• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 7 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 7 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 7 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 7 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Russia And China Continue To Boost Oil Ties

The Russia-China alliance is strengthening…

Alt Text

Oil Quality Issues Could Bankrupt Venezuela

Falling Venezuelan oil quality could…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

‘’The Worst Is Behind Us’’ Schlumberger CEO Sees Reason For Optimism

Schlumberg

All’s not well in oilfield services, but it might start getting a bit better from now on. That’s the essence of a statement made by Schlumberger’s chief executive Paal Kibsgaard on the release of the company’s second-quarter earnings report. The report met with mixed reactions, especially since it also included the announcement of 8,000 more layoffs in the three-month period.

Schlumberger reported a $1.56 loss per share at end-June 2016, down from earnings of $0.40 at the end of the first quarter of the year, and $0.88 at end-June 2015. The dip into the red was caused by charges totaling $1.79 per share. These, the company noted, included impairment charges on assets, expenses related to the layoffs, as well as integration charges linked to the purchase of Cameron International, which was closed in April. Excluding these, the world’s top oilfield service provider would have turned in a profit of $0.23 per share.

Now, if we take the adjusted figure, charges aside, Schlumberger did indeed do better than some analysts expected, more precisely the ones polled by Reuters whose consensus expectation was for EPS of $0.21. Others, however, polled by Bloomberg, expected the company to report a non-adjusted profit of $296.3 million (the total loss was $2.16 billion). In other words, you can’t trust analyst expectations too much, which is hardly any news to anyone.

What’s perhaps more important than the figures is what Schlumberger’s management expects for the future, and that is a gradual improvement. To be fair, neither CEO Kibsgaard, nor President Patrick Schorn have sounded too optimistic when they’ve said that the worst may have come and gone in that second quarter, but even cautious optimism is better than none at all.

“In the second quarter market conditions worsened further in most parts of our global operations, but in spite of the continuing headwinds we now appear to have reached the bottom of the cycle,” said Kibsgaard in his statement on the second-quarter performance of Schlumberger. Schorn was earlier quoted by Bloomberg as saying the second quarter may be “the final approach to a market bottom.”

Oilfield service providers have suffered no less than E&Ps, and in some respects they’ve suffered even more: they were forced to make discounts on their contracts with producers in order to stay in business. Also, of course, they have had to lay off thousands of people. Related: Oil Rally Hopes Crushed As Inventories Hit All-Time High

Schlumberger’s tally so far is around 50,000, including 16,000 laid off in the first half of this year. Layoffs may be a necessary evil, but they drag charges with them and affect bottom lines. At the same time, the second quarter of the year saw Schlumberger cough up $335 million in integration charges after the Cameron deal.

So, the second quarter was a truly hard time for Schlumberger. This, however, may not continue to be so if oil prices strengthen more consistently. The addition of Cameron was a smart move on the part of Schlumberger as it expanded its service portfolio, complementing its current offering without too much overlapping of operations. The cost cuts and layoffs were probably unavoidable, although it may be worth considering how much re-hiring will cost the company once demand for oilfield services picks up—and most observers and analysts seem to agree that it will pick up as output falls and the market rebalances. True, this will take time but it will inevitably take money, too.

All this – the pick-up in demand, the rehiring prospects and the associated spending – are in the future, in the medium-term, at best. Right now, Schlumberger will apparently focus on getting some of those forced discounts on contracts canceled. It’s pretty much business as usual, despite the loss. After all, for Q4 2015, the company posted a loss of $1 billion and cut 10,000 jobs when the crisis was raging at full speed. Then it managed to turn to profit in Q1 2016. It could return into the black again in this quarter. If not, more layoffs will probably be on the way.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News