• 2 minutes U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 5 minutes “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 7 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 3 hours China sends warplanes thru Taiwan airspace. Joe's reponse . . . .
  • 16 mins Biden suspends oil and gas drilling on Federal Lands for 60 days for review.
  • 10 mins Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 17 hours The World Economic Forum & Davos - Setting the agenda on fossil fuels, global regulations, etc.
  • 23 hours Navalny Poisoning Weakens Russo German Relations
  • 9 hours Minerals, Mining and Industrial Ecology
  • 22 hours Here it is, the actual Complaint filed by Dominion Voting Machines against Sydney Powell
  • 1 day Will Empire be brazen about stealing OIL from Venezuela?
  • 12 mins Jim Rickards: Brace for a Great Escape from the Dollar and a Flood of Money into Gold and Bitcoin
  • 37 mins GENERAL NORMAN SCHWARZKOPF: The Third Tour
  • 2 hours Biden's Green Energy Policy
  • 2 hours 'Get A Loan,' Commerce Chief Tells Unpaid Federal Workers
  • 2 days So Is COVID a Media Hoax or Not?
All Eyes Are On This Crucial Pipeline After KeystoneXL Got Axed

All Eyes Are On This Crucial Pipeline After KeystoneXL Got Axed

The Trans Mountain expansion project…

Biden Plans To Kill Keystone XL Oil Pipeline

Biden Plans To Kill Keystone XL Oil Pipeline

U.S. President Joe Biden is…

Judge Dismisses Charges Against Anti-Pipeline Activists

Minnesota state district judge Robert Tiffany has dismissed charges against three climate change activists who shut down two pipelines operated by Enbridge back in 2016. Although they had reason to be happy with the judge’s decision, the defendants were in fact disappointed: the acquittal happened mid-trial, before they had a chance to use their defense, which would have run along the lines of necessity.

The necessity defense is rarely used by attorneys, MPR News reports, and comes down to an argument that a person’s actions, although illegal, were justifiable as they sought to prevent a greater harm. If they were found guilty, the defendants would have faced prison time and fines. However, the judge said their actions had not caused any damage to the infrastructure.

"We did this action two, almost two years ago to the day, Thursday will be the second anniversary, because the problem of climate change is so urgent that we have to start shutting down tar sands pipelines down now," one of the defendants, Emily Johnston told MPR News.

The defendants’ attorney, Lauren Regan, was also disappointed they didn’t get to use the necessity defense. "We, of course, were incredibly excited to put on what would have been the dream necessity defense for the climate movement. Our experts were phenomenal. And you know if we couldn't convince rural community members who doubted the existence of climate change with this group of people we would have really had an uphill battle," she said.

Naturally, Enbridge’s response was very different. In a statement, the company said, "The individuals involved in these activities claimed to be protecting the environment, but they did the opposite and put the environment and the safety of people at risk — including themselves, first responders and neighboring communities and landowners."

A representative of a local pro-pipeline organization commented that the shutdown of a pipeline valve was a dangerous action: "'Turning the valve' was really trying to stop a 1.5-billion-pound batch of oil traveling around 8 miles per hour at one spot with one valve. It would be the same as trying to stop five 100-car trains full of oil at the same time by putting a crossing arm in front of it."

The defendants claimed they had taken precautions before turning the valve—after they called Enbridge to warn them—but never got to share these precautions with the court.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News