• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 3 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 57 mins How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 1 day Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 13 days What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 1 day The U.S. Is Determined to Revolutionize Its Microchip Industry
  • 11 days A question...
  • 15 days Why does this keep coming up? (The Renewable Energy Land Rush Could Threaten Food Security)
  • 16 days They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
Asian Refiners Diversify Away from Middle Eastern Oil

Asian Refiners Diversify Away from Middle Eastern Oil

Asian refiners are reducing their…

Oil Ticks Higher on Inventory Draw

Oil Ticks Higher on Inventory Draw

Crude oil prices moved higher…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Oil And Gas Still Drawing In Investors Despite Transition

  • The Financial Times reported this month that fundraising activity among independent exploration and production companies in the United States has picked up this year.
  • Buybacks and rising dividend payouts make the oil and gas sector popular again among investors.
  • Most observers seem to agree that the key factor that made oil and gas attractive again, besides the fundamental nature of the products, was the pivot towards capital discipline.
Wall St

Oil and gas stocks were among the top performers on the S&P 500, with four industry players taking their place in the top 10. The reason for this was a higher price for oil coupled with enhanced volatility. But this is just one aspect of the story.

While higher oil prices were pushing up the stocks of energy companies, some were tapping equity and debt markets for fundraising and, unlike the past few years, were getting a positive response.

To make matters even clearer, investors appear to be hanging on to their oil and gas investments despite bankers’ warnings that the latest cycle in the industry may be drawing to a close, with returns likely to start falling. But bankers may be living in the past; oil and gas are hot again.

The Financial Times reported this month that fundraising activity among independent exploration and production companies in the United States has picked up this year on both equity and debt markets. And those markets were responding enthusiastically to the opportunity to fund companies from an industry that has been slammed as the single culprit behind the changing climate of the planet.

What makes the trend even more impressive, however, is that it comes at a time when banks themselves are reportedly making more money from loans and bond underwriting for so-called green companies than from the oil industry.

Bloomberg reported on that development this week, citing data showing that fees from “climate-focused financing” so far this year had reached $2.5 billion. Meanwhile, fees from oil and gas loans and bond underwriting stood at $2.2 billion.

It seems all the incentives that governments in Europe and the U.S. are giving to low-carbon industries are working, and businesses are raising money eagerly. But while that would suggest oil and gas are falling out of the favor of banks, the FT report about capital markets suggests otherwise, supported by another analysis by Bloomberg showed this week that investment funds are gobbling up energy stocks.

The report cited a note by Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett saying that “fund managers shifted from an 1% underweight allocation on energy stocks to an 8% overweight stance in October, the most bullish allocation since March.”

Not just that, but the change came amid warnings from Hartnett colleagues that the latest price rally was about to run out, and it was time to get out of oil. These analysts have been downgrading U.S. oil and gas players and doubting the valuations of companies active in the Permian. Meanwhile, Exxon struck a $60-billion takeover deal with Permian-focused Pioneer Natural Resources, which was unlikely to have escaped investors’ attention.

It appears that said investors are more interested in action than in talk. While bankers are talking about the cycle coming to an end, investors are probably watching the situation in the Middle East and OPEC’s seemingly unwavering determination to keep prices where they, rather than the free market, want them to be. They may also be watching dividend updates during financial report presentations. And they must like what they see.

“Companies are really keeping their focus on shareholder returns. They’re very disciplined, they’re making the right decisions by paying out dividends and buying back shares. This is winning the investors back to the sector,” Josh Martin, managing director at Pickering Energy Partners, told the FT.

The report cited news of two listings in the sector this year, with both companies—Kodiak Gas Services and Atlas Energy Solutions—starting out modestly but gaining 11% and 20%, respectively, after the listings.

This is, of course, nowhere near the stratospheric gains some tech companies have made during their debut, but it is significant nevertheless: there is so much hype around tech while oil and gas are basically a pariah industry. Or so some thought.

Right now, hedge funds are taking short positions on ESG stocks, sniffing for so-called greenwashing claims and inflated valuations, Bloomberg reported last month. It cited a Texas-based fund manager as saying there was a lot of capital “chasing” ESG assets, but good ideas in that space were few and far between in what sounds like a classic bubble situation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The situation with oil and gas investing—and fundraising—might very well be the result of a convergence of factors. There are oil prices, of course, but there is also that growing skepticism about ESG claims made by various companies in order to attract investment, and the certainty of oil and gas dividends and the quite high possibility of continued share buybacks.

Most observers seem to agree that the key factor that made oil and gas attractive again, besides the fundamental nature of the products, was the pivot towards capital discipline that did not waver even when the price rose so high they would have absolutely justified a boost in production—from a short-term perspective.

Yet the industry, specifically in the U.S. shale patch, has repeatedly indicated over the past two years that it has adopted a more long-term perspective and is no longer chasing the immediate but short-lived benefits of a production boost in response to a price rise. Investors evidently appreciate this change of focus.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on October 22 2023 said:
    At the height of the COVID pandemic in 2020 when environmental activists and the likes of IEA, BP, Rystad Energy and other European supermajors were claiming that peak oil demand is either behind us or very close, I said that oil and the global economy are inseparable. Destroy one you destroy the other and vice versa.

    How absolutely wrong they were proven and how absolutely right I was and still are.

    Investors the world over always seek to secure the best return on their investments. What could be better, more secure and more profitable than investing oil in a commodity that will be with us well into the future and in an industry which is the most successful and also the profitable in the world like the global oil industry.

    Another source of support for investing in oil is that a total global energy transition is a myth. It will never ever happen. The reason is that renewables on their own are incapable of either satisfying global electricity demand or even running a small economy.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert
  • Mike Lewicki on October 22 2023 said:
    no transition period

    oil demand will grow with 8.7 billion people on earth ???? by 3030.

    why don't you write about that.

    those new people will consume oil and gas as the products they buy are made or transported by oil and gas.

  • Kay Uwe Boehm on October 23 2023 said:
    Previously checked, methane above equatorially was probably rising from desertification at the Aral Sea below, etc. but mainly from an increase in natural gas utilization with slippage.
    Natural gas deposits can accidentally fizzle out until they close again in the event of fracking and can be switched off immediately.
    Flaring has been done for a long time to reduce oil.
    The more methane, the more degradation like with CO2.

    CO2 increase approx. +2ppm per year no danger more positive than negative as a fertilizer and warmer better than colder with more heating costs, agricultural damage, black ice etc. plus more evaporation in seas so more precipitation over land limited by fossil production maximum and what do reductions contribute 550 Gt natural turnover/year and worldwide increase in the use of fossil fuels. In terms of geological history, CO2 decreased in the time of the dinosaurs at around 2800 ppm.

    When floating ice in the Arctic melts in summer, sea levels do not rise and infrared night radiation and photodynthesis increase.

    Temperature of the world's oceans with deep seas increased by

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News