• 4 minutes "Natural Gas Trading Picks Up Considerably Amid High Volatility" by Charles Kennedy - ...And is U.S. NatGas Futures dramatically overbought at the $6.35 range?
  • 8 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 12 minutes  What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
  • 2 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 6 hours Natural Gas is the Cleanest and most Likely Source of Energy to Fuel the World.
  • 1 day "Russia will stop 'in a moment' if Ukraine meets terms - Kremlin" by Reuters via Yahoo News...but Reuters suddenly cut out the balanced part of the story.
  • 3 days What China is Learning from Russia's War in Ukraine and its Consequences
  • 20 hours Advancing Fundamental Drilling Science - Geothermal drilling successes offer potential gain for petroleum industry
  • 2 hours The World Economic Forum (WEF) - Davos 2022 Conference held this last week of May
European Drivers Face Further Gasoline Squeeze

European Drivers Face Further Gasoline Squeeze

European drivers who are already…

Oil Prices Move Higher On Bullish EIA Inventory Data

Oil Prices Move Higher On Bullish EIA Inventory Data

Crude oil prices moved higher…

OPEC Cuts Global Oil Demand Growth Forecast, Again

OPEC Cuts Global Oil Demand Growth Forecast, Again

Slower global economic growth, China’s…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Why The Bears Completely Missed The Mark On Oil Demand

  • Covid era peak oil demand predictions didn’t age well as oil demand is still going strong despite the fresh scare of the Omicron variant
  • IEA Chief Birol: Demand dynamics are stronger than many of the market observers had thought
  • The oil demand outlook appears to be so bullish that even U.S. shale drillers have begun boosting their production

In 2020, as the coronavirus locked down country after country, many energy industry observers and even participants floated the argument that this was the end of the oil era. Demand, these commentators said, had peaked. From now on, it will be a downward spiral for it, they said. These predictions did not age well.

Just a year into the pandemic, economies were reopening, growing, and unsurprisingly for many, consuming more crude oil. Last September, Bloomberg reported that some of the world's biggest economies had seen a rebound in oil demand to pre-pandemic levels and even further growth on top of these levels.

Now, two years into the pandemic and with hopes it could be the last one for infection waves, oil demand is still going strong despite the fresh scare of the Omicron variant. Analysts are predicting higher oil prices still, citing limited capacity, insufficient investment in new production, and the strength of demand.

The International Energy Agency this week expressed its surprise with this demand strength. The IEA, it seems, had assumed that for some reason or another, oil demand growth would slow down. Perhaps the assumption had something to do with the agency's own energy forecasts that see massive growth in wind and solar power generation capacity and a strong increase in EV adoption, with the latter directly affecting oil demand. Yet its assumption proved to be quite wrong.

"Demand dynamics are stronger than many of the market observers had thought, mainly due to the milder Omicron expectations," the IEA's chief, Fatih Birol, said this week. Translated, this statement means that the IEA expected more national lockdowns to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus variant. Yet more severe lockdowns were quite unlikely this time around—even the wealthiest economies would find it hard to cope with another shutdown of their economies, so they are approaching this Omicron wave more carefully than previous ones.

"We see some of the key producers including Nigeria, Libya and also Ecuador that have serious supply disruptions," Birol also said, echoing concern by analysts that the supply side of the global oil equation is as problematic as the demand side. Ecuador is already restoring production after it repaired two important pipelines. Libya continues to be a wild card, and Nigeria is struggling but determined to boost its oil production.

This is the present state of oil fundamentals. The future may look different. For one thing, the underinvestment problem is becoming increasingly grave. Both OPEC and the IEA—the latter which has rebranded itself as a champion of the energy transition—have warned that the world needs more new oil discoveries.

The only reason for this could be that demand is not dying as fast as hoped by all the champions of the energy transition. Yet Big Oil is curbing its oil output because of transition pressure, and this would mean not just fewer new discoveries because of lower investment in exploration but also lower output from some of the biggest producers out there. This would swing the burden of supply more to OPEC+ whose spare capacity is shrinking, just like European Big Oil's output.

The oil demand outlook appears to be so bullish that even U.S. shale drillers have begun boosting their production despite a pandemic-induced rearrangement of priorities that saw them focus on returning cash to shareholders and forego production growth. With oil exports last year hitting record highs, failing to take advantage of the opportunity to supply a higher portion of the oil an energy-hungry world needs would have been a little odd.

"The consumption of oil and gas has to diminish, demand has to decline," the IEA's Birol said earlier this month in comments on a Canada-focused report. "There is no way out. But I wanted to make clear that a declining demand doesn't mean tomorrow they will be zero."

The statement echoes one made by President Biden when he was criticized for asking OPEC to pump more oil while at the same time pushing a green transition-heavy agenda at home. Biden argued the two were not mutually exclusive because the transition took time.

"On the surface, it seems like an irony," Biden said earlier this month, referring to his call on OPEC+ to add more oil production while heading for COP26 to discuss the reduction of global emissions. "But the truth of the matter is ... everyone knows that idea that we're going to be able to move to renewable energy overnight ... it's just not rational."

Indeed, despite calls from some more radical environmentalist groups to do exactly that, oil and gas production cannot be stopped overnight to ensure a clear path towards the 2050 net-zero goals. But even the decline that the IEA's Birol correctly sees as essential for the achievement of the Paris Agreement goals might prove a tough nut to crack. Unless, of course, governments resort to a series of bans and mandates to point their citizens in the right direction. Come to think of it, some are already doing just that.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 17 2022 said:
    At the height of the pandemic in 2020 with global lockdown curtailing most economic, travel and aviation activities and global oil demand and prices in free fall, environmental activists, divestment campaigners and the hapless International Energy Agency (IEA) began fooling themselves and also trying to fool others that the pandemic will bring forward peak oil demand and accelerate energy transition and a reduction in zero emissions. They didn’t realize that global bent-up oil demand fired up by China’s rebound will more than compensate for the pandemic. That is why the bears completely missed the mark on oil demand.

    Moreover, the notion of peak oil demand is an illusion. Global oil demand is projected to keep growing (albeit at a decelerating rate in the future) because of rising global populations and growing global economy.

    In the next five years (2022-2027) crude oil prices are projected to be on an upward trajectory which could take Brent crude price to $110-$120 a barrel in what could be seen as real signs of a supercycle. Meanwhile, we may see $100 oil by the fourth quarter of 2022 or the first quarter of 2023 because of widening supply deficit resulting from underinvestment during the last two years in oil and gas.

    Big Oil particularly international oil companies (IOCs) won’t have much say in the future about global oil demand and prices because of their declining reserves as a result of growing resource nationalism. The overwhelming oil supplies will be provided by the national oil companies (NOCs) from three regions of the world, namely the Arab Gulf region, Venezuela’s Orinoco Belt and Russia’s Arctic.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News