• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 15 hours Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 10 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 17 mins Iran Loses $130,000,000 Oil Revenue Every Day They Continue Their Childish Games . . . .Opportunity Lost . . . Will Never Get It Back. . . . . LOL .
  • 6 hours Iran Captures British Tanker sailing through Straits of Hormuz
  • 19 hours Drone For Drone = War: What is next in the U.S. - Iran the Gulf Episode
  • 7 hours Renewables provided only about 4% of total global energy needs in 2018
  • 23 hours Today in Energy
  • 2 days Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 54 mins Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 2 days Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 1 day LA Solar Power/Storage Contract
  • 2 days Why Natural Gas is Natural
  • 10 hours U.S. Administration Moves To End Asylum Protections For Central Americans
UAE Looks To Launch New Regional Oil Benchmark

UAE Looks To Launch New Regional Oil Benchmark

The Abu Dhabi National Oil…

Bullish Sentiment Fades From Oil Markets

Bullish Sentiment Fades From Oil Markets

With the threat to oil…

Obama Administration Allows Uranium Mine Near Grand Canyon to Re-Open

The Obama Administration has given the go ahead for Energy Fuels Resources to reopen a mine located six miles south of the popular South Rim entrance, despite claims by environmental groups and local tribes that the Administration’s withdrawal of lands from mineral entry prevents any new mines from going forward.

The Canadian company and Administration have said that the withdrawal doesn’t apply to mines with valid, pre-existing rights.  Indeed, the Administration has said that up to 11 uranium mines could proceed under Obama’s withdrawal.  Development began on the Canyon mine over 20 years ago, but ceased due to depressed uranium prices. The original rights to mine were granted after the US Forest Service conducted an environmental study over 25 years ago, in 1986.  The Forest Service recently reaffirmed this previous approval, and Energy Fuels has proceeded with development based on this approval.

Several environmental groups, including Grand Canyon Trust, the Sierra Club, and the Centre for Biological Diversity, have now filed a lawsuit against the Forest Service, claiming that the study is badly outdated and should no longer apply.
Curtis H Moore, a spokesman for Energy Fuels Resources, says that “the Forest Service looked at that review with modern eyes and determined that it's adequate”

Related article: Benefit from the Coming Equity Uptick in Uranium, Potash, and Coal

The problem that the lawsuit is highlighting is that, once the uranium is extracted from the ground and exposed to water and the air it can become mobilized in groundwater.  In addition, uranium mines produce radon gas, a toxic substance that was not regulated back in 1986.  However, the EPA regulates radon under a separate permit that Energy Fuels will be required to obtain.

After the second world war uranium mines were common in the south-west, but since then nearly all of the mines have closed down as uranium demand and price dropped. The uranium market has recovered somewhat, and some companies are looking to reopen old mines. The outcome of the case against the Forest Service will determine whether or not these mines are able to open using previously issued permits; the result could affect up to 11 uranium mines inside the 2011 withdrawal area.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play