• 2 minutes Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 4 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 7 minutes Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 40 mins China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 2 hours Joe Biden the "Archie Bunker" of the left selects Kamala Harris for VP . . . . . . Does she help the campaign ?
  • 7 hours Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 1 day US will pay for companies to bring supply chains home from China: Kudlow - COVID-19 has highlighted the problem of relying too heavily on one country for production
  • 3 days Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 3 days China's impending economic meltdown
  • 23 mins Trump Hands Putin Major Geopolitical Victory
  • 16 hours Trump is turning USA into a 3rd world dictatorship
  • 7 hours Oil Tanker Runs Aground in Mauritius - Oil Spill
  • 41 mins COVID&life and Vicious Circle: "Working From Home Is Not Panacea For Virus"
  • 2 days Liquid Air Battery
  • 2 days What the heroin industry can teach us about solar power (BBC)
  • 3 days The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
Oil Rallies Despite String Of Bearish News

Oil Rallies Despite String Of Bearish News

Oil prices reversed course and…

Arthur Berman

Arthur Berman

Arthur E. Berman is a petroleum geologist with 36 years of oil and gas industry experience. He is an expert on U.S. shale plays and…

More Info

Premium Content

The Death Of U.S. Oil

It’s game-over for most of the U.S. oil industry.

Prices have collapsed and storage is nearly full. The only option for many producers is to shut in their wells. That means no income. Most have considerable debt so bankruptcy is next.

Peggy Noonan wrote in her column recently that “this is a never-before-seen level of national economic calamity; history doesn’t get bigger than this.” That is the superficial view.

Coronavirus has changed everything. The longer it lasts, the less the future will look anything like the past.

Most people, policy makers and economists are energy blind and cannot, therefore, fully grasp the gravity or the consequences of what is happening.

Energy is the economy and oil is the most important and productive portion of energy. U.S. oil consumption is at its lowest level since 1971 when production was only about 78% of what it was in 2019. As goes oil, so goes the economy…down.

The old oil industry and the old economy are gone. The energy mix that underlies the economy will be different now. Oil production and prices are unlikely to regain late 2018 levels. Renewable sources will fall behind along with efforts to mitigate climate change.

It’s Really Bad

2020 global liquids demand may average 20 mmb/d less than in 2019 (Figure 1). This estimate is really a thought experiment because it is impossible to know what supply and demand are in the present much less in the next quarter or beyond. This is a time of unimaginable flux and uncertainty because no one knows how long economic activity will be depressed, how long it will take to recover or if it will recover.

The estimate in Figure 1 differs from most forecasts in two important ways. First, I believe that supply will fall much faster than most other sources. That is because storage will soon be full and shutting in production will be the only option for many producers.

Figure 1. 2020 global oil demand may average 20 million barrels per day lower than in 2019.

Source: OPEC, IEA, Vitol, Trafigura, Goldman Sachs and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Second, I doubt that there will be a demand recovery in the third quarter despite the re-opening of businesses in the second. That is because we are in a global depression. Unemployment will remain high and consumers will be damaged from lack of income over the months of quarantine. The truth is that I doubt that demand will ever recover.

Economies will re-start slowly. A useful analogy is being at a traffic light behind 25 stopped cars. The light will change from green to red before your car begins to move. It may take several light changes before you get to the other side of the intersection.

U.S. consumption has fallen about 30% from 20 mmb/d in January to 14 mmb/d in April. Refinery intakes are already 25% lower than in the first quarter of the year and will fall further as consumption decreases. Refineries will close.

Most U.S. refineries require intermediate and heavy crude oil that must be imported. Few U.S. grades of oil can be used to produce diesel without blending them with imported oil. That is because they are too light to contain the organic compounds need to make diesel. Redesigning refineries will not change this.

Premium: The Oil Sector That Will Suffer The Most

The world’s natural resource extraction, shipping and distribution system relies on diesel. As refineries close and less diesel is produced, there will be lower levels of natural resource extraction, less manufacturing and less buying of goods.

Diesel cannot be produced without first producing gasoline. The U.S. has had a gasoline surplus since late 2014 and the current surplus is the highest in 5 years (Figure 2).

Figure 2. U.S. gasoline comparative inventory has increased 30 million barrels since March 20 to a record level of 28.4 million barrels more than the five-year average.

Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Diesel demand is less elastic than gasoline demand because of its critical role in heavy transport. What will happen to the excess produced gasoline if storage is full? Will it be burned?

Those who see an opportunity for renewable energy in the demise of oil need to think again. The manufacture of solar panels, wind turbines and electric cars depend on diesel all along the supply chain from extraction to distribution of finished products. A world in economic depression will default to the cheapest and most productive fuels. Oil will be cheap and abundant for a long time. There will be little money or appetite for the massive equipment changes that renewable sources require. Climate change will not be high in the consciousness of people struggling to survive.

Figure 3 is another thought experiment in which I use tight oil rig count and output to estimate forward levels of U.S. production. The normal trajectory is an estimate of how production might decline as rigs are idled from lack of capital investment. It suggests that tight oil production might decrease by about 50% from 7 to 3.5 mmb/d by July 2021.

Figure 3. Thought experiment based on rig count through April 2020 and 12-month lagged production.

Source: Baker Hughes, EIA DPR, Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The shut-in trajectory suggests that tight oil production may fall below 3 mmb/d by June of this year. Since tight oil accounts for about 55% of U.S. output, total crude oil and condensate production could decline from 12 mmb/d to 5.5 mmb/d by the end of the first half of 2020. This estimate is much more aggressive than EIA forecasts because EIA hasn’t adequately modeled the speed of shut in production with full storage levels.

Energy is the Economy

Gross domestic product (GDP) is proportional to oil consumption (Figure 4). That’s because oil is the economy. Every aspect of production and use of goods and services requires burning fossil energy. There are approximately 4.5 years of human labor in a barrel of oil (N. J. Hagens, personal communication and The Oil Drum). No other energy source comes close to that level of energy density.

Figure 4. Gross domestic product (GDP) is proportional to oil consumption

Source: EIA, World Bank and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Those who believe that the world will function the same on lower energy density sources like wind and solar should review their old physics text books. You cannot fit 4.5 years of work from sunlight or wind into the 5.6 cubic feet space of a barrel of oil.

Seventeen investment analysts recently estimated that U.S. GDP would contract an average of 30-35% in 2020 (Figure 5) within a range of 9-50%. The correlation shown in Figure 4 suggests it will decrease by about 20-25% based on estimated decrease in U.S. oil consumption. Any value within this spectrum is catastrophic.

Premium: 2 Stocks To Consider As Oil Nears $15

Figure 5. U.S. GDP to contract 30-35% in 2020 based on estimates by seventeen investment analysts

Source: Charles Schwab and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Economist Lawrence Summers has warned that the U.S. financial system may collapse because of cascading defaults. Approximately 25% of U.S. renters did not pay their landlords and 23% of Americans did not make their mortgage payment in April. When people don’t pay their creditors, creditors in turn cannot pay their creditors. For comparison, a 28% mortgage default rate contributed to the 2008 financial collapse.

Joseph Stiglitz recently explained that the current pandemic will affect the developing world more severely than it has developed countries. It might lead to mass migration problems that could dwarf the dislocations of the last six years out of Africa and the Middle East.

Slouching Toward Bethlehem

Many will probably find my analysis overly pessimistic. Crude oil markets do not. Negative WTI futures prices last week could not have sent a stronger signal for producers to cease and desist.

Large segments of the U.S. oil industry will have to be nationalized before the year is over. The price of oil is too low to justify the cost of extraction even if storage were available. The value of a barrel of oil, however, is 4.5 man-years of work and that productivity multiplier will be essential if the U.S. economy is to avoid collapse or for it to recover if collapse is unavoidable.

The United States has engaged in the foolish practice of draining America first since the beginning of tight oil production a decade ago. There was value up to the point that domestic oil substituted for imported light oil but exporting more was dumb. That is true especially now that someone else’s oil will be cheap to buy for years.

There are few moments when we may truly say that things are different now. This is one of those moments. We do not know what awful form the future may take, what rough beast slouches toward Bethlehem to be born.

The game is over for oil. We should place all of our attention on saving the economy.

I hope that we learn to view what is happening as a chance to simplify and to learn to be satisfied with no more than what we need. It is unlikely that we will have much choice.

