• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 8 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 7 hours White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 22 hours NYT: Mass Immigration Roundups in U.S. to Start Sunday
  • 1 hour Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 14 hours Carrot And Stick: North Korea Suggests It Might Lift Weapons Test moratorium
  • 14 hours Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 7 hours Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 10 hours South Korea imports No Oil From Iran in June - First-Half Imports Fall 37%
  • 1 hour A Silence is heard
  • 14 hours Starlink Internet Courtesy of Tesla
  • 1 day U.S.- Taiwan: China Says Will Freeze Out U.S. Companies That Sell Arms To Taiwan
  • 1 day U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
  • 15 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
Alt Text

Libya’s Oil Revenue Takes A Beating

Libya’s oil revenue fell significantly…

Alt Text

1 Million Bpd At Risk In Gulf Of Mexico Tropical Storm

Oil producers are beginning to…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Premium Content

OPEC+ Succeeds, What’s Next For Oil?

Oil prices spiked on Friday on news from Vienna.

OPEC+ managed to pull off an eleventh-hour agreement, checking all the boxes after a contentious set of meetings. There were a lot of competing interests at play, but the agreement offers a little bit of everything, enough for all parties to walk away satisfied.

The headliner is the 1.2 million-barrel-per-day (mb/d) cut beginning in January, with a review scheduled for April. OPEC will shoulder 800,000 bpd of the total, and non-OPEC countries will take on the other 400,000 bpd. The baseline used to measure the cuts is October production levels.

The cut is larger than some analysts had expected, especially given the rumors swirling on Thursday about a cut of around 1 mb/d. In fact, one could argue that the group cleverly managed market expectations, lowering them on Thursday only to surprise the market with a larger cut on Friday. Prior to the meeting 1.2 mb/d might have been considered a middle-of-the-road cut, but after the seemingly tumultuous set of meetings on Thursday and early Friday, a 1.2 mb/d cut ends up looking like a highly successful result.

Iran had held up the talks early Friday. Saudi Arabia pushed for them to agree to a symbolic cut, an odd position given that Iran’s output at this point is far below capacity and far below its prior ceiling. Iran, with good reason, argued that it should not have to sign on to any cuts, especially since sanctions are likely going to curtail output even further in the months ahead.

The rumors on Friday were that the holdup could sink a deal, but that was never going to be the case. It’s extremely hard to imagine Saudi Arabia walking away from a deal that included meaningful cuts from other producers just because Iran wouldn’t symbolically cut their output. Related: Oil Prices Hold Steady As U.S., Canadian Oil Rig Count Take Steep Dive

Ultimately, the result was a quirky one. All countries appear to be participants in the deal, but there won’t be country-specific quotas. Iran did not receive an official “exemption,” some OPEC officials argued, even as the Iranians claimed they did. Other officials said that there would be “special considerations.” This point is a matter of splitting hairs – Iran’s production is likely to fall in the coming months; it doesn’t really matter what they call it. That’s also why this issue was not going to be the thing that sunk the entire deal.

Oil prices spiked on the news, with Brent up around 5 percent immediately after the agreement was announced.

Russia, as expected, played a pivotal role in the deal, and its willingness to go along with a larger-than-expected cut was the key factor in the 1.2 mb/d reduction (although Russia’s precise contribution was not known at the time of this writing).

The deal can be called a success for two reasons. First, it takes 1.2 mb/d off of the market beginning in January, which will go a long way to erasing the surplus. Second, it removes a great deal of uncertainty about what to expect in the near future. Oil prices have been all over the map in the last few months, with Saudi production surging at a time when U.S. shale was also defying expectations. Now, it’s reasonable to assume that any surplus or deficit won’t be so large as to lead to dramatic price swings, at least in the short run. Related: Could Iraq Be The Next OPEC Member To Exit?

However, the one remaining piece of uncertainty is how, or if, the U.S. government will react. President Trump has repeatedly demanded low oil prices, and tweeted as recently as Wednesday to that effect. Typically, OPEC would not be all that sensitive to Trump’s demands, but Saudi Arabia is reeling after the international outrage over the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. A bipartisan movement in Washington is upping the pressure on Riyadh, and Trump has been one of the few friends Saudi Arabia has left.

If oil prices rise too much, Trump might lash out and dump the Saudis, although what that means in practice is very much unclear. Due to extreme budgetary pressure from low oil prices, Saudi Arabia had no choice but to risk Trump’s ire and push for meaningfully supply curbs.

For now, OPEC+ is likely patting themselves on the back. They reached an agreement that is mostly acceptable to everyone, oil prices are up, the surplus will narrow significantly and uncertainty is greatly diminished.

Notably, the agreement calls for a review in April. The timing is not coincidental – U.S. waivers granted to eight countries importing Iranian oil expire in May. By April, everyone will know much more about what direction Washington intends to go in, and how much oil Iran will lose. If Iranian exports are rapidly falling to zero, OPEC+ would have time to unwind the production cuts.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • John Doe on December 09 2018 said:
    To what degree can Trump really get tough on KSA over high oil price?
    His Tweets are useless as proven by the defiant OPEC+ cut.
    The forthcoming sanction over the journalist killing is likely symbolic.
    Getting materially tough on KSA would mean one thing: package up KSA nicely with a ribbon and deliver it to Kremlin.
    The warm reception between MBS and Putin at G-20 is meant to show to the world that the U.S. is *NO LONGER* the only game in town.
  • John Brown on December 09 2018 said:
    Same old game. Oil prices drop after pure greed pushed prices too high to be sustainable & the we get the same old game to push prices back up even though oil is sloshing around all over the world, global growth is slowing, & US production is soaring! And of course the cut in production just puts that capacity into idle. It doesn’t just disappear & who knows who many will cheat? Hopefully it will increase the price of WTI to about $55 to $60. The will ensure US production continues to soar. Of course as the price moves up GREED usually kicks in & they keep gimmicking it up until it cuts off growth. It will be interesting to watch!
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on December 10 2018 said:
    Once under stress, it OPEC delivers most of the time. The agreement by OPEC and non-OPEC members to cut 1.2 million barrels a day (mbd) is a practical one which will arrest the decline of oil prices and reduce the glut in the global oil market thus supporting oil prices. It is also a correction of a mistake made in June by Saudi Arabia (under pressure from President Trump) and Russia (for reasons of its own) to add 650,000 barrels a day (b/d) jointly to the global market thus adding to an already existing small glut.

    One can’t but notice the pivotal role Russia has been playing in OPEC decisions and its growing influence in the global oil market. In effect, Russia’s influence on OPEC decisions is now far bigger than the overwhelming majority of OPEC members. Its collaboration with Saudi Arabia is influencing the global oil market but this sometimes goes contrary to the interests of the OPEC members as was the case in June.

    Saudi Arabia has shown again that it can resist pressure from President Trump when its national interests are involved.

    As for Iran, US sanctions have so far failed to cost it a single barrel of its oil exports. And once again I express the view that the issuing of US waivers to eight buyers of Iranian crude who didn’t need them in the first place and who would have continued buying Iranian crude with or without waivers is the clearest admission by the Trump administration that the zero exports option is beyond their reach and that US sanctions are doomed to fail. Everything else is self-delusion and wishful thinking.

    Join Our Community
    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play