• 4 minutes Nord Stream 2 Halt Possible Over Navalny Poisoning
  • 8 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 11 minutes JP Morgan says investors should prepare for rising odds of Trump win
  • 2 days Daniel Yergin Book is a Reality Check on Energy
  • 5 hours US after 4 more years of Trump?
  • 3 days Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 2 days Famine, Economic Collapse of China on the Horizon?
  • 2 days Oil giants partner with environmental group to track Permian Basin's methane emissions
  • 3 days Gepthermal fracking: how to confuse a greenie
  • 3 days YPF to redeploy rigs in Vaca Muerta on export potential
  • 15 mins Something wicked this way comes
  • 16 mins Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 3 days Top HHS official takes leave of absence after Facebook rant about CDC conspiracies
  • 11 hours The Perfect Solution To Remove Conflict Problems In The South China East Asia Sea
  • 2 days Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 4 days Surviving without coal is a challenge!!

Hydropower Has Higher Environmental Cost Than Believed: Study

Dam construction involves higher environmental and social costs than previously estimated, a new study has suggested.

The study, cited by Phys.org, was carried out by researchers from Michigan State University and found that "When a large dam is built, the result is a downstream loss of a great many fish species that are important to riverine populations. These communities will have to continue somehow making a living despite dwindling fish stocks for 15 or 20 years, for example, and the costs of these projects don't take such economic and social losses into account," as explained by the lead author of the study, Emilio Moran.

A lot of developed countries have stopped building large-scale dams and have switched to smaller hydropower installations but developing countries such as Brazil are still investing in large dam construction.

"We argue that if the construction of large dams in developing countries is to continue, it must always be preceded by a painstaking assessment of their real cost, including the environmental and social impact they have," Moran noted. The lead author of the study is visiting professor at the University of Campinas in Sau Paulo state in Brazil.

 The environmental costs of large-scale hydropower installations are not new but they don’t seem to get as much attention as other forms of power generation. The Union of Concerned Scientists, for example, cites an article on the environmental and social impacts of the world’s biggest dam, the Three Gorges, in China.

Its construction involved the flooding of a huge region, destroying ecosystems, affecting wildlife habitats and necessitating the relocation of entire communities. The total number of people displaced because of the project was 1.13 million.

What’s more, dams don’t last forever. They need to be retired and dismantled and this bears a high financial cost, too. "The cost of removing a dam once its useful life is over is extremely high, and should be taken into account when computing the total cost of a new hydro development," Moran notes. "If the cost of removal had to be included, many dams wouldn't be built. It would be far more expensive to produce a kilowatt-hour of electricity via a hydro complex with a useful life of 30 to 50 years, like those under construction in Brazil."

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Mitch on January 13 2019 said:
    Why do they only have a 30-50 year life span?? Hoover dam is almost 100 years old... oil and gas, mining and other companies need to carry decommissioning/asset retirement obligations on the books

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News