By Art Berman for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Robert Berke on April 28 2020 said:
    Berman is the gold standard for geologist, and whether we agree or not, his ideas need to be taken seriously.
  • Jotes on April 29 2020 said:
    great article
  • Dan Pearson on April 29 2020 said:
    Art Berman has been correct about the US shale oil industry since he pointed out that shale oil wasn't profitable even back when crude oil was at $100/bbl in 2014.Shale oil was supported by ZIRP $, then by Wall Street equity, then by loads of debt.

    The US flooded the world with surplus high cost shale oil which wasn't economic in the 1st place.
    Art's statement that the shale oil revolution is not a revolution, its more like a retirement party is on the mark.

    US shale driller/producers want prices high so they can produce expensive shale oil, yet they over produce causing world oil prices to collapse. You cannot have it both ways.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on April 29 2020 said:
    The author is indeed very pessimistic. Still, I agree with him that the coronavirus outbreak will change our way of life in more ways than one.

    However, the game will never be over for oil throughout the 21st century and probably far beyond because this would mean the end of the global economy and, dare say, civilization as we know it and enjoy it
    .
    One thing the coronavirus outbreak has proven irrevocably is how inseparable oil and the global economy are by demonstrating that destroying one automatically destroys the other and vice versa.

    And despite a lot of pontification from energy experts, global oil markets will resume their business as usual once the global lockdown starts to ease. Once the global economy is back in business, the coronavirus will fade into a distant memory.

    And whilst the outbreak has inflicted very heavy damage on both the global economy and the global oil market, once the outbreak is controlled, the global economy and China’s in particular will behave like a patient who has been quarantined with no food. Once out of the quarantine, his appetite would be rapacious and this is exactly how the global economy and the global oil market will react with oil imports doubling if not tripling to recoup lost demand. Oil prices and demand will recoup all their previous losses with prices event touching $50-$60 a barrel in the second half of this year.

    As for the US shale oil industry, the die is cast. Since its inception in 2008, it has been an unprofitable industry. If it was judged by the strict commercial criteria by which other successful companies are judged, it would have been declared bankrupt years ago.

    US shale oil producers have been for years taking advantage of OPEC+’s production cuts to enhance their market share at the expense of OPEC+ members by producing excessively even at a loss and undermining OPEC+ efforts to support oil prices by trying to cap them. Shale oil producers didn’t even spare a thought for other oil-producing nations of the world whose livelihood they have trampled on for years with the full knowledge that US tax payers will bail them out even when their outstanding debts are heading towards $1 trillion. They had a chance recently to redeem themselves by agreeing to cut production and join OPEC+ efforts to stabilize oil prices but they adamantly refused. They continued to show the ugly face of capitalism. They paid for their greed and obstinacy by the recent collapse of the WTI crude oil price to less than $1 a barrel.

    The recent collapse of the WTI price is a unique American failure story. Still, the level of the WTI oil price collapse was very unusual. US shale oil producers have been facing unusual problems, namely rising outstanding debts almost reaching one trillion dollars, inability to export their oil or selling it at home because of the current circumstances and lack of their own storage. Renting storage outside would have cost them far more the contract price for their oil in the current situation. So they had to either give it away or sell it at any price.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Robert Ballantyne on April 29 2020 said:
    Yes the folly of closing everything down has consequences. The folly of what gets closed down (work for average people) and what does not get suspended (payments by average people to creditors) due to lobbyist making sure the burden is placed on the shoulders of the lower middle class ..... (see credit bankruptcy changes they lobbied for and received the last time they fleeced the lower middle class into indentured servitude) What was done has been uneconomic and ineffective..... they destroyed an economy out of fear of the unknown.

    The winners will be the cities that spent poorly, managed money poorly and will have their pension bailed out by ...... yes the lower middleclass. Someday this group will get tired of being bent over the desk and put a stop to being fleeced.

    Nice write up .... very nice work.
  • Robert Berke on April 29 2020 said:
    It’s interesting to see to see a leading energy website, like Oilprice, featuring two opposing articles at the same time.
    One article written by geologist with Berman predicted that oil would never again see high prices, and the industry would like collapse, along with the US economy.

    While on the same website, another feature article states that hedge funds are loading up on future contracts, anticipating an oil price recovery very soon.

    What to make of it. Do we load up or run for our lives? Each side has convincing arguments. In the field of science, I would probably lean towards, Berman. But in the finance world, I tend to listen to the traders.

    The reason is that the traders, big time gamblers though they are, but unlike Casino gambler who take short odds against the house, hedge fund gamblers always go with the best history-based probabilities.

