• 5 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 8 minutes Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 11 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 16 minutes Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 7 hours *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 2 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 12 mins UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 23 hours Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 32 mins Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 1 day Connection Between Climate Rules And German's No-Limit Autobahns? Strange, But It Exists
  • 2 days Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
  • 51 mins How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 2 days Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 23 hours Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 2 days U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Weighs Lifting Tariffs On China
  • 2 days Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
Alt Text

OPEC Cuts Are Already Paying Off

Despite troubling economic data from…

Alt Text

Norway’s Oil Production To Fall To 30-Year Low

Crude oil production in Norway…

Andy Tully

Andy Tully

Andy Tully is a veteran news reporter who is now the news editor for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

OPEC’s Middle Finger To The Oil Markets

OPEC’s decision at its semi-annual meeting in Vienna on Friday not to cut production but to legitimize its overproduction shows that the group is determined at any cost to recover the market share it lost to producers outside the cartel, particularly those drilling for oil in the United States. Which means that the world can probably expect oil prices to remain low for some time.

Traditionally, OPEC members have produced about 40 percent of the world’s crude oil, but 18 months ago prodigious U.S. production began to eat into its market share. It also created an oil glut that caused prices to decline precipitously from a high of more than $110 per barrel beginning in June 2014.

The group had the option of reducing its production ceiling, which had been at 30 million barrels per day for several years, to help stabilize prices. Such a move would have been led by Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s leading producer, which for years had been the “swing” producer, adjusting production up or down to keep prices at levels with which the group was comfortable.

Instead, Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi decided on a strategy to maintain OPEC’s production level, a move that helped accelerate the drop in oil prices, which have now plunged to just over $40 per barrel. There were calls from several members of the group, including Algeria, Ecuador and Venezuela, for OPEC to reduce output, but at Friday’s meeting the cartel agreed to maintain its production ceiling. Related: Eni Could Prove Mexico’s Energy Reform Successful

Al-Naimi said his goal in refusing to cut production was to drive the U.S. drillers out of business. They had been relying increasingly on expensive hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which isn’t profitable unless the average global price of oil is about $60 per barrel. So far that strategy has worked, as rig counts in the United States have fallen substantially.

But al-Naimi’s strategy has also had unwanted side-effects on OPEC members themselves. The Saudi minister evidently believed that oil-producing countries, particularly rich Gulf States, could weather a period of lower revenues while frackers licked their wounds. After all, at the time Saudi Arabia had monetary reserves of about three-quarters of a trillion dollars.

But less affluent OPEC countries such as Venezuela were hit with serious losses. And eventually even Saudi Arabia began to feel financial pressure and was forced to revise the projected budget revenues. Even the stock markets of Gulf States were affected: On Oct. 30, the U.S. financial services company Standard & Poors cut its rating of the Saudi sovereign debt. Related: Oil Price Rebound Might Come Too Late For These Bakken Producers

There had been some hope that Friday's OPEC meeting would have a different outcome. Saudi Arabia had proposed that the group reduce output if other producers, OPEC members and non-members alike, agreed to do the same. “We cannot cut alone,” one official from the region said Wednesday. “Everyone has to contribute to that – Iran, Iraq, and the rest outside OPEC.”

Two oil producers, however, Iran and Russia, rejected the plan Thursday. Iran’s oil minister, Bijan Namdar Zanganeh, said in Vienna that setting production levels “is our right and anyone cannot limit us. … [W]e do not expect our colleagues in OPEC to put pressure on us. … It is not acceptable, it’s not fair.” Iran expects to resume robust oil production next year, once U.S. and European Union sanctions on its oil and financial industries are lifted as a result of a deal for Tehran to limit its nuclear program. Related: Is The Oil And Gas Fire Sale About To Start?

And in Moscow, Russian Oil Minister Alexander Novak said he didn’t see any reason for his country to reduce production because he didn’t expect OPEC itself to mean what it said about cutting output. Russia's own output in November, for example, was nearly at a post-Soviet record, with output of crude oil and gas condensate averaging 10.779 million barrels a day, according to Energy Ministry figures.

Assuming that the Saudi proposal on cutting production was sincere, the rejections by Iran and Russia were a deal-killer. But then few people believed a production cut was likely regardless of the Saudi proposal.

Whatever anyone expected before the meeting, the only thing anyone can expect now is that the price of oil will remain low for the foreseeable future, as will the various degrees of pain it causes in oil-producing countries and among investors.

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Seth on December 07 2015 said:
    "Al-Naimi said his goal in refusing to cut production was to drive the U.S. drillers out of business. They had been relying increasingly on expensive hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which isn’t profitable unless the average global price of oil is about $60 per barrel. So far that strategy has worked, as rig counts in the United States have fallen substantially."

    I certainly hope investors aren't taking this article too seriously, and I'm amazed anyone is still talking about "rig counts" as a relevant metric. U.S. oil production is down a whopping 1% trailing 12 months and this is after a big drop in price. The real story is about the resilience of shale producers as shale extraction costs continue to drop.

    The losers in this story are the Saudis, Venezuelans, Russians and other petro-states, and the winners include U.S. shale producers who have a foot on the backs of the Saudis and other losers who are eviscerating their own economies.
  • Why on December 09 2015 said:
    And consumer give middle finger to OPEC
  • Philip D Evans on December 10 2015 said:
    It seems that no oil producer can risk cutting production in case nobody else does . Those that attend OPEC are there for what they can glean from others rather than bringing anything to the table themselves . This is free-market economics or every man for himself . The oil ministers have their own governments and population to answer to . If they cut production and nobody else does they will be castigated or worse . Oil will be produced and sold at maximum capacity by all producers as long as they can make it pay . From where I am sitting the price of oil is not low at all and has much further down to go . It was being held artificially high by the very noble but ultimately futile idea of international agreement and global control

    I would tip Crude Oil as a definite SELL for the time being until one or two major producers stop pumping the stuff . I wont be buying until it is as low as $25 a barrel possibly lower .. Don't try this at home folks!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News