• 3 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 7 minutes Saudi and UAE pressure to get US support for Oil quotas is reportedly on..
  • 11 minutes China devalues currency to lower prices to address new tariffs. But doesn't help. Here is why. . . .
  • 15 minutes What is your current outlook as a day trader for WTI
  • 2 hours Maybe 8 to 10 "good" years left in oil industry * UAE model for Economic Deversification * Others spent oil billions on funding terrorism, wars, suppressing dissidents * Too late now
  • 19 hours Long Range Attack On Saudi Oil Field Ends War On Yemen
  • 6 hours In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 2 hours Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 5 hours 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 7 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 7 mins With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 5 mins Sad . . . Only thing that moves oil price up is an attack on Tankers or Oil Facilities (Staged or real?)
  • 1 day Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 8 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 11 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 1 day Continental Resource's Hamm wants shale to cut production. . . He can't compete with peers.
  • 2 days NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 1 day US Petroleum Demand Strongest Since 2007
Alt Text

A Limited Risk Play In A Shaken Market

Recession fears tanked stock markets…

Alt Text

The Fastest Growing Energy Producer In The World

Production growth is a key…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Premium Content

The 2020 Elections Could Be A Turning Point For Oil & Gas

Under the next president, U.S. oil and gas companies could lose access to fracking on federal lands.

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has proposed a ban on new drilling on public lands if she becomes president, a stark contrast with the current administration.

Under President Trump, the government has rolled out the red carpet to drillers. In 2018, the U.S. approved almost 40 percent more oil and gas permits on public lands than the year before, according to Reuters. However, much of the increase came as a result of an automated system that was put into place in the waning days of the Obama administration, which cleared a backlog of permits.

But that only further highlights the magnitude of what Senator Warren is proposing. Both Obama and Trump favored more drilling on public lands; Warren wants to put that to an end.

Where Trump differed from Obama has been the systematic gutting of environmental regulations and the push to open up areas for drilling wherever possible. Trump proposed opening up offshore drilling up and down America’s coastline, including the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, and the Eastern Gulf of Mexico that has long been off limits. That plan has run into trouble, both from courts and from politicians in coastal states, including, notably, from Republicans. For instance, Florida’s Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, a Trump ally, just denounced the administration’s plans to open up Florida’s coastline to drilling. Related: ‘High’ Oil Prices Are Already Dampening Demand

Warren wants to go in an entirely different direction. “The Trump administration is busy selling off our public lands to the oil, gas and coal industries for pennies on the dollar?—?expanding fossil fuel extraction that destroys pristine sites across the country while pouring an accelerant on our climate crisis,” Sen. Warren stated. “That’s why on my first day as president, I will sign an executive order that says no more drilling?—?a total moratorium on all new fossil fuel leases, including for drilling offshore and on public lands.”

The “pennies on the dollar” phrase is a reference to the Trump administration’s efforts to lower royalties that oil, gas and coal companies have to pay to exploit public lands. A federal court just rejected the administration’s effort at repealing a policy put in place by Obama’s Interior Department that was designed to close loopholes that had allowed energy companies to avoid making payments. The court ruled that Trump’s repeal was “arbitrary and capricious.”

In contrast, Sen. Warren wants to use public lands for renewable energy, aiming to generate 10 percent of U.S. electricity from clean energy on federal land. She also said that she would reinstate tighter regulations on methane, something that Trump has sought to water down.

America’s public lands belong to all of us. We should start acting like it. That means expanding access, ending fossil fuel extraction, more renewables, and maintaining and improving public lands. Together, we can protect our public lands for generations to come.

It’s still early in the presidential campaign and with nearly two dozen Democratic candidates, it’s not clear that Sen. Warren will emerge at the front of the pack. But she has rolled out a litany of progressive policies that have forced other candidates to take similar stances, and her public lands proposal has laid down a marker that could become something of a baseline in the primary race.

Related: The World’s Most Unorthodox Oil Nation

As a result, the gulf between Trump and his rivals is arguably wider than at any point in the past. There were significant differences between the Obama and Bush administrations, to be sure, but the gap between the parties is growing wider. On the one hand, Trump offers unhindered support for the oil and gas industry. On the other, many – though not all – of the Democratic candidates favor increasing restrictions on drilling. Sen. Warren’s proposal goes the furthest to date – a plan to shut off new drilling on federal lands.

While the oil and gas industry, in many ways, has never had it so good, at least in the United States, the regulatory reprieve under Trump could be just that – an interlude, or a hiatus. The Obama administration implemented significant – though incremental and incomplete – regulations on oil and gas drilling. The next president could take that a step further. Over the long-run, the worsening climate crisis will likely ensure the federal regulatory ratchet moves in a tighter direction.

There are signs that the oil and gas industry already understands this. Remarkably, many of the largest oil companies are coming around in support of tighter limits on methane. Shareholder pressure is also on the rise. Renewable energy and electric vehicles pose a growing threat to oil and gas interests. Even at the IHS CERAWeek Conference in March, many oil executives displayed anxiety about the threat of climate change and renewable energy.

The trend towards clean energy is inevitable and likely unstoppable. But Sen. Warren’s proposal would greatly accelerate that transition. 

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Brian Bresee on April 16 2019 said:
    On so many points, restrictions on drilling in the United States in many cases are foolish. Some how drilling doesn't effect the environment in Saudi Arabia, but is a complete disaster to such in the United States? Some how using the oil drilled for in Russia doesn't affect so called climate change?

    It is drilling in the United States which has given it leverage in both Iran and Venezuela, which otherwise would have sent oil prices to over $150/barrel and destroyed the US economy with its current policy.

    Also the United States runs a massive trade deficit with the world, which is quickly eroding the quality of life for the average worker in the United States as the cost of living far outpaces wages. Drilling in the United States is helping with that trade imbalance, while providing high paying jobs.

    It appears the only Russian collusion occuring is coming from some of these Presidential candidates, and I would expect them to bow to the King of Saudia Arabia as Obama did while President. Both countries along with all of OPEC have trillion dollar reasons to desire a new US President who will restrict drilling.

    In the words of Sara Palin, "Drill baby, drill".
  • Bill Simpson on April 17 2019 said:
    The big New York banks have Trump winning because of the booming economy. Of course, that could change by November, 2020.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play