• 2 minutes Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 4 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 7 minutes Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 9 hours Joe Biden the "Archie Bunker" of the left selects Kamala Harris for VP . . . . . . Does she help the campaign ?
  • 2 hours Tesla Begins Construction Of World’s Largest Energy Storage Facility
  • 16 hours Trump Hands Putin Major Geopolitical Victory
  • 59 mins America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 10 hours Those Nasty White People and Camping Racism
  • 5 hours Will any journalist have the balls to ask Kamala if she supports Wall Street "Carried Interest" Tax Loophole
  • 3 hours In 1,267 days, Trump has made 20,055 false or misleading claims
  • 5 hours COVID&life and Vicious Circle: "Working From Home Is Not Panacea For Virus"
  • 16 mins Buying votes is cool now.
  • 28 mins Candidate Biden refuses to answer questions and hides from public. If u could, what questions would you ask him
  • 11 hours The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 20 hours Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 2 days China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 1 day Oil Tanker Runs Aground in Mauritius - Oil Spill
  • 2 days Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations

This Oilfield Services Company Is A Buy

This morning, oilfield services giant Schlumberger (SLB) announced results for Q2 2017. SLB has dropped around twenty-five percent since the beginning of the year as the effects of the capex cuts by oil companies following crude’s collapse started to bite, and this morning’s numbers looked on the surface like more of the same. Read a little deeper, however, and there is good reason for optimism. That, combined with the type of technical setup that regular readers will know I favor, convinces me that SLB is a great buy at these levels for short and long-term investors alike.

First, the bad news. Schlumberger once again posted a net loss for the quarter, this time of $74 million, or 5 cents per share. That sounds bad, but compared to the $2.16 billion loss in the same quarter of 2016 it is a spectacular result. Adjusted earnings were positive, showing a profit of $0.35 per share on revenue of $7.46 billion, both of which beat expectations handily. That has caused the stock to trade a little higher early this morning, but when you look at the 1 year chart below it is obvious that move won’t put a dent in the recent declines.

However, what traders and investors should bear in mind here is that oil companies’ capex spending tends to change course a little like an aircraft carrier. Most firms learned a long time ago that reacting too quickly to fluctuations in the volatile oil markets is a bad idea: it creates confusion and ultimately ends…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News