• 4 minutes Why Trump will win the wall fight
  • 9 minutes Climate Change: A Summer of Storms and Smog Is Coming
  • 12 minutes Maduro Asks OPEC For Help Against U.S. Sanctions
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 11 hours is climate change a hoax? $2 Trillion/year worth of programs intended to be handed out by politicians and bureaucrats?
  • 2 hours Ayn Rand Was Right
  • 1 hour Tension On The Edge: Pakistan Urges U.N. To Intervene Over Kashmir Tension With India
  • 14 mins NZ Oil, Gas Ban Could Cost $30 Bln
  • 2 hours Indian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. OilIndian Oil Signs First Annual Deal For U.S. Oil
  • 1 hour Sanctions or Support: Despite Sanctions, Iran's Oil Exports Rise In Early 2019
  • 1 hour Oil imports by countries
  • 3 hours Solar and Wind Will Not "Save" the Climate
  • 21 hours Some Good News on Climate Change Maybe
  • 13 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 21 hours Expected Breakdown: Israel-Central Europe Summit Canceled After Polish Pullout
U.S. Nuclear Has A Tough Road Ahead

U.S. Nuclear Has A Tough Road Ahead

High-profile disasters and a booming…

The G7 Spends $100 Billion On Fossil Fuel Subsidies

rig

The world’s richest economies still subsidize their oil, gas, and coal use, investing more than US$100 billion annually in subsidies, a report from the Overseas development Institute has revealed.

The authors of the report tracked fossil fuel subsidies for the years 2015 and 2016, and found that on average, during each of these years, the governments of the G7 countries provided at least US$81 billion in fiscal support to the fossil fuel industry as well as another US$20 billion in public finances. The support included both production of oil, gas, and coal, and their use both at home and abroad.

Despite their numerous commitments,” the authors of the report note, “not only have G7 governments taken limited action to address fossil fuel subsidies but they have also failed to put in place any mechanisms to define and document the full extent of their support to oil, gas and coal, or to hold themselves accountable for achieving these pledges.”

The authors made individual scorecards for all members of G7, which showed that France was the best performer in the group, with an overall score of 63 out of 100, while the United States was last with an overall score of 42 out of 100. The authors rated each G7 members on things like transparency, climate change pledges and commitments, and ending support for oil, gas, and coal exploration, production and use for power generation, and other applications.

Related: Why Aren’t Permian Oil Producers Profitable?

This state of affairs does not bode well for the Paris Agreement targets that many have already called unattainable even with stronger government support for climate change tackling initiatives.

The G7 governments agreed in 2009 to start phasing out fossil fuel subsidies and have them completely removed by 2025. There are less than seven years left until that deadline and things are not looking good, the ODI report authors noted. Even France, the leader in fossil fuel subsidy phase-out, still spends US$8 billion annually on them. The United States, on the other hands, splashes as much as US$26 billion annually to prop up fossil fuels.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Jill James on June 04 2018 said:
    The Overseas Development Institute is a Marxist organization that pushes a globalist agenda via faux-environmentalism.

    Did their report include the $Billions collected by G7 governments for gasoline, diesel and petroleum product taxes? No it didn’t. For example, Canadian federal and provincial taxes on petroleum products amounts to about $17 billion annually. In addition, royalties, corporate and income taxes on earnings from the petroleum industry in Canada amount to well over $20 billion annually. This $37 Billion annually is obviously NOT a subsidy. In fact, the opposite is true. The governments of Canada are highly subsidized by fossil fuels!
  • Me on June 04 2018 said:
    The "ODI" which did this study is heavily government funded. What we need to end support for are useless "think tanks" ... especially the globalist socialist variety.
  • Kr55 on June 04 2018 said:
    This number might keep going up. Not only because of generosity, but because of pure need. The more you replace coal/gas power with renewables, the more money you have to give to the gas/coal suppliers to stay alive as backup for when your renewables are not producing. It's the main problem of the energy industry now, the more renewables you have, the more you're taking revenue away from fossil fuel generation. But, you can't let the fossil fuel guys just shut down because you need them on standby as backup. So, you have to give them an incentive to stay and not just give the government the finger and close up shop.
  • James Decker on June 04 2018 said:
    Of course, this is totally false. While the oil industry does receive some tax reductions, it is heavily taxed in all developed countries. There are NO directly subsidies of the type that are routinely given to wind and solar.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News