• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 53 mins DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 4 hours Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 5 hours Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 9 hours POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 8 hours americavchina.com
  • 9 hours Forget The Hype, Aramco Shares May be Valued At Zero Next Year
  • 1 day Democrats through impeachment process helped Trump go out of China deal conundrum. Now Trump can safely postpone deal till after November 2020 elections
  • 45 mins Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 9 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 19 hours Can Renewable Natural Gas Compete With Diesel?

Hydropower Has Higher Environmental Cost Than Believed: Study

Hoover dam

Dam construction involves higher environmental and social costs than previously estimated, a new study has suggested.

The study, cited by Phys.org, was carried out by researchers from Michigan State University and found that "When a large dam is built, the result is a downstream loss of a great many fish species that are important to riverine populations. These communities will have to continue somehow making a living despite dwindling fish stocks for 15 or 20 years, for example, and the costs of these projects don't take such economic and social losses into account," as explained by the lead author of the study, Emilio Moran.

A lot of developed countries have stopped building large-scale dams and have switched to smaller hydropower installations but developing countries such as Brazil are still investing in large dam construction.

"We argue that if the construction of large dams in developing countries is to continue, it must always be preceded by a painstaking assessment of their real cost, including the environmental and social impact they have," Moran noted. The lead author of the study is visiting professor at the University of Campinas in Sau Paulo state in Brazil.

 The environmental costs of large-scale hydropower installations are not new but they don’t seem to get as much attention as other forms of power generation. The Union of Concerned Scientists, for example, cites an article on the environmental and social impacts of the world’s biggest dam, the Three Gorges, in China.

Its construction involved the flooding of a huge region, destroying ecosystems, affecting wildlife habitats and necessitating the relocation of entire communities. The total number of people displaced because of the project was 1.13 million.

What’s more, dams don’t last forever. They need to be retired and dismantled and this bears a high financial cost, too. "The cost of removing a dam once its useful life is over is extremely high, and should be taken into account when computing the total cost of a new hydro development," Moran notes. "If the cost of removal had to be included, many dams wouldn't be built. It would be far more expensive to produce a kilowatt-hour of electricity via a hydro complex with a useful life of 30 to 50 years, like those under construction in Brazil."

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Mitch on January 13 2019 said:
    Why do they only have a 30-50 year life span?? Hoover dam is almost 100 years old... oil and gas, mining and other companies need to carry decommissioning/asset retirement obligations on the books

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play