• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 1 day Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 1 day Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 1 day Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 1 day Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
The Safest Way To Bet On The Bitcoin Boom

The Safest Way To Bet On The Bitcoin Boom

Often described as the backbone…

For the Cost of the HS2 High-Speed Train, UK could Develop Nuclear Fusion

For the Cost of the HS2 High-Speed Train, UK could Develop Nuclear Fusion

Following a recent spending review the British government has announced that the HS2 high speed train line being built between London and Birmingham will cost more than previously anticipated. The new estimates place the cost of the project, which will be finished around 2033, at £42.6 billion for construction, and then £7.5 billion for the trains, coming in at a little more than £50 billion in total.

That happens to be around the same amount that it has been predicted would be needed to develop nuclear fusion energy.

Construction continues on the HS2
Construction continues on the HS2. (HS2.org.uk)

Now knowing that, the government should find itself in a dilemma. Reduce the commute between London and Birmingham by 35 minutes, or develop a virtually limitless, source of cheap, clean energy that could significantly reduce the world’s carbon emissions.

Related Article: Funding Disappears for Nuclear Fusion Following Poor Progress

Not much of a dilemma when it’s put like that!

Now the HS2 will bring economic benefits to the UK, but these are incredibly difficult to quantify as it is still unknown exactly how the line will fit into the rest of the country’s transport system; nuclear fusion however, will definitely provide huge economic, environmental, and social benefits.

Now some of you may wonder if fusion is actually achievable for £50 billion, and the truth is that no one knows. It may take many decades and hundreds of billions of pounds to perfect the technology, or if breakthroughs are made far faster than anticipated it could happen in a decade or so and only tens of billions of pounds.

At the same time, estimates for the HS2 could be as inaccurate as those for fusion, mega-infrastructure projects tend to run over budget and over schedule all the time. The only main difference being is that nuclear fusion could cost less and be ready quicker, and the HS2 never will.

Related Article: Scientists Close to Building Nuclear Fusion Powered Rocket

JET reactor in Oxfordshire.
JET reactor in Oxfordshire. (EFDA)

The JET reactor in Oxfordshire has already managed to create a fusion reaction, the only thing that scientists must work on now is creating a continuous reaction that can produce affordable energy. Most hopes lie in giant fusion projects such as the ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) in Europe, however it is generally agreed that breakthroughs are more likely to be achieved in smaller scale projects on a far shorter time frame.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News