• 3 minutes Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 7 minutes Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 12 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 hours Oil prices going Up? NO!
  • 1 hour Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 8 hours Renewables to generate 50% of worldwide electricity by 2050 (BNEF report)
  • 43 mins The Tony Seba report
  • 46 mins Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 4 hours Kenya Eyes 200+ Oil Wells
  • 4 hours Are Electric Vehicles Really Better For The Environment?
  • 1 day Oil prices going down
  • 13 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 1 day Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 2 days Oil Buyers Club
  • 2 days Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 1 day China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 2 days Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 1 day Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 4 hours OPEC soap opera daily update
Alt Text

This Russian Oil Major Is Ready To Open The Taps

Russia’s oil giant Lukoil is…

Alt Text

Permian Bottlenecks Begin To Bite

The pipeline bottlenecks in the…

Alt Text

Oil Markets Unmoved By North Korea Summit

Today’s North Korea summit, and…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Paris Talks Fall Short On Climate, But Shift To Clean Energy Is Clear

Paris Talks Fall Short On Climate, But Shift To Clean Energy Is Clear

World leaders have arrived in Paris for the start of the highly-anticipated climate change negotiations. Although most participants, activists, and analysts are more cynical about the process than they were on the eve of the 2009 summit in Copenhagen, expectations and hopes for a deal are still running high.

The reason there is some optimism is the bottom-up approach to the Paris talks. Most of the 200 countries participating have put forward individual carbon reductions goals, with each country laying out specifically how they will contribute. The U.S., for example, has promised to cut emissions by 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. China pledged to reach peak emissions by 2030. Related: This British Bank Is Backing The Bullish Case For Oil

There will also be a few surprise announcements intended to boost momentum for international action. For example, U.S. President Barack Obama along 19 other world leaders announced that they will double the level of R&D investment in clean energy. Half of the $20 billion expected within five years will come from the United States.

At the same time, a group of 28 investors including Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos pledged to pour private money into carrying promising clean tech into commercialization. Gates framed the initiative, dubbed the Breakthrough Energy Coalition, as a complement to the publically-funded R&D announcement put forward by the U.S. government and its partners.

These new initiatives coupled with individual goals are more palatable than the top-down approach of the past, where negotiators tried to come up with a cap on emissions and divide up which country was allowed to pollute, and by how much. While scientifically sound, the approach has thus far been politically impossible. Related: Oil Sands Producers Can Live With Alberta’s New Carbon Taxes

At the same time, the reason the Paris talks may put forward a “successful” agreement is because it lacks ambition. Individual pledges won’t be enforceable in any serious way, the agreement will be voluntary rather than binding, and in any case, some countries are not even putting forward aggressive plans.

More to the point, they will fall far short of what is needed. Much of the world has signed up to a goal of limited average global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, a threshold scientists have argued could still avoid some of the worst effects of climate change. But even if all of the country-specific carbon plans are realized (a questionable proposition), the world will still fall short of the 2-degree target.

Notably absent from the Paris climate talks is any discussion of “unburnable carbon,” the notion that many oil, gas, and coal assets may not be all that valuable at all if their owners are prohibited to produce them by some future policy. Such a discussion inevitably leads to hard caps on emissions and binding agreements to achieve certain outcomes. As mentioned above, the political arena is not prepared to go there. Related: Shell Forced to Scale Back Ambitions

Nevertheless, while international negotiations will inevitably fail to resolve the massive problem of climate change, some semblance of a deal at the very least sets the tone for where we are heading. The fact that most countries are promising to transition towards clean energy and reduce fossil fuel consumption is rather significant, especially if you are a fossil fuel company worried about your long-term business prospects. As Michael Levi of the Council on Foreign Relations notes, the perception of a successful deal is actually one of the more important aspects of it actually being a success. National policies, rather than an international agreement, are what will determine real reductions in emissions, and the perception of success will build political momentum to push forward at the national level.

Already the political environment, both within the United States but also around the world, is starting to make life a little more difficult for oil, gas, and coal companies. Environmental groups are making fossil fuel projects more difficult to pull off (see: Keystone XL, or Arctic drilling). Additionally, the legal troubles for fossil fuel companies, for example, illustrated by the investigation into ExxonMobil, could grow.

Paris will not solve the world’s climate problem. Slashing emissions to levels that scientists say are necessary appear to be increasingly out of reach. However, the world is showing more resolve to transition to clean energy than at any point in the past. While it may be too little to avoid the worst effects of climate change, the Paris talks represent a growing threat to the long-term business prospects for oil and gas companies.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • EdBCN on November 30 2015 said:
    I think folks are too pessimistic about this. The simple truth is that no government is powerful enough to impose the strong de-carbonization that is required to meet the 2 degree goal if the technology isn't there to do it reasonably economically. Folks won't pay a big premium for their electricity or mobility, and industry can't compete if some other country is using much cheaper power sources. So all the promises and commitments are worth nothing without cheap solar, wind, batteries, smart grids, electric cars, etc. But the fact is the technology has arrived. And it shows in the stepped-up efforts that world governments are now willing to commit to this time around. It's doable now, if just barely. And progress is gathering steam at an increasing rate.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News