• 4 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 7 minutes IRAN / USA
  • 11 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 16 minutes Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 7 hours Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
  • 1 hour We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 1 hour Trump capitulated
  • 8 hours Thanks to Trump, the Iranian Mullahs Are Going Bankrupt
  • 14 hours Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 23 mins Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 2 hours US Shale: Technology
  • 2 hours Gravity is a scam!
  • 19 hours Yet another Petroteq debt for equity deal
  • 21 hours Three oil pipeline projects inch toward goal-line for Canada
  • 1 hour Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 2 hours Turkey Muscles-In on Israel-Greece-Cyprus EastMed Gas Pipeline Deal. Erdogan Still Dreaming of Ottoman Empire II.
  • 3 hours What's the Endgame Here?
  • 10 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
Alt Text

What’s Next For Oil? No One Seems To Agree

While many of the headlines…

Alt Text

Two Reasons Why Oil Prices Rose Today

Oil prices were trading slightly…

Alt Text

China Finds Oil In Asia’s Deepest Onshore Well

China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)…

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani is a veteran finance writer, investor, engineer and researcher for Safehaven.com. 

More Info

Premium Content

Three Ways Oil Companies Can Prevent An Investor Exodus

In financial and investment circles, mystery and high stakes frequently go hand in hand. 

For more than a decade, esoteric fracking companies have been hot cakes for investors - particularly private equities - chasing high yields and growth, in large part due to the industry’s huge appetite for capital. 

But lately, the tables have turned. 

Investors are now shying away from energy plays amid growing concerns of dwindling cash flows, credibility and carbon. 

The E&P (Exploration and Production) sector is experiencing a 'crisis of perception' as investors shun it based on perennial underperformance as well as Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) aspects.  

Money continues to flow from the sector to better performing index funds and/or other "greener energy" sectors, as evidenced by shrinking stocks and the sector’s weighting in the S&P 500 dropping from 13% at the height of the shale boom to just 5% currently.

So, how are E&P strategies changing? 

Here are three main ways energy companies are tweaking their ethos.

Strategy #1: Cost Discipline

The growing reluctance to invest in E&P raises major concerns regarding capital availability for the sector. This is especially worrying in light of recent announcements by financial institutions, including banks and pension funds, to limit their allocations to certain or even all fossil fuel investments.

Consequently, energy companies have moved from living on a wing and a prayer, hoping for another oil boom to get them out of the rut to a more proactive philosophy where capital and cost discipline have become the new mantra. Related: The U.S. Aims For Energy Storage Dominance

Debt levels in the energy sector peaked in 2017 but have gradually been coming down. Debt and leverage ratios have steadily improved since then, driven by improved cash flows and increased capital discipline. Many companies turned to debt financing mainly as a stop-gap to keep production flowing in the hope that prices would rebound quickly.

Obviously, this has not happened, with the WSJ reporting that North American energy companies now have $200 billion of debt maturities over the next four years with $40 billion due in 2020.

Source: WSJ

The bad part: It’s unclear how they will repay that mountain of debt, and many might have to stick to the usual playbook of selling shares in the secondary markets. Investors hate share dilution, and this could trigger another wave of selling.

Meanwhile, although organic capex in 2019 increased compared with 2018, it’s still a fraction of the levels recorded in 2013/2014.

Strategy #2: Projects that Deliver Faster

As part of capital and cost discipline, oil and gas companies are rapidly shifting to shorter-cycle projects with faster payback periods. In many cases, they are prioritizing investments with a lower carbon footprint, especially gas.

According to IHS Markit Research, investments in low-carbon sectors by seven leading integrated oil & gas companies have exceeded $8 billion over the past decade.

The strategy seems to be paying off: According to the IEA, energy companies are bringing capacity to the market 20% faster compared to a decade ago. The changing energy system is helping the industry better manage capital at risk.

Source: EIA

Strategy #3: Investing in Renewables

Nowadays, many people dismiss even genuine attempts by the energy sector to adopt the language of climate action and sustainable production as a disgraceful and desperate attempt at greenwash. But truth be told, scores of fossil fuel companies really are at the forefront of the clean energy drive. Related: U.S. Drillers Rush To Hedge Production As Oil Prices Soar

Evolving new technologies, shareholder pressure, and rapidly changing consumer preferences are forcing oil and gas companies to explore new business streams, renewables being chief among them. 

The last four years have seen a surge in renewables investments by oil and gas companies. In the first three quarters of 2019, oil companies closed about 70 deals in various renewable energy sectors including solar, wind and biofuels with Royal Dutch Shell Plc cutting the most valuable deals.

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly, European companies lead their American counterparts by a wide margin, investing 7x as much in the renewable sector last year. 

Seven companies have accounted for about three-quarters of renewable energy deals since 2010, with all but Chevron Corp. and Saudi Arabian Oil Co. being based in Europe.

Source: Bloomberg

The question now is whether oil companies have missed the boat on changing their ethos to combat the crisis of perception among investors.

With $40-billion in debt coming due already this year, our answer to that question may come sooner than we think. The adaptation strategies are working, but they’re going to have to work faster. That’s also what’s likely to make 2020 a year of consolidation more than any other. Those who’ve managed to successfully tweak their ethos can likely scoop up those who haven’t for a nice discount. 

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 10 2020 said:
    The author should have made the title of his article clearer to indicate that he is talking about the US shale oil industry and not the global oil industry.

    It is already too late for the US shale oil industry with $200 bn of debt maturities over the next four years and $40 bn due this year. Investor exodus is gaining momentum.

    The industry is in a terminal state facing oil rig count decline, confirmed production slowdown, declining well productivity and investments, bankruptcies and eventual demise.

    2019 was the year in which the hype around US shale oil production finally burst. And despite the hype by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), US production is over-stated by at least 2 million barrels a day (mbd). This means that US production averaged 10.3 mbd in 2019 and not 12.3 mbd as the EIA claimed and is projected to decline to under 10 mbd in 2020 and will continue declining until its demise in 4-9 years from now.

    As for the global oil industry, it is doing fine and is adapting successfully to climate change and has been accelerating investments in clean energy solutions as part of its adaptation.

    Still, oil and gas will continue to be the core business of the global oil industry well into the foreseeable future or as long as it makes business sense.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Duane McCarrel on January 12 2020 said:
    I see Mr. Salameh is still trying to convince everyone of the demise of the shale business. It must be incredibly frustrating for him to see the economics of middle east projects being ruined by the low price of oil brought on by the American shale industry. One thing you can be assured of, the banks and hedge funds providing external capital to these companies are limiting their exposure by enforcing debt/EBITDAX limits. For the huge majority of companies, these ratios are in balance but Mr. Salameh will still keeps yelling wolf. It was entertaining for a while, but after years of the same, its getting old.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News