• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 21 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 7 days Natron Energy Achieves First-Ever Commercial-Scale Production of Sodium-Ion Batteries in the U.S.
  • 8 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 7 hours By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 6 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 9 days RUSSIA - Turkey & India Stop Buying Russian Oil as USA Increases Crackdown on Sanctions
Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

U.S. Oil Companies Look To Skirt Biofuel Quotas

Crude oil pipeline

Continuing a national trend, the United States’ second-largest oil refining company has recently requested a biofuel hardship waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The waiver, if granted, would allow refining giant Marathon Petroleum Corp. to exempt one of its facilities from Obama-era federal biofuel quotas.

This move coincides with a recent campaign by the EPA to expand biofuel waivers, to the delight of the oil industry and the equally strong dismay of the corn lobby, who depend on the biofuel standard for sales of alternative corn-based fuels like ethanol. The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) has been a huge boon to farmers, creating a 15 billion gallon a year market for corn-based ethanol. On the other hand, over the past few months the EPA has saved the oil industry hundreds of millions of dollars in regulatory costs by way of similar biofuel hardship waivers.

These waivers are given to small refineries who are able to prove that complying with the RFS, which obligates them to mix biofuels (like ethanol) into their fuel, would result in “disproportionate economic hardship.” While the EPA has always had this authority, they have recently been ramping up their grants of these waivers under new administration and Scott Pruitt’s direction.

Now Ohio-based Marathon is pushing the limits of the waiver requisites by making a waiver request for one of their plants, since it certainly is not a “small” refinery by any stretch of the imagination. In fact, Marathon’s smallest refinery, based in Canton, Ohio, has an output of 93,000 barrels per day, well above the cap that the EPA has defined for “small refineries” at 75,000 barrels per day. While Marathon may be able to find a loophole by running the plant under capacity, or perhaps apply for just a portion of one of its larger facilities, the EPA has not publicly made any decision as to whether the request will be granted. Related: Court: Petrobras Strike Is Illegal

Marathon’s biofuel waiver request is not the first by a major oil industry player claiming hardship. U.S. supermajors ExxonMobil and Chevron, among the most profitable companies in the world, have also petitioned the EPA for hardship waivers. If granted, these requests by Marathon, ExxonMobil, and Chevron also won’t be the first waivers the EPA has approved for a refinery owned by decidedly not small company. Just a few months ago billionaire Carl Icahn was granted a hardship waiver for his 74,500-bpd Wynnewood, Oklahoma, refinery. The plant is owned by Icahn’s CVR Energy. Though he stepped down in August, Icahn was notably a special advisor to President Trump regulatory reform and other related issues.

Reuters has reported that the EPA has granted dozens of small refinery waivers for 2017 in the past months, according to a source from within the agency. This would mean that the rate at which the EPA is granting waivers under President Donald Trump has tripled as compared to past administrations. This has created a major point of contention between the powerful oil and corn lobbies.

The biofuel industry was already struggling before the recent waiver wave, but they were already pointing to the new administration as the culprit for strikingly low ethanol demand based on previous projections. As a result, many refiners have been shuttering or selling off their biofuel facilities. Related: U.S. Oil Exports Eat Into OPEC Market Share In Asia

In the midst of these industry contentions, there has also been a lot of political pressure on the current administration to slow its approval of biofuel waivers and to stop doting on the oil industry. Most notably, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, one of the nation’s biggest corn producers, has been extremely vocal in his condemnation of the direction the EPA has taken under Pruitt, going so far as to call for his resignation in the flood of biofuel wavers doesn’t stop.

Now, however, the Trump administration seems to be changing its tune in order to appease Big Corn, claiming that in an upcoming biofuels policy overhaul the EPA will be significantly scaling back its hardship waiver grants. After hosting a series of meetings between representatives for the corn and oil refining industries, the White House has said that they are in the final stages of creating new biofuel policies and have indicated that an announcement is impending.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Tom on May 30 2018 said:
    The recent spat of EPA Refinery Waivers, for Refiners to not participate in the Renewable Fuels Program, just proves the point of why the Renewable Fuels Program was mandated in the first place. Refiners who control the fuel market, will not willingly participate in the Renewable Fuels Program unless forced to do so. Ethanol is a very high octane blending component, that reduces hazardous air emissions, reduces exposure to carcinogenic Benzene compounds and currently cost less than gasoline, even on an energy equivalent basis. So why not use ethanol for octane? Big Oil would rather make money with polluting, carcinogenic fuels that they produce, then clean up American Gasoline. In my opinion this is why we need Tesla and the other electric car companies. For the last 13 years or more, the oil industry and the API have shown they have no interest in cleaner fuels, or a cleaner environment. Now we seem to see that the EPA doesn't have any interest in these things either. Part of the Clean Air Act Law Requires that Harmful Aromatic Hydrocarbons in gasoline be minimized to the Greatest Extent Possible. EPA is supposed to be doing this, yet last year the ethanol industry exported 1.4 Billion Gallons of Ethanol that could have been used to "Minimize the harmful Aromatic Hydrocarbons in our fuel to the Greatest Extent Possible." Evidently Refinery Profits are more important to Scott Pruitt at the EPA, than Cleaner Air or complying with Federal Law. Maybe its time for President Trump to Man Up, and tell Scott Pruitt to hit the road. All the secrecy, all the secret deals, why can't Scott's actions stand the light of day? All of us need a real Environmental Protection Agency, not an "Oil Protection Agency" run by oil's Cheer Leader, Scott Pruitt, running the sham of a Environmental Protection Industry. I'm not in favor of returning to the EPA that we had, running everyone's business, but we do need an EPA that is genuinely interested in a cleaner environment.
  • Disappointed on May 31 2018 said:
    Could....... But Won't

    Oil could clean up our fuels and air with ethanol...... But Won't

    You can clean up a Pig, but they will always go back to the mud hole.

    Oil is like a barn yard pig,

    Refiner's preference to sell carcinogens like Benzene for octane, rather than clean burning ethanol, shows just how ugly this industry really is.

    Profit crazed ugly.

    Their owners should be ashamed.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News