• 40 mins Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 3 hours Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 9 hours Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 14 hours Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 18 hours Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 20 hours Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 24 hours Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 1 day Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 1 day Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 1 day U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 2 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 2 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 2 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 2 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 2 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 2 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 2 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 3 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 3 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 3 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 3 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 3 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 3 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 3 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 4 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 4 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 4 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 4 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 4 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 4 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
  • 4 days Iran Denies Involvement In Bahrain Oil Pipeline Blast
  • 7 days The Oil Rig Drilling 10 Miles Under The Sea
  • 7 days Baghdad Agrees To Ship Kirkuk Oil To Iran
  • 7 days Another Group Joins Niger Delta Avengers’ Ceasefire Boycott
  • 7 days Italy Looks To Phase Out Coal-Fired Electricity By 2025
  • 7 days Kenya Set To Give Local Communities Greater Share Of Oil Revenues
  • 7 days Rosneft, China To Deepen Strategic Cooperation
  • 7 days New York Listing Unlikely For Aramco IPO
  • 7 days China To Invest $83B In U.S. Shale
  • 8 days Aramco To Spend $100 Billion In Capital Expenditures Next Year
Is Peak Permian Only 3 Years Away?

Is Peak Permian Only 3 Years Away?

Texas’ Permian Basin is the…

China Resumes Oil Hoarding Despite Higher Prices

China Resumes Oil Hoarding Despite Higher Prices

Satellite imaging data suggests that…

Obama Administration Allows Uranium Mine Near Grand Canyon to Re-Open

Obama Administration Allows Uranium Mine Near Grand Canyon to Re-Open

The Obama Administration has given the go ahead for Energy Fuels Resources to reopen a mine located six miles south of the popular South Rim entrance, despite claims by environmental groups and local tribes that the Administration’s withdrawal of lands from mineral entry prevents any new mines from going forward.

The Canadian company and Administration have said that the withdrawal doesn’t apply to mines with valid, pre-existing rights.  Indeed, the Administration has said that up to 11 uranium mines could proceed under Obama’s withdrawal.  Development began on the Canyon mine over 20 years ago, but ceased due to depressed uranium prices. The original rights to mine were granted after the US Forest Service conducted an environmental study over 25 years ago, in 1986.  The Forest Service recently reaffirmed this previous approval, and Energy Fuels has proceeded with development based on this approval.

Several environmental groups, including Grand Canyon Trust, the Sierra Club, and the Centre for Biological Diversity, have now filed a lawsuit against the Forest Service, claiming that the study is badly outdated and should no longer apply.
Curtis H Moore, a spokesman for Energy Fuels Resources, says that “the Forest Service looked at that review with modern eyes and determined that it's adequate”

Related article: Benefit from the Coming Equity Uptick in Uranium, Potash, and Coal

The problem that the lawsuit is highlighting is that, once the uranium is extracted from the ground and exposed to water and the air it can become mobilized in groundwater.  In addition, uranium mines produce radon gas, a toxic substance that was not regulated back in 1986.  However, the EPA regulates radon under a separate permit that Energy Fuels will be required to obtain.

After the second world war uranium mines were common in the south-west, but since then nearly all of the mines have closed down as uranium demand and price dropped. The uranium market has recovered somewhat, and some companies are looking to reopen old mines. The outcome of the case against the Forest Service will determine whether or not these mines are able to open using previously issued permits; the result could affect up to 11 uranium mines inside the 2011 withdrawal area.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News