• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 11 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 6 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 7 hours Waste-to-Energy Chugging Along
  • 27 mins Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 11 mins Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 11 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 11 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 20 hours UK Power and loss of power stations
  • 1 day Zohr Giant Gas Field Increases Production Six-Fold
  • 6 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 14 hours Contradictory: Euro Zone Takes Step To Deeper Integration, Key Issues Unresolved
  • 1 day Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 2 hours Sane Take on the Russia-Ukraine Case
  • 24 hours No, The U.S. Is Not A Net Exporter Of Crude Oil
  • 20 hours EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants
  • 35 mins Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
Alt Text

Libya’s NOC Won’t Pay ‘Ransom’ For Biggest Oil Field

Libya’s National Oil Corporation said…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

The Shale Boom That Will Never Happen

When the National Hydrocarbons Commission of Mexico scheduled its first-ever shale tender for September this year, the July elections were obviously not front and center in the thoughts of its management. Yet now, this tender may be as good as gone after President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said last week,“We will no longer use that method to extract petroleum.”

Obrador was responding to a question about the risks of hydraulic fracturing, the technology that enabled the U.S. shale oil and gas boom and that some believed could be replicated in Mexico, especially for gas production.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimated in 2013 that Mexico has unproved but technically recoverable shale gas resources of 545.2 trillion cubic feet. Most of this, around 343 trillion cubic feet plus about 6.3 billion barrels of oil (half of the total shale oil resource base), is located in the Burgos Basin, which is connected to the Eagle Ford shale play in Texas and covers a much larger area.

While these resources remain largely untapped, Mexico’s natural gas demand is rising, and with it, the country’s dependence on U.S. imports. The Energy Ministry estimated at the beginning of this year that gas demand will average 8.32 billion cubic feet in 2018, compared with 7.99 billion cubic feet in 2017. This will further rise to 9.66 billion cubic feet in 2019. By 2031, gas demand will have risen by 26.8 percent from 2016 levels, the ministry, known as SENER, said at the time. Related: Goldman Sachs Expects “Very, Very Tight” Oil Market

To date, Mexico imports as much as 85 percent of the gas it consumes, the head of the Hydrocarbons Commission, Juan Carlos Zepeda, recently said, adding that this makes increasing natural gas production a higher priority than boosting oil production. Such a heavy reliance on imports, according to Zepeda, carries not just geopolitical risk but also operational risks: a natural disaster could disrupt supply.

And yet imports are rising while domestic production is falling. State-owned Pemex holds the development rights to 90 percent of the country’s gas reserves, yet it cannot develop them without a cash-strong partner.

In this context of heavy dependence on imports and rising demand, shale gas could look like an obvious part of the solution along with conventional gas deposits. However, a ban on fracking might not actually be as significant as it sounds because developing Mexico’s shale gas resources is already a daunting task. There is no well-developed infrastructure in the regions where the shale reserves are located, there is an abundance of gangs there, and perhaps most importantly, water supply is tight, and fracking is a very water-intensive process.

All these factors would be enough to make fracking companies think twice about entering the Burgos Basin in the new post-2014 energy world of low risks and high returns, so in reality, a ban on fracking in Mexico might not make much of a difference for the country’s energy supply developments. After all, the blocks that were supposed to be tendered in September contained total reserves of 54.16 billion barrels of oil equivalent, most of it gas. Of this total, however, just 1.16 billion barrels were shale reserves.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Louis Spring on August 08 2018 said:
    It's bad decisions by Mexican leaders that keep Mexico poor. America has been Frac(k)big since 1949 and given the fact Mexico cannot create jobs and feed its people makes this decision ghastly.
  • Randy Verret on August 08 2018 said:
    Perhaps someone on El Presidente's staff should point out that he might want to do a little research regarding fracing before making such a fateful decision. I believe he has three recent peer reviewed scientific studies on fracing that would be a good start, those being from Penn State, U of Cincinnati & Yale. All three Marcellus/Utica studies have same top line finding: No systematic contamination of groundwater. Same conclusion as US EPA comprehensive study issued in 2016. When you are driven by ideology rather than reason, you might get consequences you don't like. Just a thought...
  • Sam Pyeatte on August 13 2018 said:
    This just shows the stupidity of socialists. They can have riches within their reach, yet be too dumb to exploit them.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News