• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 7 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 1 day Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 6 days e-truck insanity
  • 3 hours They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
  • 3 days An interesting statistic about bitumens?
  • 8 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 8 days "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)

WoodMac: Fivefold Annual Jump In Global Offshore Wind Is “Unrealistic”

Governments’ collective target to have offshore wind capacity jump fivefold annually by 2030 is unrealistic and would require $27 billion of secured investment by 2026 if it is to meet that growth in annual installations, excluding China, by the end of the decade, Wood Mackenzie said in a new report on Thursday.

Governments in the U.S. and Europe plan to significantly increase offshore wind capacity to boost green energy and reduce dependence on foreign fossil fuel sources.

The Biden Administration alone targets to build 30 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind by 2030. The Administration said in February this year that offshore wind rights in the Gulf of Mexico—the stronghold of the U.S. oil and gas production and export facilities – would contribute to the U.S goals of deploying 30 GW of offshore wind by 2030, as well as 15 GW specifically of floating offshore wind by 2035.

In the UK, the ambition is to deploy up to 50 GW of offshore wind by 2030, with up to 5 GW coming from floating offshore wind. The UK currently has around 14 GW of offshore wind capacity, enough to power over 10 million homes.

Chris Seiple, Vice Chair, Power and Renewables at Wood Mackenzie, co-author of the report, said that “Nearly 80 GW of annual installations to meet all government targets is not realistic, even achieving our forecasted 30 GW in additions will prove unrealistic if there isn’t immediate investment in the supply chain.”

“Adjustments and new policies by governments and developers will be required to transform the supply chain to deliver offshore wind projects at industrial scale,” Seiple added.

Investment is currently difficult to raise, due to low offshore margins, WoodMac says. Moreover, the uncertainty of project timing could result in very different supply-chain needs, the consultancy noted.

“The uncertainty surrounding project timing is a large reason why supply chain participants hesitate to expand further,” said Finlay Clark, Senior Research Analyst at Wood Mackenzie and co-author of the report.

ADVERTISEMENT

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • George Doolittle on August 17 2023 said:
    Onshore wind is for obvious reasons far easier to maintain and sustain...and easier to explain the economics granted Great Britain might be one exception to this latter statement as true.

    Upgrading current build outs of onshore wind generation combined with what Tesla and IBM are doing to tackle the vexing problem of intermittency could create an order of magnitude jump in effective wind power generation combining both mentioned here as well.

    Still...Europe continues to be convulsed by a truly awesome energy crisis #coal_to_Newcastle

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News