• 3 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 5 minutes Can LNG Kill Oil?
  • 8 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 11 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 5 hours “The era of cheap & abundant energy is long gone. Money supply & debt have grown faster than real economy. Debt saturation is now a real risk, requiring a global scale reset.”"We are now in new era of expensive unconventional energy
  • 3 hours CoV-19: China, WHO, myth vs fact
  • 17 hours Question - What if there are no buyers for Chevron's Appalachia Assets?
  • 7 hours Blowout videos
  • 1 day OIL trades as if the virus is a 1 quarter event. As if it's Containable, Reversible and Temporary. Is it ?
  • 47 mins Democrats Plan "B" Bloomberg Implodes. Plan "C" = John Kerry ?
  • 13 hours Natural Gas
  • 1 day Energy from thin air?
  • 2 days Hey NYC - Mayor De Blasio declares you must say goodbye to fossil fuels. Get ready to freeze your Virtue Signaling butts off.
  • 2 days Foxconn cancelled the reopening of their mfg plants scheduled for tomorrow. Rescheduled to March 3rd. . . . if they're lucky.
  • 16 hours Cheap natural gas is making it very hard to go green
  • 5 hours US Shale: Technology

Japanese Only Operational Nuclear Reactor Shut, Increasing Fuel Costs

Nuclear plant

A Japanese high court has ordered local utility Shikoku Electric Power Company to continue idling its only operational nuclear reactor until the company provides a satisfactory proof that the reactor is safe.

The extended shutdown of the nuclear reactor would lead to higher fuel costs for the Japanese utility.

Shikoku Electric Power’s only operational reactor at the Ikata nuclear plant in western Japan was taken offline at the end of December for regular maintenance. The utility planned to restart the reactor within two months, but the Hiroshima High Court has just ruled that the utility had not provided sufficient guarantees that the reactor would be safe in case of earthquakes or volcano eruptions.

Shikoku Electric Power will appeal the high court’s ruling, the company said on Friday, as carried by Reuters. Because of the extended nuclear reactor shutdown, the utility’s costs on fuel would increase by US$33 million (3.5 billion Japanese yen) per month, according to Keiichiro Inoue, general manager at Shikoku Electric Power’s branch office in Tokyo.

Japan is taking nuclear safety extremely seriously after the Fukushima disaster in March 2011 and public perception of how safe nuclear energy is has markedly shifted negative since then.

Resource poor Japan is the world’s biggest LNG importer and among the top four coal and oil importers. Before the Fukushima disaster, Japan used to generate 27 percent of its power from nuclear reactors.

Following the accident, Japan shut down all its 54 nuclear reactors to reassess their safety, and has restarted only a few of them so far.

Public opposition to nuclear energy is creating uncertainty about how much nuclear generation capacity Japan will restore.

Japan spent an additional annual average of around US$30 billion for fossil fuel imports in the three years after the Fukushima accident, according to EIA estimates.

The country is also looking at alternative energy sources, including hydrogen, in order to reduce its fossil fuels import bill as the future of many of its nuclear reactors is still uncertain.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • jone al sharon biriyani indian on January 20 2020 said:
    Nuclear reactor risky?

    everythig is risky. including sex with wife.

    my sisters neighbour about age 42 died while having sex with his wife of heart attack.

    so will eating or drinking or praying. so might as well die taking calcualted risk and not by political risks of ont doing anything but spreadig fear risks.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News