftist lunacy. Reality is the population control plan, lack of water and infrastructure. Universities full of worthless degrees and more debt in the false utopian world aka The Campus and my next book of "ME". Thank goodness I live in Texas. Nuclear Fission, not another battery. Where's Siemens money? Fukushima and Grand Solar Minimum = climate cycles.
  • aldo laghi on February 25 2019 said:
    this prospect might end up inducing the oil majors to fund some climate change fact checks
  • Michael Nelson on February 25 2019 said:
    The West will have a much more difficult time controlling oil price and supply when the NOCs are in control. Expect higher prices as the West tries to go green.
  • John Bohrer on February 25 2019 said:
    If you’re honest about carbon emissions affecting the climate then go after air travel for vacations. Carbon emissions by air travel is enormous, so why are activists not targeting air travel. Something smells fishy.
  • Rudolf Huber on February 26 2019 said:
    There is a silver lining. The more the big companies are forced into this corner, the more good business will remain on the table for smaller companies that are much less prone to this kind of activism. Don't get me wrong, I think this kind of activism is nothing short of terrorism and no company should be subjected to it. But the economy always finds a way to cope and if you drive away the big beasts, the small ones will thrive.
  • bob bobert on February 27 2019 said:
    The push away from oil began a decade ago. It is amazing how inept the oil industry is. Electrification and alternatives are well into their second generation. Peak oil has come and gone. Pull your heads out from under the sand. Wow..
  • Bill Simpson on March 01 2019 said:
    Shut down the delivery of oil products for a few weeks, and see how many people worry about global warming after there is no food on the shelves, and no gasoline in their cars.
    The worlds murderous dictators will love no private company competition for oil, which moves everything.
    Get ready for another financial crisis if oil goes much over $120 a barrel. The next economic downturn will be very dangerous, due to the record level of debt everywhere. People owning low quality debt will lose trillions.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play