• 2 hours French Strike Disrupts Exxon And Total’s Oil Product Shipments
  • 4 hours Kurdistan’s Oil Exports Still Below Pre-Conflict Levels
  • 6 hours Oil Production Cuts Taking A Toll On Russia’s Economy
  • 8 hours Aramco In Talks With Chinese Petrochemical Producers
  • 9 hours Federal Judge Grants Go-Ahead On Keystone XL Lawsuit
  • 10 hours Maduro Names Chavez’ Cousin As Citgo Boss
  • 17 hours Bidding Action Heats Up In UK’s Continental Shelf
  • 22 hours Keystone Pipeline Restart Still Unknown
  • 1 day UK Offers North Sea Oil Producers Tax Relief To Boost Investment
  • 1 day Iraq Wants To Build Gas Pipeline To Kuwait In Blow To Shell
  • 1 day Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 1 day German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 1 day Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 1 day Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 2 days Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 2 days Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 2 days Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 2 days Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 2 days Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 2 days Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 2 days Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 2 days U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 3 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 3 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 3 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 3 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 3 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 3 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 6 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 6 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 6 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 6 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 6 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 6 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 6 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 7 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 7 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 7 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 7 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
Tesla Completes World’s Largest Battery

Tesla Completes World’s Largest Battery

In a milestone for lithium…

Chinese Crude Inventories Fall For First Time In 12 Months

Chinese Crude Inventories Fall For First Time In 12 Months

Chinese crude oil inventories have…

Should the UK Help Ban Canada’s Tar Sands from Europe?

Should the UK Help Ban Canada’s Tar Sands from Europe?

The EU is currently discussing a Fuel Quality Directive, which will designate Canada’s tar sands as 22% more polluting than conventional fuels and effectively ban any fuel derived from them from being used in Europe. Canada greatly fears this directive as it would not only cut off a huge market, but could also set a precedent that other countries may follow.

The UK government has been actively supporting Canada’s attempts to prevent this European proposal. Norman Baker, the UK Transport Minister, defends his government’s stance, saying that they want, not just oil sands, but all types of crude oil to be assessed. "To be clear, we are not delaying action in any way, but are seeking an effective solution to address the carbon emissions from all highly polluting crudes, not simply those from one particular country."

To me that sounds just like typical political talk. The sitting on the fence approach, neither supporting nor denouncing Canada’s oil sands, and trying to justify their position by suggesting they are doing it for “the greater good”, to be fairer.

The Lib Dem MEP Chris Davies deplores the UK’s naivety in accepting Canada’s “special pleading as though it were gospel truth” and the Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith has gone as far as to call his government’s position a “disgrace.”

Eight Nobel Laureates, including the Archbishop Desmond Tutu, have now added their weight to the criticisms plaguing the David Cameron’s government. They wrote a letter arguing that "tar sands development is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in Canada, and threatens the health of the planet.” The UK has the power to help pass this new law which would ban such a dirty fuel from Europe.

The European vote is planned to take place on the 23rd February. Reuters has suggested that according to its sources in Europe the vote will likely end in a stalemate.

By. Joao Piexe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Sergio Pereira on February 24 2012 said:
    Most definitely.

    Will the government side with the oil industry or in protecting the environment.

    Tarsands represent "dirty oil", their extraction leads to increased levels of air pollution as well as causing scars to Alberta's landscape.

    It is time to act now to defend our fragile environment for future generations.

    I support the EU's Fuel Quality Directive.
    Do the right thing, show that Europe is taking the lead in protecting the environment.
  • art wissing on February 21 2012 said:
    where are your facts vickie? to back up what you say? you greens use just as much oil as everyone else,every day and more tomorrow. the only way countries develope and raise living standards for everyone is through cheap energy sources.in the ground resources are the only ones that work,for now and decades to come. let me know what day the world used less energy than the day before,i want to mark my calender....
  • jack monath on February 20 2012 said:
    this is the same oil the republicans want to run through our equatic water ways to bring jobs to america, what a sham
  • Victoria Leigh Lustre on February 18 2012 said:
    It is for the greater good that the tarsands stay in the ground. Promoting tarsands is an act of war on the climate and on indigenous people who are dying because of Alberta's greed.
    It is a fact that production and use of the "oil sands" is far more damaging than conventional oil. It is a fact that the rivers around the tarsands are being polluted, not to mention the air and ground. It is a fact that this carbon time-bomb is killing people and wildlife now, not to mention the unknown future death toll.
    The world is watching and we need to send the Canadians a clear message. Tarsands are not in the climate's best interest. Our climate belongs to everyone and no one.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News