• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 1 hour Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 7 hours NYT: Mass Immigration Roundups in U.S. to Start Sunday
  • 3 hours White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 19 hours U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
  • 11 hours South Korea imports No Oil From Iran in June - First-Half Imports Fall 37%
  • 18 hours U.S.- Taiwan: China Says Will Freeze Out U.S. Companies That Sell Arms To Taiwan
  • 5 hours Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 57 mins Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 6 hours Starlink Internet Courtesy of Tesla
  • 12 mins Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 2 days Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 2 days Rising air pollution and green house effect
  • 11 hours A Silence is heard
Fracking Under Fire In California

Fracking Under Fire In California

Despite its shale reserves and…

Coal’s Long Goodbye

Coal’s Long Goodbye

U.S. coal producers continue to…

Nebraska Sticks To Keystone XL Decision

pipeline

The Nebraska Public Service Commission upheld its November decision to allow the construction of the controversial Keystone XL crude oil pipeline, although it demanded a change of its route. Now the watchdog has upheld its decision in the face of opposition from the project developer, TransCanada, which wanted to build the pipeline along a shorter route.

However, Nebraska landowners who had challenged the original route considered the regulator’s decision to be a victory. Lawyers for these landowners told media after the decision was announced that it was the worst possible one for TransCanada. Still, the Canadian company said the change of route will not have an impact on the project costs and they will remain around US$6.3 billion.

Keystone XL is planned to carry Albertan crude through Montana and South Dakota, ending in Nebraska, where it would connect to the existing pipeline network that goes on to the Gulf Coast. It took the project nine years to get the final go-ahead from all authorities concerned, but this doesn’t mean TransCanada’s Keystone XL worries are over.

The company has yet to make the final investment decision on Keystone XL, after it spent four months in open season to see if there is sufficient interest from potential buyers of the crude the pipeline will transport. At the same time, TransCanada is being pressured by Albertan oil producers to make up its mind.

Meanwhile, environmental organizations are suing the presidential administration for failing to make an accurate assessment of the environmental impacts of the project. The Center for Biological Diversity, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said that the case alleged that the U.S. Department of State and other agencies failed to make an adequate environmental review of the project as they based their conclusions on an environmental impact statement from three years ago and failed to take into account important information about the actual environmental impact that the pipeline would have.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play