• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 7 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 11 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 14 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 11 hours Trump bogged down in Mideast quagmire. US spent $Trillions, lost Thousands of lives, and lost goodwill. FOR WHAT? US interests ? WHAT INTEREST ? . . . . China greatest threat next 50 years.
  • 3 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 2 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
  • 14 hours Struggle For Supremacy: Kremlin Condemns Alleged U.S. Ultimatum To Turkey Over Missile Deal
  • 8 hours Apple Bid To Buy Tesla in 2013 For $240 a Share
  • 12 hours Another surprise 'build'
  • 19 hours Solar Cheaper than Coal
  • 12 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 10 hours California's Oil Industry Collapses Despite Shale Boom
  • 11 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 11 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 12 hours Global Warming Making The Rich Richer
  • 1 day Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS

Obama Administration Allows Uranium Mine Near Grand Canyon to Re-Open

The Obama Administration has given the go ahead for Energy Fuels Resources to reopen a mine located six miles south of the popular South Rim entrance, despite claims by environmental groups and local tribes that the Administration’s withdrawal of lands from mineral entry prevents any new mines from going forward.

The Canadian company and Administration have said that the withdrawal doesn’t apply to mines with valid, pre-existing rights.  Indeed, the Administration has said that up to 11 uranium mines could proceed under Obama’s withdrawal.  Development began on the Canyon mine over 20 years ago, but ceased due to depressed uranium prices. The original rights to mine were granted after the US Forest Service conducted an environmental study over 25 years ago, in 1986.  The Forest Service recently reaffirmed this previous approval, and Energy Fuels has proceeded with development based on this approval.

Several environmental groups, including Grand Canyon Trust, the Sierra Club, and the Centre for Biological Diversity, have now filed a lawsuit against the Forest Service, claiming that the study is badly outdated and should no longer apply.
Curtis H Moore, a spokesman for Energy Fuels Resources, says that “the Forest Service looked at that review with modern eyes and determined that it's adequate”

Related article: Benefit from the Coming Equity Uptick in Uranium, Potash, and Coal

The problem that the lawsuit is highlighting is that, once the uranium is extracted from the ground and exposed to water and the air it can become mobilized in groundwater.  In addition, uranium mines produce radon gas, a toxic substance that was not regulated back in 1986.  However, the EPA regulates radon under a separate permit that Energy Fuels will be required to obtain.

After the second world war uranium mines were common in the south-west, but since then nearly all of the mines have closed down as uranium demand and price dropped. The uranium market has recovered somewhat, and some companies are looking to reopen old mines. The outcome of the case against the Forest Service will determine whether or not these mines are able to open using previously issued permits; the result could affect up to 11 uranium mines inside the 2011 withdrawal area.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News