• 3 minutes Is California becoming a National Security Risk to the U.S.?
  • 9 minutes Oil Prices
  • 14 minutes Gaming the Price of Oil
  • 5 mins Could EVs Become Cheaper than ICE Cars by 2023?
  • 11 hours DOW down as tech shares plummet
  • 2 hours MBS Isn't Going Anywhere
  • 8 hours Black (Oil) Market: U.S. Sanctions Russian Companies to Choke Off Oil for Syria
  • 9 hours Santa Drives A Tesla, Not a Sleigh-- I KNEW IT.
  • 38 mins Can U.S. Add "Another Russia" to Oil Supply?
  • 2 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 4 hours France Revolts Against Anti - Carbon Tax
  • 7 hours Why does US never need to have an oil production cut?
  • 6 hours Your idea of oil/gas prices next ten years
  • 10 hours Plastic Myth-Busters
  • 12 hours EVs Set to Become the Biggest Battery Users
  • 11 hours Fishermen Sue Oil Companies Over Rising Ocean Temperatures
Alt Text

Oil Refiners And Farmers Battle Over Biofuels

Trump has agreed to meet…

Alt Text

The U.S. Ethanol Industry Is Under Attack

The U.S. ethanol industry is…

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Trending Discussions

U.S. Poised To Ease Biofuel Quotas

Just as scientists are making leaps and bounds in the technology behind biofuel production, opening the way for cheaper and more efficient clean fuel sources, the United States’ Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is backing further and further away from biofuel quotas. In the same month that scientists have announced a major breakthrough in biomass processing, the EPA has scrapped a plan to raise biofuel quotas in the coming year thanks to pressure from Big Oil.

This month a group of scientists based in the United Kingdom made a breakthrough in biofuel production that will make the process significantly more efficient and environmentally friendly. Their innovation in breaking down biomasses will also lead to better production processes for cosmetics, medicines, and more-easily recycled plastics.

Traditional bioprocessing is extremely costly and time consuming, but the team of scientists from Imperial College London claims to have discovered a way to break down plant-based biomass 30 times faster than current methods. If their new technique is applied industry-wide and clean-burning biofuel becomes the standard, fuel-related carbon emissions could fall a staggering 80 - 100 percent.

However, don’t expect such a sweeping green transition to happen anytime soon. In the same month that Imperial College London published these amazing findings, across the Atlantic we seem to be moving in quite the opposite direction. Just last week the EPA decided to scrap an assertive measure to impose higher biofuel quotas for refiners in 2019.

Less than a month ago, when the EPA’s biofuels quota plan was moving full speed ahead, the future of biofuels looked more promising than ever. After a roller coaster of a year for biofuels under the reign of Scott Pruitt and the Trump administration, things were starting to turn around for renewables. Iowa’s Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, backed by his state’s powerful corn industry, was fighting hard for biofuels and making serious headway. At the same time, the EPA was poised to announce a nearly 20 billion gallon biofuels target. Related: Wood Mackenzie: Global Peak Oil Demand Expected In 2036

Now Pruitt is gone amidst political pressure and a seemingly endless wave of scandals (not to mention being the subject of thirteen federal investigations) and now, thanks to pressure from the oil industry, the plan for higher 2019 biofuel quotas for large refineries has been thrown to the wayside. If successful, the plan would have raising the Obama-era renewable blending requirements from 10.88 percent to 11.76 percent for a reluctant refining industry. This proposal was an effort to make up for the vast biofuels shortcomings brought on by the Trump administration’s waiver-happy EPA, which has granted tens of millions of dollars’ worth of waivers to refineries over the past year.

Many biofuel backers are holding out hope that they will receive a fresh start in a post-Pruitt EPA, once the dust settles. Those optimists may not want to hold their breath. It’s hard to foresee any big turnaround in the immediate future with attorney Andrew Wheeler acting as Pruitt’s stand-in. Wheeler, like Pruitt has a history of skepticism when it comes to climate change, and also like Pruitt leans very conservative. Wheeler also has a cozy past with fossil fuels, having worked as a lobbyist for the coal industry.

It’s been a wild ride for biofuels over the past few years, with amazing advancements in technology like the discoveries of Imperial College London among countless other promising leads, but just as many setbacks with the tremendous force of Big Oil pushing back against any new blending quotas or regulations. For every Chuck Grassley, championing the agricultural industry and biofuels, there are many more Scott Pruitts, Donald Trumps, and Andrew Wheelers, who rail against any regulation especially the green ones, and see biofuels as a major threat to oil, and therefore the entire economy.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Tom on July 17 2018 said:
    In 2016 the EPA approved 19 of 20 Refiner Requests for RVO Waivers totaling 790 Million Renewable Energy Credits, or easier said 790 Million Gallons of Ethanol that didn’t get blended into American Gasoline to replace carcinogenic substances like Benzene used by Refiners for Octane.

    To Date, for 2017 the EPA has approved 29 of 33 Refiner RVO Waiver Requests totaling 1.46 BILLION Renewable Energy Credits, or easier said 1.46 BILLION GALLONS OF ETHANOL THAT WON’T BE USED TO REPLACE CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES LIKE BENZENE, REFINERS PUT IN OUR GASOLINE.

    So, the real question in my mind is, why the EPA is allowing Refiners to Poison the American Public with Aromatic Hydrocarbons like BENZENE, when ethanol, a far better replacement, is readily available?

    Who are these Refiners who really don’t care about our health?

    Well, the EPA says - “That’s Confidential”

    You Bet it is!

    I hope to see William Wehrum, Scott Pruitt replacement, far more interested in Clean Air and Public Health, than Scott Pruitt was.

    That would be - A Breath of Fresh Air!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
-->