• 3 minutes Looming European Gas Crisis in Winter and North African Factor - a must read by Cyril Widdershoven
  • 7 minutes "Biden Targets Another US Pipeline For Shutdown After 'Begging' Saudis For More Oil" - Zero Hedge Monday Nov 8th
  • 12 minutes "UN-Backed Banker Alliance Announces “Green” Plan to Transform the Global Financial System" by Whitney Webb
  • 49 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 2 days China's aggression is changing the nature of sovereignty.
  • 4 days Building A $2 Billion Subsea Solar Power Cable From Chile To China
  • 1 day Ukrainian Maidan after 8 years
  • 3 days OPEC+ Expects Large Oil Glut In Early 2022
  • 2 days Delta variant in European Union
  • 2 days Hunter Biden Helped China Gain Control of Cobalt Mines in Africa
  • 11 hours Communist China Declared War on the US Long Ago Part 1 of the 2-part series: The CCP's War on America
  • 3 days Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 3 days Microbes can provide sustainable hydrocarbons for the petrochemical industry
  • 3 hours President Biden’s Nuclear Option Against OPEC+ - Waste of Time
  • 15 hours Сryptocurrency predictions
  • 2 days NordStream2
  • 3 days CO2 Electrolysis to CO (Carbon Monoxide) and then to Graphite
  • 4 days Big Bounce: Russian gas amid market tightness - new report by Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
Drilling Is Picking Up In The U.S. Shale Patch

Drilling Is Picking Up In The U.S. Shale Patch

U.S. shale drillers have significantly…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Biden’s Baffling Oil Policy Faces Backlash From All Sides

  • President Biden is in a tight spot when it comes to energy 
  • The White House continues to face critique from both environmentalists and the oil and gas industry
  • If energy demand continues to grow at the current pace, switching from pragmatism to an all-out renewables agenda will be a huge challenge

President Joe Biden and his administration hardly planned for everything that happened this year. In fairness, no administration could have planned for it: soaring oil and gas demand, tight supply, rising prices fueling inflation that has quickly gone from nothing to worry about to the biggest worry for many.

Yet that's not the worst of it for the Biden administration. The president came into office with the pledge to set the United States on a course towards a lower-carbon energy future. This would have been a challenging task even under the best of circumstances, the U.S. being one of the biggest polluters in the world. With the energy crunch, the task becomes almost impossible.

It is no wonder, then, that when Biden started calling on OPEC to boost crude oil production, nervous about rising gas prices at American filling stations, he instantly attracted accusations of hypocrisy. After all, he was pushing an energy transition agenda, he was clearly not in favor of boosting domestic oil production, and one of the first executive orders he signed was the one that killed the Keystone XL pipeline. 

The White House's climate envoy, John Kerry, got asked about Biden's energy policy at the COP26 summit in Glasgow last week. How could the president urge OPEC to pump more oil while campaigning for the phase-out of fossil fuels, the media asked Kerry.

"He's asking them to boost production in the immediate moment," Kerry said in response, as quoted by the Wall Street Journal. "And as the transition cuts in, there won't be that need as you deploy the solar panels, as you deploy the transmission lines, as you build out the grid."

Kerry's statement is in line with Biden's own defense of his latest moves in the energy area.

"On the surface, it seems like an irony," Biden said earlier this month, referring to his call on OPEC+ to add more oil production while heading for COP26 to discuss the reduction of global emissions. "But the truth of the matter is ... everyone knows that idea that we're going to be able to move to renewable energy overnight ... it's just not rational."

Recognizing that the renewable energy transition will not—cannot—happen overnight is a commendable demonstration of pragmatism. It is also a recognition of the fact that people need energy right now, and they must get it from any available source. That the sources at this moment are mostly fossil fuels is an unfortunate fact of life that we simply have to accept and continue working to reduce the demand for these fossil fuels.

This seems to be the line the Biden administration is following, and even its critics would likely agree that it is a pragmatic one. The thing is, however, that pragmatism and hypocrisy are not mutually exclusive. Biden's energy policy has already sparked protests from climate activists, calling for an end to U.S. fossil fuel exports and a ban on fracking. Interestingly enough, a group of congressmen also recently called on the White House to ban oil exports but for a different reason: the legislators argued a ban on exports would ensure a more adequate supply for the domestic market.

Related: Metals Will Be The Oil Of The Future

President Biden is in a tight spot when it comes to energy. When he took office, the plan was to steer the U.S. towards a lower-carbon future using the Democrats' majority in Congress. In reality, the majority is so flimsy that passing any climate-related legislation has been a challenge that has involved a lot of compromises. And then came the energy crunch, which nobody expected. Suddenly, the U.S. needed more of all fossil fuels.

It is an ironic twist that the first year of Biden's presidency is also the first year in which coal consumption in the country is set for a rise since 2014. And it will be a substantial rise: the Energy Information Administration has forecast the U.S. will consume 20 percent more coal than last year.

Yet using coal to generate electricity more affordably is a pragmatic move even if it leads to a rise in U.S. emissions. The rise, the administration would probably argue, will be a temporary problem, and once the crunch is over, we'll go back to our low-carbon agenda.

Yet this is where the bigger problem flashes a fin. The current energy crunch is not only a result of supply shortages. It is also a result of rising energy demand. U.S. producers appear to be unwilling to ramp up production of crude oil to levels that would lower prices at the pump. Gas producers are having a field day exporting a record amount of their product to Asia, where buyers are looking for a bargain—and U.S. gas is a bargain. 

If demand continues to grow at the current pace, switching from pragmatism to energy transition will continue to be a challenge. Over the short term, the challenge will be especially tough: inflation is driving up the prices of renewables, too, and threatening a lot of planned capacity addition projects with cancellation because of surging material and component costs.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • George Kafantaris on November 15 2021 said:
    We should've tapped the oil reserves a month ago. The heck with waiting for OPEC. Let's flood the market NOW.
  • DoRight Deikins on November 15 2021 said:
    SPR is strategic. It has other purposes than trying to reduce the pump price of gasoline.

    Good article. My favorite phrase «flashes a fin». While not much of a fisherman, the phrase is clear in the image it provokes!

    Why ramp up production when the likelihood is being slam-dunked (or being dragged ashore) when govt policy changes.
  • Dan Mullock on November 16 2021 said:
    The Keystone XL was bringing crude from tar sands. Oil techies pls correct me if i am wrong, but i believe that tar sand petroleum provides a very high yield of gasoline, diesel and other similar fuels, much higher than the light crude that Texas fracking provides. So it is particularly ironic and bumbling of Biden to cut that pipeline as it directly impacts portable fuel costs in the US. If my unprofessional math is correct, it would have provided some 24 million gallons per day of incremental portable fuels (30 gallons of fuel extract per barrel, 800k barrels/day). So a big component of the shortfall. That combined with harassing the industry, restricting exploration and extraction, and leaning on banks etc not to provide financing all contribute to an unwillingness to invest in new production and distribution. In the face of rising demand this means will soon see a "Biden gallon" which costs $5 each or more all over the country.
  • steve Clark on November 17 2021 said:
    Opening the SPR would just cause OPEC+ to reduce supply therefore it would have ZERO effect.
  • Terry Garvin on November 26 2021 said:
    This is a great article that gets right to the core problem of energy needs now. I would say going a little further, When we use more energy here and decouple some of our supply issues with china, the net result is going to be much more responsible environmental practices here. I am in favor of any moves to use less energy here and to bring renewable sources online, but not at the expense of strangling the least of our people...

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News