• 3 minutes War for Taiwan?
  • 7 minutes How China Is Racing To Expand Its Global Energy Influence
  • 10 minutes Is it time to talk about Hydrogen?
  • 35 mins U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 4 hours Mail IN Ballot Fraud
  • 19 hours Supreme Court rules against Cuomo's coronavirus limits
  • 15 hours “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 3 hours Biden's Green New Deal- Short Term - How Will He Start to Transition Out Of Crude?
  • 5 hours America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 10 hours Saudi Arabia Seeks to Become Top Hydrogen Exporter
  • 3 days Censorship in USA
  • 2 mins WTI / ​​​​​​​Price Forecasting 
  • 2 days “Consumers Will Pay For Carbon Pricing Costs” by Irina Slav

Breaking News:

Volkswagen Readies Compact EV For 2023

Obama Administration Allows Uranium Mine Near Grand Canyon to Re-Open

The Obama Administration has given the go ahead for Energy Fuels Resources to reopen a mine located six miles south of the popular South Rim entrance, despite claims by environmental groups and local tribes that the Administration’s withdrawal of lands from mineral entry prevents any new mines from going forward.

The Canadian company and Administration have said that the withdrawal doesn’t apply to mines with valid, pre-existing rights.  Indeed, the Administration has said that up to 11 uranium mines could proceed under Obama’s withdrawal.  Development began on the Canyon mine over 20 years ago, but ceased due to depressed uranium prices. The original rights to mine were granted after the US Forest Service conducted an environmental study over 25 years ago, in 1986.  The Forest Service recently reaffirmed this previous approval, and Energy Fuels has proceeded with development based on this approval.

Several environmental groups, including Grand Canyon Trust, the Sierra Club, and the Centre for Biological Diversity, have now filed a lawsuit against the Forest Service, claiming that the study is badly outdated and should no longer apply.
Curtis H Moore, a spokesman for Energy Fuels Resources, says that “the Forest Service looked at that review with modern eyes and determined that it's adequate”

Related article: Benefit from the Coming Equity Uptick in Uranium, Potash, and Coal

The problem that the lawsuit is highlighting is that, once the uranium is extracted from the ground and exposed to water and the air it can become mobilized in groundwater.  In addition, uranium mines produce radon gas, a toxic substance that was not regulated back in 1986.  However, the EPA regulates radon under a separate permit that Energy Fuels will be required to obtain.

After the second world war uranium mines were common in the south-west, but since then nearly all of the mines have closed down as uranium demand and price dropped. The uranium market has recovered somewhat, and some companies are looking to reopen old mines. The outcome of the case against the Forest Service will determine whether or not these mines are able to open using previously issued permits; the result could affect up to 11 uranium mines inside the 2011 withdrawal area.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News