• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 45 mins Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 18 hours US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 47 mins EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 4 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 4 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 20 hours OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 4 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 16 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 6 hours 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 18 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 1 day Petrol versus EV
  • 21 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 23 hours 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
Will The U.S.-Saudi Spat Upend Oil Markets?

Will The U.S.-Saudi Spat Upend Oil Markets?

Saudi Arabia appeared to threaten…

Are Natural Gas Prices Set To Spike?

Are Natural Gas Prices Set To Spike?

Natural gas inventories have plunged…

Increase In Well Productivity Drives U.S. Production Jump

oil pipeline

New shale oil well productivity drove U.S. production higher in the last few years, with the average daily rate for the first month of operation rising from less than 100 barrels for most shale plays to between 200 and more than 600 barrels, the Energy Information Administration said in a new report.

Image courtesy: EIA

Last year, the energy authority said, shale oil production came to account for 54 percent of the United States’ overall oil production, in part thanks to this higher new-well productivity. The EIA said this higher productivity was the result of a combination of factors including the wider use of hydraulic fracturing and the drilling of more—and longer—horizontal wells, but most notably the increase in the amounts of frac sand used in new wells.

This combination of factors helped shale drillers to stay afloat and keep production going even during the downturn. In 2015 and 2016 there were fewer new wells drilled, but those that did get drilled were located in more productive areas and were drilled more quickly. Now that the worst is over, they are focusing on the Permian, the EIA noted, which holds more untapped reserves than the rest of the oil patch.

Related: Shell Wants Deepwater Breakevens Below $40

Average full-cycle breakeven costs in the Permian are US$42 per barrel, according to Rystad Energy. This accounts for the costs of the whole process—from drilling a well to starting production from it. If you add to its exploration costs for new locations, the cost comes in at US$48 per barrel—still significantly less than, say, offshore fields, and a lot below current oil prices.

What’s more, a shale oil well makes its money back in one year, compared to six to seven years for offshore projects. No wonder, then, that investors strongly prefer shale and the Permian in particular, and so do drillers.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Industry Person on May 04 2018 said:
    Irina, the break even quoted does not include royalties, taxes, pipeline fees, or any of the G&A overhead. Real break evens are a good deal higher, and very few of these wells are profitable at today's prices.

    These companies piling into the shale are making poor to negative returns on investment, so the real question here is how long will this go on for?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News