• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 1 hour Bloomberg: shale slowing. Third wave of shale coming.
  • 3 hours ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 3 hours Boring! See Ya Clowns, And Have Fun In Germany
  • 3 hours Crazy Stories From Round The World
  • 5 hours USA Carried Out Secret Cyber Strike On Iran In Wake Of Saudi Oil Attack
  • 6 hours Shale Magic: SABIC, ExxonMobil break ground on US Gulf Coast petrochemical project
  • 6 hours Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 4 hours 5 Tweets That Change The World?
  • 1 hour the future
  • 31 mins China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 7 hours PETROLEUM for humanity 
  • 3 hours Climate Protesters Blocking Roads etc...
  • 8 hours How The US Quietly Lost The 1st Amendment
Alt Text

Oil Discoveries Hit 70-Year Low

The last three years has…

Alt Text

Big Oil Tries To Buy Back Investors

Despite the turbulence in oil…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Why Oil Is Still Underpriced

Oil prices seesawed over the past week, jerked higher by tension in the Middle East but dragged down by fears of the fallout from the U.S.-China trade war. In fact, crude is trapped between those two forces, and will likely bounce around in the near future based on which factor appears to exert more influence on the market.

Oil saw upward pressure in recent days as the U.S. government seems in danger of rushing into yet another war in the Middle East. National Security Adviser John Bolton appears dead set on trying to escalate conflict with Iran – even as tensions ratcheted up quickly over the past two weeks, officials on Bolton’s National Security Council “were initially dismissive of the need to draw up de-escalation options,” CNN reported, a clear sign of Bolton’s intentions.

However, President Trump appears to be trying to tap the brakes even as he largely agrees with the “maximum pressure” campaign on Iran. He reportedly told the Pentagon that he does not want a war. After all, he campaigned removing the U.S. from endless wars in the Middle East. Nevertheless, having pushed the U.S. to the brink of conflict, dialing down tensions may not be so simple, especially with Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo still running the show.

Trump’s decision to withdraw from the nuclear deal last year, followed by sanctions on Iranian oil, sanctions on Iranian metals exports, and more recently, sending naval ships to the Persian Gulf – all of the moves are calculated to ratchet up the pressure and arguably to provoke Iran into reacting. The danger is that either side miscalculates.

In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported on May 16: “Intelligence collected by the U.S. government shows Iran’s leaders believe the U.S. planned to attack them, prompting preparation by Tehran for possible counterstrikes.” Those moves by Iran have then been cited by U.S. officials as evidence of an imminent threat from Iran. In short, the Trump administration is playing a dangerous game. Any misstep or misinterpreted maneuver could theoretically lead to the breakout of war.   Related: A Value Play Too Good To Ignore

The good news is that Trump seems to want to de-escalate. Trump met with Swiss president on Thursday, which many view as an attempt to jumpstart negotiations with Iran. The Swiss have acted as an intermediary between the two sides in the past. Trump also said on twitter on May 15, “I’m sure that Iran will want to talk soon.”

Against this alarming backdrop, oil prices shrugged off serious concerns about the global economy, with Brent rising back to $72 per barrel over the past week. Even still, the market is “underpricing Iran risks,” according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Meanwhile, the Brent futures curve is in a rather steep backwardation – in which front-month contracts trade at a premium to longer-dated futures. This suggests that the market is tight, at least for now.

At the same time, oil faces enormous downside risks from the U.S.-China trade war. In fact, demand was already slowing before the latest round of tariffs. “[G]lobal oil demand growth has decelerated sharply in recent months, averaging just 680k b/d in the past two quarters compared to trend demand growth of 1.46mn b/d in the past 5 years,” Bank of America Merrill Lynch wrote in a note to clients. Weaker manufacturing activity in the U.S., China and Germany have translated into weak distillate demand, the bank noted.

The trade war could make things worse. Tariffs have impacted “some pockets of the global economy,” Bank of America said, but the recent increase could begin to trickle down to more and more consumers. As the bank notes, models based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve suggest there is a one in two chance of a U.S. recession over the next 12 months, although there is disagreement over how important this metric is. Related:No, The Oil Glut Hasn’t Disappeared

The downside risk to crude oil is magnified by the fact that speculators have bought up a huge volume of positions in oil, which could exert influence over prices in the short run. “[T]here is a risk that a large portion of the speculative community will nervously rush out of their positions if chances of a US recession increase again,” Bank of America warned.

The trajectory for crude oil prices hinges very much on what happens next with the U.S.-China trade war. “In our view, the global business cycle is at a key junction. Weakness in manufacturing may drag down services if trade wars eventually hurt consumer sentiment. In a global downturn, Brent could slip to $50/bbl,” Bank of America analysts wrote. “On the other hand, under a US-China deal scenario, business confidence may return with a vengeance, resulting in a weaker USD and stronger global growth. If a cyclical global demand upturn coincides with an IMO2020 boost, Brent crude oil prices could spike to $90/bbl.”

In short, the oil market is “underpricing the upcoming tail risks,” Bank of America said.

Bob McNally, president of the Rapidan Energy Group put it more bluntly in a statement to Axios. “The oil market has rarely seen so much two-way risk. China, trade and macroeconomic weakness could send crude prices at least $15 lower and intensifying geopolitical disruption risks in the Middle East and Venezuela could propel them higher by a similar amount,” he said.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Michael W on May 19 2019 said:
    I'm not underestimating the seriousness of the situation. The entire world is captive by Trump's Twitting. He has stated that if Iran or one of its Satellite States attack the US or its Allies, the US will retaliate. If you have noticed that once he made that statement the attacks stopped and both Iran and US officials have stated that they do not want to escalate the violence. If this is true its a stalemate. So, the ball is now in Iran's court. There is one interesting note, recently, China took delivery of oil from Iran. China could through a wrinkle into Trump's plan by continuing to take delivery of oil from Iran.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on May 20 2019 said:
    Oil is indeed underpriced because the global oil market hasn’t irrevocably re-balanced. There is still a small glut in the market that exerts a downward pressure on oil prices.

    Another major factor is that both the United States and Iran are starting to realize that a war between them is not an option. Such a war would engulf the whole Gulf region and also Israel causing huge damage to their economies and also to US national interests in the Middle East and a disruption of oil supplies pushing the oil price to $130 a barrel or even higher. That would exacerbate US budget deficit and add significantly to the $22 trillion of US outstanding debts. Moreover, it could cost President Trump his second term at the White House.

    And while the trade war between the US and China continues to create uncertainty in the global oil market and act as a bearish influence on oil prices, the trade war is neither about oil prices nor about trade surplus and so-called malpractices by China. It is about the petro-yuan undermining the supremacy of the petrodollar and by extension the US financial system, Taiwan, refusal by China to comply with US sanctions against Iran, the new order in the 21st century, China’s overwhelming dominance in the Asia-Pacific region and its claiming of sovereignty over 90% of the South China Sea and above all the fear of the US losing its unipolar status.

    I am convinced that the robust fundamentals in the global oil market will eventually push prices this year to $80 a barrel if not even higher provided Saudi Arabia doesn’t succumb again to pressure by President Trump and raise its oil production as it did in June last year leading to a collapse in oil prices.

    Moreover, it is my carefully considered view that a fair oil price ranges from $100-$130 a barrel. Such a price range is good for the global economy in that it invigorates the three biggest chunks of the global economy, namely global oil investments, the global oil industry and the economies of the oil-producing nations of the world.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play