• 4 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 7 minutes IRAN / USA
  • 11 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 16 minutes Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 2 hours Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 4 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 6 hours Trump capitulated
  • 9 hours Three oil pipeline projects inch toward goal-line for Canada
  • 14 hours The Libyan Oil in a Sea of Chaos, War and Disruptions
  • 1 day Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 5 hours Gravity is a scam!
  • 7 hours Yet another Petroteq debt for equity deal
  • 4 hours US Shale: Technology
  • 21 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 17 hours OIL & GAS LOSSES! Schlumberger Posts $10B Loss in 2019
  • 1 day Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 1 hour Thanks to Trump, the Iranian Mullahs Are Going Bankrupt
  • 2 hours Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
OPEC Raises 2020 Global Oil Demand Growth Estimate

OPEC Raises 2020 Global Oil Demand Growth Estimate

Healthier global economic growth in…

The World's Most Expensive Oil Nears $100 Per Barrel

The World's Most Expensive Oil Nears $100 Per Barrel

Strong demand for heavy-sweet crude…

IEA: Decline In Nuclear Power Is Disastrous For Fight Against Climate Change

Grid

The retirement of old nuclear power plants in the coming years could compromise the international effort to arrest the rise in global temperatures and result in an increase in carbon emissions instead, the International Energy Agency has warned in a new report.

Nuclear is one of the lowest-emissions sources of energy but it has a bad reputation, which has prompted Germany, for example, to greatly reduce its operating nuclear capacity and replace it with renewables and, mostly, natural gas. France also had an idea to start phasing out the nuclear plants that supply more than two-thirds of its electricity but it seems common sense has temporarily prevailed. The start of the phase-out that should bring the share of nuclear in its energy mix from 75 percent to 50 percent was moved from 2025 to 2035.

Even so, the IEA says, “Without policy changes, advanced economies could lose 25% of their nuclear capacity by 2025 and as much as two-thirds of it by 2040.” This comes at a time when coal capacity is also being reduced fast because of emission concerns while wind and solar additions are stalling. If the share of nuclear drops as much as the IEA estimates based on the current situation, the planet could suffer as much as 4 billion tons of carbon dioxide in additional emissions.

Related: Renewables Investment To Overtake Oil & Gas In Asia

Interestingly enough, the authority believes that extending the life of existing nuclear power plants is a good way to prevent these additional emissions from materializing. Although cost-intensive, this extension is actually competitive with the addition of more solar and wind generation capacity. This would certainly come as a surprise to some energy industry insiders in the United States where the nuclear industry has been struggling to keep afloat in the face of cheap natural gas.

The alternative to life extension and construction of new nuclear power plants is, of course solar and wind. However, it won’t be as easy as some would like to believe.

As per the IEA, “If other low-carbon sources, namely wind and solar PV, are to fill the shortfall in nuclear, their deployment would have to accelerate to an unprecedented level. In the past 20 years, wind and solar PV capacity has increased by about 580 gigawatts in advanced economies. But over the next 20 years, nearly five times that amount would need to be added. Such a drastic increase in renewable power generation would create serious challenges in integrating the new sources into the broader energy system.”

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Ronald Wagner on May 28 2019 said:
    Natural gas has succeeded in making America the foremost reducer of carbon emissions of all large nations. It is much more desirable than nuclear plants that cost far more and take a decade to complete.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News