    Those probabilities say that in the last twenty years, at least six major global virus outbreaks, that threatened to become pandemics were all successfully contained, while every recession was followed by record breaking economic numbers.

    The scientist says this time it’s different, the system is permanently broken. He buttresses his arguments with strong and convincing examples of a currently failing industry.

    Berman believes that the current downturn has systematically and permanently injured the oil industry. No one is arguing that the collapse is not happening. But even if all of Berman’s examples, are true, as I think they are, they are still only one time events, and most are fixable by rising prices, that every single recovery has brought.
  • James Hilden-Minton on April 30 2020 said:
    Oil is not as important to GDP as Berman makes it out to be. Simply try regression real global GDP growth on both growth in electricity generation and growth in crude production. One sees that electricity, not oil is the dominant driver of economic growth. The coefficient for electricity is about 1, while for oil it is about 0.5. Also oil is only marginally statistically significant after accounting for electricity. It is electricity that really drives the economy. Switching from use of oil to use of electricity is beneficial for achieving higher rates of economic growth.

    Another point here is that if on examines the differential sensitivity of GDP growth by type of fuel used for power generation, there is no statistical difference between renewables, coal or gas power generation. It's all equally useful for growing the global economy.

    So Berman is simply wrong about renewables being inferior to oil for growing the economy. Electricity is twice as potent for economic growth than oil, and it does not matter where the electricity comes from. So yes wind and solar can and do drive economic growth.
  • Richard Stafford on April 30 2020 said:
    It would be easier to feel sorry for the oil industry if we weren't being gouged at the pump by the refinery companies..

    If supply and demand equals cost then we should be paying a lot less for gas especially when so many consumers are out of work themselves and saving every penny they can.
  • Dean Koutroulis on May 01 2020 said:
    Doom and failure.
  • John Shearson on May 03 2020 said:
    I don't actually understand the point of the article. So...... That's it. An entire industry is done. We are again beholden to middle eastern powers? I don't believe it for a second. The entrepreneurial spirit of the American oil man is second to none.
  • michael schratter on May 03 2020 said:
    Wells shuttered and moth-balled, machinery idle, roughnecks laid off by the tens of thousands, capital investments near zero, and Greta et al magnifying a growing distaste for hydrocarbons, thus accelerating the exiting of sovereign funds and pension plans towards something more ESG.

    And yet all the while, outside of this anomaly that is 2020, year after year oil consumption rates continue to rise. Simply put, the 4 billion that reside in China, Africa, India, and SE Asia are getting wealthier and thus their energy needs are growing at a faster rate than the global adoption of green energy. We are at least a decade away before oil consumption rates even plateau.

    The cure to low prices is low prices. And with a little patience, the laws of supply and demand will prevail.

    It’s all turning out to be a contrarian’s wet dream… and I for one am loading up on the oil blue chips.
  • Thomas Franklin on May 04 2020 said:
    Berman said: Few U.S. grades of oil can be used to produce diesel without blending them with imported oil. My response: Import Western Canadian Select from Canada. Berman said: That is because they are too light to contain the organic compounds need to make diesel. My response: Import WCS from Canada. Berman said: Redesigning refineries will not change this. My response: Import WCS from Canada. That's what's happening now. Hopefully it will happen more in the future. By train and by pipeline. Good news for Canada and good news for the USA. Is there really a problem?
  • Gary Ward on May 18 2020 said:
    I love Arthur's graphs and thoughtful logic but his long term Nat Gas predictions have been horrible. In his defense, most analyst and insiders have also been wrong. I have always found one statement to be true, " The cure for high prices is high prices, and the cure for low prices, is low prices".
    The game may be over for some oil companies but those that survive will be stronger without the extra competition.
  • Rudolf Huber on July 08 2020 said:
    Some people don't see the forest because they stare at one tree all the time. The biggest reason why US shale is going to come back from the ashes bigger and stronger is that cheap oil is over all over the world. Look at those new fields: the deep Arctic, deep water, sour oil, super heavy oil, challenging locations, ... You name it. There are still wells that produce moderately priced oil but the new stuff is on the pricey side. And among the pricey crudes shale is on the cheaper side. Those changes often take many years or more than a decade to filter through - this is the longterm nature of oil. But they always do. I am not worried about shale.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News