• 4 minutes End of Sanction Waivers
  • 8 minutes California Politicians Hiked Gas Tax, Now Demand Investigation Into State's $4 Per Gallon Gas Prices
  • 11 minutes What Would Happen If the World Ran Out of Crude Oil?
  • 15 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 3 hours Permafrost Melting Will Cost Us $70 Trillion
  • 20 mins California is the second biggest consumer of oil in the U.S. after Texas.
  • 4 hours Let's just get rid of the Jones Act once and for all
  • 37 mins Balancing Act---Sanctions, Venezuela, Trade War and Demand
  • 3 hours Saudi, UAE Overstate Their Oil Capacities?
  • 23 hours At Kim-Putin Summit: Theater For Two
  • 3 hours Robots And Emotions: Simulated Love Is Never Love
  • 23 hours NAFTA, a view from Mexico: 'Don't Shoot Yourself In The Foot'
  • 20 hours "Undeniable" Shale Slowdown?
  • 1 day UNCONFIRMED : US airstrikes target 32 oil tankers near Syria’s Deir al-Zor
  • 1 day Nothing Better than Li-Ion on the Horizon
  • 1 day New German Study Shocks Electric Cars: “Considerably” Worse For Climate Than Diesel Cars, Up To 25% More CO2
  • 1 day Russia To Start Deliveries Of S-400 To Turkey In July
Alt Text

Oil Climbs Higher As U.S. Looks To End Iran Sanction Waivers

The U.S. administration is preparing…

Alt Text

Trump’s Offshore Drilling Boom May Not Happen Before 2020

President Donald Trump is considering…

Alt Text

Are China’s Crude Reserves Quietly Dwindling?

While China’s strategic petroleum reserves…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

OPEC’s Impossible Task

OPEC is on the verge of extending its production cuts for an additional nine months, pushing the deal through the end of 2018. But the determination to keep the cuts in place comes at the same time that U.S. shale seems to be accelerating in response to higher oil prices.

It’s an impossible tension that OPEC has to deal with. Hesitate on cuts and risk another slide in oil prices, or keep the cuts in place and offer more room to U.S. shale?

OPEC has tried to send a signal to the oil market that the group is operating with a consensus, and it telegraphed its intentions ahead of time to inspire confidence in the group’s cohesion. By demonstrating such resolve, the logic seems to be, the oil market would continue to tighten and prices would remain stable.

But the downside of such a strategy is that it isn’t just oil traders who are confident in a more balanced oil market – U.S. shale has kicked drilling into a higher gear recently, and appears poised to continue to ratchet up production. The rig count has climbed for several consecutive weeks, and U.S. oil production is on the brink of hitting an all-time record high.

The difficulty for OPEC, as Bloomberg Gadfly notes, is that the estimates for how much supply the U.S. will add next year differ by a wide margin. The IEA predicts non-OPEC supply growth by about 1.4 million barrels per day (mb/d) in 2018, a massive sum that would overwhelm demand. In this view, the OPEC cuts are badly needed to avoid another price collapse. OPEC is more hopeful that the shale industry will struggle; the cartel only predicts non-OPEC supply growth of less than 900,000 bpd next year. Related: The Petrodollar’s Biggest Challengers

There are plenty of signs to suggest that the shale industry is indeed facing unexpected troubles. But the problem for OPEC is that it simply can’t forecast with any accuracy what to expect from shale drillers over the next year.

Nevertheless, the objective of the OPEC production limits is to drain global crude inventories back down to average levels, a goal that will take more time to reach. With that in mind, it would make sense that the group locks in an extension of the agreement in a few days’ time.

But while there are some warning OPEC about a shale comeback, there are also voices that are warning OPEC that it could be doing too much. Brent is already safely in $60-per-barrel territory, and extending the cuts through next year could push prices up even more. “I’m used to OPEC not doing enough,” Rainer Seele, CEO of OMV AG, said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. “Now they are over-delivering.”

Higher prices might be the result. “There’s actually a chance the market will over-tighten and prices go close to $70 soon,” Doug King, chief investment officer of the Merchant Commodity hedge fund, told the WSJ. At those prices, analysts worry about demand destruction. Related: How Many Barrels Of Oil Are Needed To Mine One Bitcoin?

The tricky thing for OPEC is that there isn’t much of a middle ground. OPEC is “also vulnerable if they don’t extend, that will spook the market,” Doug King said to the WSJ. There are risks for both keeping the cuts in place and letting them expire.

But because of the threat of an immediate price collapse, it is difficult to see how OPEC exits from its production limits. “Now that they’re in it, I don’t see how they get out of it,” Mike Wittner, head of oil market research at Societe Generale, told Bloomberg. “They need to continue supply management for the foreseeable future.”

An exit from the production limits will probably only become palatable when the oil market is much tighter – inventories at average levels, either a supply/demand balance or a slight deficit, and higher prices. In that context, especially with Saudi Arabia queuing up an IPO of Saudi Aramco, OPEC will likely err on the side of overtightening and allowing U.S. shale to come back more forcefully. The only question, at this point, is if Russia is on board.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Dan White on November 27 2017 said:
    You have to have big co-hones to bet against OPEC.


    Shale is a big lie, it is a media weapon to combat high oil prices. Look at the SPR, it keeps shrinking and shrinking. Remember when Trump took office he said he wanted to sell half the SPR, that is because it is probably already gone just not yet fully reported.
  • Kr55 on November 27 2017 said:
    Their first step would be to ignore the IEA because the IEA's numbers for supply and demand have proven to be garbage for many consecutive years. Then, do their own analysis as they collectively know more about the industry than anyone, and even more about shale than most shale players as they have been buying up technology at bargain basement prices during the crash. Then, decide what is best.
  • Nuggy on November 27 2017 said:
    I think they will take the shale bluff all the way. I doubt they will continue to give it away for next to nothing.

    Right now you got the Venezuela slow down and the Canadian pipeline break down. I think the EIA will inflate shale numbers again this week to keep the price from going into the $100 bbls range.
  • TM on November 28 2017 said:
    All the comments criticizing this article show a desperate need for higher oil prices. In my opinion, all these guys have bet on higher oil prices and thereby anything that goes their permanent wishful thinking "must" be wrong (because they say so and otherwise they will lose money). The truth is OPEC is in a desperate situation and it's only chance to keep influencing oil prices is to keep alive the agreements with non-OPEC relevant producers like Russia. But that can't last forever.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News