• 5 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 8 minutes Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 11 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 16 minutes Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 46 mins *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 8 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 5 hours Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 6 hours UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 1 day Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 2 days Connection Between Climate Rules And German's No-Limit Autobahns? Strange, But It Exists
  • 2 days Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
  • 7 hours How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 2 days Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 1 day Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 2 days U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Weighs Lifting Tariffs On China
  • 2 days Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
Alt Text

The Oil Bull Market Is Back

Oil entered a bull market…

Alt Text

Something Extraordinary Is Happening In Jet Fuel Markets

A confusing divergence is occurring…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Methane Emissions From Oil And Gas Could Be Higher Than EPA Says

A series of new studies find that methane emissions from oil and gas operations in the Barnett Shale are actually 50 percent higher than what the EPA has estimated.

The studies, published in Environmental Science & Technology, paint a varied picture, however. The source of methane emissions come from an array of sites, and could be a larger problem than many thought. However, plugging the leaks is largely possible with available technology and monitoring.

Oil and gas drilling have come under increased scrutiny for their “fugitive methane” emissions in recent years – essentially natural gas that has escaped into the atmosphere either during the drilling process or along the supply chain. The problem with methane is that it is a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change, and is somewhere on the order of 25 times as potent in terms of its warming potential when compared to carbon dioxide. That has the federal government looking to tighten the regulatory screws on leaking methane.

But finding and assessing the rate at which methane is escaping into the atmosphere is difficult, and studies measuring the true extent of the leakage rate run the gamut. Related: EIA Data Still Diverging From Reality

The 11 studies just published find that methane emissions could be 50 percent higher than what the EPA has found. The studies were coordinated by the Environmental Defense Fund, an environmental group that seeks to reduce fugitive methane emissions. Steven Hamburg, chief scientist with EDF, wrote on July 7 that the studies prove that the “industry has a significant methane pollution problem driven by widespread, often unpredictable emission sources.”

At the same time, Hamburg says that getting a handle on the emissions is entirely feasible. A 2014 study from ICF finds that the industry could slash methane emissions by 40 percent over five years by using technology that is already available. Better yet, it would only cost one cent per thousand cubic feet of natural gas. Related: Is Russia Ready To Make A Comeback?

However, the latest studies, which focused on the Barnett Shale, show that companies are choosing not to plug their leaks since they are not required to. But that could change. The federal government released a proposal earlier this year that calls for a 40 to 45 percent reduction in methane emissions between 2012 and 2025. The particulars have not yet been finalized, but the EPA and the Bureau of Land Management will soon release proposed regulations.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News