• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 11 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 6 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 1 hour Iran Captures British Tanker sailing through Straits of Hormuz
  • 56 mins Iran Loses $130,000,000 Oil Revenue Every Day They Continue Their Childish Games . . . .Opportunity Lost . . . Will Never Get It Back. . . . . LOL .
  • 10 hours Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 15 hours Drone For Drone = War: What is next in the U.S. - Iran the Gulf Episode
  • 2 hours Renewables provided only about 4% of total global energy needs in 2018
  • 19 hours Today in Energy
  • 2 days Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 2 days Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 1 day Why Natural Gas is Natural
  • 1 day LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
  • 6 hours U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
Brand New Material Could Lead To Cheaper Solar Cells

Brand New Material Could Lead To Cheaper Solar Cells

New scientific research into organic…

U.S. Assessment Points Finger At Iran for Attack On Tankers

Oil tankers

An early assessment by U.S. authorities has suggested Iran was behind the attack on tankers off the UAE coast at the port of Fujairah, which Saudi Arabia said had damaged two Saudi vessels, the Wall Street Journal reports, quoting a government official.

Yesterday, Saudi reports about the attack, which Riyadh called a sabotage, pushed oil higher as even the slightest indication that tensions may be flaring up in the Middle East, doing its usual job of putting upward pressure on oil benchmarks.

However, neither Saudi Arabia nor the UAE said who was or is most likely to have been behind the attack. The UAE also did not provide any details about the attack saying only that there were no casualties and the port of Fujairah was operating as usual.

Iran, for its part, condemned the attacks and called for an investigation into the event. Interestingly enough, it was Iranian—as well as Lebanese—media that first reported about attacks near Fujairah saying there had been explosions at the port, Ellen R. Wald noted in a report for Forbes yesterday. However, satellite images provided by TankerTrackers.com showed no evidence of explosions in the area.

Things got more confusing after initially neither the UAE authorities nor the Saudis confirmed or denied the reports but later said there had been an act of sabotage without going into details. The UAE sources denied, however, there had been explosions—something easy enough to check.

As usual, social media were quick to react with many blaming the most obvious culprit—Iran—as the “sabotage” came on the heels of U.S. warnings to commercial and military vessels in the Persian Gulf of possible action from Iranian forces. Still, it has yet to be established officially whether Iran would risk tipping the situation further into violence indeed.

The official who spoke to the Wall Street Journal made a point of saying the assessment was not final and declined to speculate about how the United States would respond if this early suggestion is confirmed in later assessments.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play