• 7 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 9 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 11 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 12 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 13 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 14 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 16 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 17 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 19 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 20 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 1 day British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Oil Prices Rise Amid Falling U.S. Rig Count

Oil prices inched higher on…

Alt Text

With A World Awash In Oil, Kazakhstan Faces Fuel Crisis

Kazakhstan is struggling with a…

Alt Text

Kobe Steel Scandal Could Rattle Nuclear Industry

The scandal at Japan’s Kobe…

Offshore’s Next Big Headache: Breakable Bolts

Offshore Oil Rig

The phrase “deepwater well” still makes a lot of people shiver, even six years after the Deepwater Horizon disaster that caused the worst oil-related environmental catastrophe in history. That blowout in the Macondo well in April 2010 resulted in 11 human casualties and almost 5 million barrels of crude being released into the water. One of the reasons for the huge spill was a malfunction in the blowout preventer of the well.

Now it has emerged that faulty bolts in offshore oil well equipment are something of an epidemic, threatening another major disaster.

GE was the first to raise the alarm, baffled that the bolts it uses in the equipment it sells to E&Ps for offshore operations corrode and sometimes snap with no apparent reason, threatening to spill oil. An investigation into the matter was launched back in 2013 by the Department of the Interior, and it soon turned out that the problem is not limited to GE equipment. It’s not new either – evidence of faulty bolts goes back to 2003.

Interior Department officials told The Wall Street Journal that bolts used by GE competitors including Schlumberger and National Oilwell Varco, and like GE’s, produced by subcontractors, are also prone to snapping. The bolts in question are thought to be in an estimated 2,400 platforms just in the Gulf alone.

So far, thankfully, no oil spills have occurred, but the faults have cost the companies operating the faulty equipment some serious cash. Carrying out stack pulls—a process that is necessary to replace many of the bolts—requires shutting down oil wells, sometimes for weeks— is no cheap matter. Related: Has Google Overtaken Tesla In The Self-Driving Car Race?

The problem took a while to surface because, for now, oil well operators are not under any obligation to report faulty equipment unless it leads to a spill. This, however, is about to change very soon.

On 28 July, new safety regulations come into force, prompted by the 2010 disaster. The regulations include stricter design requirements for offshore well equipment as well as more stringent reporting rules. E&Ps will now have to report on bolt failures they discover during regular maintenance sessions.

At the same time, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement is working with drillers, bolt makers and American Petroleum Institute to raise the quality standards of the hardware used in well equipment. Issues addressed include hardness and coating, as well as assembly and installation guidelines.

It’s sheer luck that nothing has happened because of faulty bolts, given that there are 2,400 platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. Nothing, that is, aside from the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe, of course. Now that this greater level of responsibility is being stipulated in official regulations, there’s reason to hope the risk of another huge environmental and economic tragedy will be reduced. Related: Iran Aims To Double Oil Exports, These Are The Hurdles

The industry, including ExxonMobil, has complained about the new regulations, saying they will be very costly and will result in a greater—rather than smaller—risk of new blowouts, “by wresting decision-making from on-site engineers with decades of experience,” Bloomberg reported at the time. BP also argued that some of the rules will increase risk: for instance, the proposal to cement the area around the steel pipe that lines an offshore well could create circumstances conducive to the formation of air pockets that would lead to cracks.

The industry’s criticism could be completely legitimate. On the other hand, it could be an attempt to reverse the changes because they will indeed be costly. Though government estimates put these at $1 billion over ten years, Exxon projected the costs to be $25 billion, and an API-commissioned analysis by Quest Offshore and Blade Energy Partners put the figure even higher, at $31.8 billion.

BP’s credibility has been seriously compromised after 2010, and Exxon’s environmental record is also far from crystal clear. Even so, they may have a solid reason to criticize the new regulations. The government, however, cannot just take these criticisms at face value and drop the changes. If the costs turn out to be impossible to handle by the E&Ps and they are forced to curb drilling, then that would be even better from an environmental perspective – the risks of an oil spill are lower when there are fewer wells.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Colin Macdonald on July 19 2016 said:
    The Macondo disaster had nothing to do with bolt failure and stemmed from the failure of at least 5 barriers of safety. With 2400 platforms in the Gulf and many thousands more the absence of any major offshore accident due to this mechanism is surely more than luck. Probably because no flange has ever failed because of a single bolt shearing.
    The 12 casualties on Macondo were actually fatalities, and this is tragic. There have however been more fatalities in helicopter crashes in the last 20years, they don't receive the appellation "disaster" because more importantly no seabirds died, only poor benighted oil workers. In fact there seems to have been no long environmental impact from Macondo either.
    As Exxon says leave it to the engineers to decide whether something is safe, not the legislature.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News