• 5 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 9 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 15 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 2 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 2 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 5 hours Petrol versus EV
  • 7 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 20 hours The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
  • 21 hours These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
  • 20 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 13 mins OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 18 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 10 hours E-mopeds
  • 1 hour 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
  • 7 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 1 day Poland signs 20-year deal on U.S. LNG supplies
  • 20 hours Coal remains a major source of power in Europe.
Are Natural Gas Prices Set To Spike?

Are Natural Gas Prices Set To Spike?

Natural gas inventories have plunged…

Would an Arctic Methane Release Spell the End of Human Life on Earth?

Let’s suppose that the Arctic started to degas methane 100 times faster than it is today. I just made that number up trying to come up with a blow-the-doors-off surprise, something like the ozone hole. We ran the numbers to get an idea of how the climate impact of an Arctic Methane Nasty Surprise would stack up to that from Business-as-Usual rising CO2.

Walter et al (2007) says that Arctic lakes are 10% of natural global emissions, or about 5% of total emissions. I believe that was considered to be remarkably high at the time but let’s take it as a given, and representing the Arctic as a whole. If the number of lakes or their bubbling intensity suddenly increased by a factor of 100, and it persisted this way for 100 years, it would come to about 200 Gton of carbon emission, which is on the same scale as our entire fossil fuel emission so far (300 Gton C), or roughly the amount of traditional reserves of natural gas (although I’m not sure where estimates are since fracking) or petroleum. It would be a whopper of a surprise.

Scaling Walter’s Arctic lake emission rates up by a factor of 100 would increase the overall emission rate, natural and anthropogenic, by about a factor of 5 from where it is today. The weak leverage is because the high latitudes are a small source today relative to tropical wetlands and anthropogenic sources, so they have to grow a lot before they make much difference to the sum of all sources.

To view the full article please click here.


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • LindaAmick on July 27 2012 said:
    If the human race brings about its own demise mother nature and earth will go on as if nothing happened.

    Man is the center of nothing. He does not matter in the scheme of the universe.

    I am sad to be a member of a species which contains members who do not view themselves a part of a larger whole. A system where every living thing should be nurtured and cared for.
  • Wayne on March 11 2012 said:
    I'm depressed about how difficult it is to get people to start acting on this serious climate change issues. We are so short sighted and our society seems to be driven by the carbon industries.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News