• 3 minutes Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 7 minutes Tesla Battery Day (announcements on technology)
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 3 hours The China Daily newspaper just did a flash poll of 1600 Chinese Communist Party members. 98% said Biden won the debate.
  • 1 day Taxes. Personal and Corporate. Trump vs Biden "Blarney" Family. Plans vs Records.
  • 4 hours California’s Electric Vehicle Dream Has A Major Problem: No
  • 8 hours Ilhan Omar connected Ballot Harvester in cash-for-ballots scheme
  • 1 day Kalifornistan, CO2, clueless politicians, climate hustle
  • 6 hours Something wicked this way comes
  • 10 hours What is Best for Germany Now?
  • 1 day Debate Night: Trump needs to be concerned about left leaning Chris Wallace , not Biden
  • 2 days BLM organizer plows her car thru Trump supporters. She was arrested and charged with attempted murder
  • 5 hours If Billionaires like Trump Don't Pay Taxes.
Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing for news outlets such as iNVEZZ and SeeNews. 

More Info

Premium Content

U.S. Brokerage Faces Lawsuit Over Trades At Negative Oil Prices

E*Trade Securities, one of the largest U.S. brokerages, was slapped with a class-action lawsuit on Tuesday for allegedly failing to disclose proper risks to clients that were burnt by the negative WTI Crude oil prices in April, Bloomberg reported, citing the lawsuit filed in California.  

As the WTI Crude futures collapsed into negative territory on April 20, many retail investors lost a lot of money as they were unable to sell the front-month futures contracts they had purchased. Some brokerages limited the ability of their smaller customers to place new trades in the June futures contracts of WTI and Brent Crude, after the May contract of WTI Crude plunged to as low as minus -US$37 a barrel on April 20.  

According to the class-action lawsuit filed with the Northern District Court of California on Tuesday, E*Trade failed to explain to investors that oil prices could go negative and failed to adequately test its trading system to see how it would handle negative prices. E*Trade clients who wanted out of the May WTI Crude contract on the day the prices went negative were unable to do so because the brokerage’s systems failed and locked users out, the lawsuit alleges.

The collapse in WTI Crude futures in April triggered investigations by the SEC and by law firms on behalf of their risk-averse clients. Klayman & Toskes, for example, announced as early as on April 24 that they were undertaking an investigation on behalf of risk-averse investors with Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Merrill Lynch, who had sustained significant losses recently from investment in the turbulent energy sector.

The United States Oil Fund LP (NYSEARCA: USO) - one of the most popular oil-tracking ETFs for retail investors and believed to be one of the reasons for the historic plunge in the May WTI futures – was also hit by a class-action lawsuit in June. Investors in USO filed a class action complaint against the fund for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act between March 19, 2020, and April 28, 2020. The deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action against the fund expired on Tuesday.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News