• 3 minutes Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 6 minutes This Battery Uses Up CO2 to Create Energy
  • 10 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 12 minutes Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 2 mins Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 11 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 18 hours Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 2 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 10 hours Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 29 mins We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 2 hours Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 2 days Wind Turbine Blades Not Recyclable
  • 1 hour China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 18 hours US Shale: Technology
  • 2 days Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 2 days Denmark gets 47% of its electricity from wind in 2019
Ross McCracken

Ross McCracken

Ross is an energy analyst, writer and consultant who was previously the Managing Editor of Platts Energy Economist

More Info

The Real Impact Of Diesel Bans

Gasoline

‘Diesel bans’ should be in force in no less than seven German cities by the first half of next year. They follow measures introduced in Paris and Oslo in 2017, while London will see the introduction of its Ultra-Low Emissions Zone from April 8, 2019, which targets both gasoline and diesel use.

However, despite widespread use in the media, the term ‘ban’ is a misnomer. These regulations do not ban diesel and their impact on oil product demand will be very limited. They are restrictions on the use of older diesel engines, and they often apply to specific routes rather than being city-wide, as in Germany, or come into force only when air pollution breaches set standards, as in Oslo.

They should also not be confused with proposed bans of new sales of internal combustion engines, where the timescale for implementation is much further off. These proposals will depend on alternative modes of road transport being economically viable at that time.

Pincer movement

What is significant is the driving force behind these regulations. It is not climate change but air pollution.

When taken in combination, a clear regulatory pincer movement is developing. At the front end, the immediate policy offensive is driven by urban air pollution as a consequence of ever greater use of internal combustion engines and urbanisation. Further out, the motivator is the potential harmful effects of climate change.

The primary impact will be on the…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News