• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 12 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 8 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 11 mins Today in Energy
  • 2 days Excellent Choice: Germany's Von der Leyen Secures Powerful EU Executive Top Job
  • 13 hours Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 22 hours Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 23 hours Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 2 days Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 1 day Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 2 days White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 13 hours Why Natural Gas is Natural
  • 2 days Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 10 hours LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
Gulf of Mexico Production Falls 50%

Gulf of Mexico Production Falls 50%

The supply/demand balance in oil…

Judge Deals Exxon Blow In Climate Cover-Up Case

Oil barrels

A federal judge has put an end to Exxon’s attempt to sue the district attorneys of New York and Massachusetts for investigating the company with relation to its alleged cover-up of its knowledge of climate change and the effects its business had on the environment.

Manhattan judge Valerie Caproni dismissed as “implausible” Exxon’s argument that New York’s DA Eric Schneiderman and Massachusetts’ Maura Healey were on a political quest against the company, seeking to violate its constitutional rights.

The dismissal of the case was made with prejudice, meaning Exxon cannot bring it again, Reuters reports.

Exxon is being sued by employees and shareholders on allegations of knowing about the effects of the oil industry on climate change for decades but deliberately withholding the information from the public and from shareholders.

It is also being sued by several municipalities in California that argue its activities in the state have had a harmful impact on the environment. They are seeking billions in compensation from Exxon and a number of other oil supermajors.

Exxon struck back at those, too. In January, the company asked a California district court for permission to question a number of government officials and an attorney from Hagens Berman, arguing that these individuals have told the court one thing in their lawsuits against Exxon and a completely different thing to prospective bondholders about the effect of the energy industry on the local environment.

Related: Will Lithium-Air Batteries Ever Become Viable?

For example, Exxon says in its court filing against energy companies, San Mateo County has stated that it is very vulnerable to rising sea levels with a 93-percent risk of suffering a devastating flood before 2050. At the same time, however, two bond offerings, one from 2014 and one from 2016, say something very different, namely that San Mateo County “is unable to predict whether sea-level rise or other impacts of climate change or flooding from a major storm will occur.”

As regards its next steps in the New York and Massachusetts case, Exxon’s spokesman Scott Silvestri told Reuters the company was evaluating its options.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play