• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 9 hours PETROLEUM for humanity 
  • 10 hours Why don't the other GOP candidates get mention?
  • 2 hours China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 9 hours Disenfranchised people are angry people - map of global electoral systems
  • 8 hours Brexit agreement
  • 9 hours Bloomberg: shale slowing. Third wave of shale coming.
  • 5 hours Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 1 hour ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 15 hours Spain Is On The Edge...Clashes Between Catalonia And "Madrid"
  • 19 hours Erdogan Holds All The Cards ... 3.6 Million Of Them
  • 17 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
  • 16 hours 5 Tweets That Change The World?
Alt Text

A Draconian Crackdown Looms Over Natural Gas

Natural Gas is coming up…

Alt Text

What’s Really Driving Oil Prices?

With all of the daily…

Alt Text

Tesla's 5 Most Inspiring Inventions

While Elon Musk garners most…

Martin Tillier

Martin Tillier

More Info

Premium Content

Trump’s Trade Wars Could Spark A Massive Drop In Oil

Today, I am breaking with two of my rules in writing these pieces. I generally try to steer clear of politics and to avoid being alarmist or overly sensational. What has forced me to ignore both rules is the announcement on Thursday by Donald Trump that he is going to enact tariffs on steel and aluminum next week. Politicians in general have less influence on economies than they think, but they can cause disruption, and particularly when they make economic decisions for political reasons. That is what this is, and it has the potential to cause a massive selloff of oil and other commodities.

You may feel that this is ultimately good policy and given the circumstance, a strong argument can be made that is true. Here though, the timing of the announcement suggests that it is in response to what looks like increasing chaos in the administration and a Special Counsel’s investigation that seems to be moving inexorably closer to the President himself. In other words, it is a political play, regardless of the potential short-term economic consequences. The actual results of imposing tariffs and sparking retaliation, however, are not the point. What matters, as is so often the case, is perception, and the perception of traders will be that measures such as those proposed could pose a serious threat to global growth and thus cripple demand for oil.

(Click to enlarge)

There has been a lot of focus during oil’s recovery back into the 60s on supply, with the output cuts from the OPEC led group of producers leading to a reduction in the worldwide glut of crude. But, those cuts are only effective if demand continues to grow. Enacting tariffs on steel and aluminum may not seem that big a deal to some, but if history is our guide there is a good chance that it sparks a trade war that has effects way beyond U.S. boundaries. Again, even if that is not the end result here, the fear of it is enough to cause disruption.

The reaction to the announcement so far, both in oil and stocks, has been somewhat muted. Both have dropped over the last two days, but in a relatively orderly fashion. Presumably that is because some people believe that pressure from the President’s economic advisors such as Gary Cohn and fellow Republicans appalled by what they see as policy that is ideologically unsound will force a change of heart. That, however, looks unlikely. Consistency has not exactly been a hallmark of Trump’s political career thus far, but the one area where it has been seen is in protectionism. It was a theme throughout his campaign and has remained one, so hoping for a reversal at this point makes no sense.

Related: Iran Could Lose 500,000 Bpd If Trump Trashes Deal

So, if we have a situation where the President, for reasons of consistency and political expediency, looks set on an action that threatens global economic growth, what should we do about it?

(Click to enlarge)

The obvious thing is to short oil to take advantage of a potential sustained decline. The best way for most people to do that is through a leveraged Bear ETF such as DWT designed to go up as oil goes down and leveraged by a factor of three. Products like this are not perfect, as management fees, the cost of leverage and rollover costs mean that the correlation between the price of the ETF and the price of oil is not perfect. In this case, for example, if oil drops 25% your return would be less than the 75% you might expect.

For a situation like this, though, DWT offer a few advantages. First, it can be bought and sold in a stock margin account. You may have to fill out a form to acknowledge that you are aware of and comfortable with the risk involved, but most people should have ready access to the product. Second, once the position it can be run like a stock position. There is no need to worry about rollovers as there would be with futures, and a simple GTC stop can be used for protection. In this case, with a low in DWT of $10.20, a stop at around $9.80 makes sense initially.

Until yesterday, I had a bullish opinion of oil in the short term, even though I still believed that we would see a drop back later in the year. Trump’s announcement yesterday, however, was a game-changer and I am now positioning for a sharp short-term drop.

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Gary Roy on March 04 2018 said:
    Pretty weak argument for an oil selloff, more of an advertisement for an ETF to short oil. How about US production declines as a result of more expensive steel costs, or a shortage of oilfield steel products that have to be imported.
  • Citizen Oil on March 04 2018 said:
    I think traders are catching on that what Trump says and what he actually does are not related. I don't think the oil market will care too much about this but the stock market will. I'd rather short the Dow than oil . Its a much better bet if you think he'll follow through. Even if he does, the WTO will not allow any of this nonsense to continue for long. Trumps claim of national security interests are nonsensical.
  • citymoments on March 04 2018 said:
    After the second war, in order to help Europe an Japan to recover economically, USA granted huge tax concessions in term of its trading terms with those countries. Today, Japan can sell its cars in USA paying 2% import tax but USA cars makers must pay 25% import tax in Japan if they want to sell its cars in Japan. This is not a trade wars, this is about fair trade among nations. Free trade only works if all nations involved lower their tariff on goods.
  • Bob on March 04 2018 said:
    What would be the cause of the drop in oil? Lower economic activity?
  • LM on March 05 2018 said:
    Not biased.

    My bum. I knew from the first sentence. I am not an alarmist but....! To be followed by a detailed explanation of a short mechanism.

    Classic.
  • greg on March 05 2018 said:
    I would say the opposite is true. Steel tariffs will mean the end of cheap imported steel, driving up costs for those who supply pipelines to American oil and gas producers. Shale production is already being hampered by slow pipeline construction - higher steel prices could prove the tipping point for the heavily-indebted shale industry.
  • Clyde Boyd on March 05 2018 said:
    Your first impression to stay out of politics was correct. Trump is not talking tariffs because of anything to do with the bogus russia witchhunt. He has talked tariffs for 20 years, including the last two years as a candidate. Stick to talking about something you have some level of expertise about.
  • Pankaj Harsora on March 05 2018 said:
    Pres. Trump was not able to change the ACA, so what sort of influence would he have in changing tariffs and trade? ACA was in America for Americans by Americans and still Trump could not change it. Trade is international for Americans, for both Democrats and Republicans and most notably for corporations whose bottom line is profit. Trump is dreaming.
  • paul on March 06 2018 said:
    By applying a tax on imported goods during times of "free trade" negotiations, my reaction is that we are attempting to improve our bargaining position.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play