• 3 minutes Nucelar Deal Is Dead? Iran Distances Itself Further From ND, Alarming Russia And France
  • 5 minutes Don Jr. Tweets name Ukraine Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Worked for CIA during Obama Administration, Hold over to Trump National Security Counsel under Gen McCallister, more . . . .
  • 9 minutes Shale pioneer Chesepeak will file bankruptcy soon. FINALLY ! The consolidation begins
  • 12 minutes China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 1 min EU has already lost the Trump vs. EU Trade War
  • 11 hours Impeachment S**te
  • 4 hours More dumbed down? re Hong Kong Act of Congress
  • 18 hours 55.00 WTI
  • 58 mins Article: Did Exxon only make $39 Million onshore U.S. last quarter ?
  • 2 hours Visualizing Pennsylvania Oil & Gas Production (Through September 2019)
  • 2 days IEA predicts oil demand will grow annually at 1 million barrels a day for the next 5 years
  • 2 days Crazy Stories From Round The World
  • 4 hours U.S. Shale To Break Records Despite Bearish Rhetoric
  • 1 day Everything You Need To Know About Trump
  • 3 hours Pope Proposes New Sin: Thou Shalt Not Destroy The Harmony Of The Environment
  • 20 hours Water, Trump, and Israel’s National Security
  • 3 days Science: Only correct if it fits the popular narrative
  • 2 days ‘If it saves a life’: Power cut to 1.5 million Californians
  • 1 day Last I Checked

Exxon Could Be Stripped Of European Parliament Lobby Access

ExxonMobil

Exxon could lose its lobbying access to the European parliament after no company representative showed up at a hearing on climate change denial, the Guardian reports.

A member of the European parliament from the Green party has already submitted a request to ban the company.

“This is the company that denied the science, despite knowing the damage their oil exploitation was causing; which funded campaigns to block action on climate and now refuses to face up to its environmental crimes by attending today’s hearing. We cannot allow the lobbyists from such corporations free access to the corridors of the European parliament. We must remove their badges immediately,” Molly Scott Cato wrote in her request.

The company, however, said it was prevented from attending the hearing because of “ongoing climate change-related litigation in the US”. In a statement sent to the British daily, Exxon elaborated: “We reject the false allegation that ExxonMobil suppressed scientific research on climate change. News reports that claim we reached definitive conclusions about the science of climate change decades before the world’s experts are simply not accurate and have long since been debunked.”

Exxon has been targeted by environmentalists and other anti-oil groups at home, and just recently two municipalities in California—San Francisco and Oakland—renewed their fight to return their lawsuit against the supermajor and four other Big Oil companies to court.

San Francisco and Oakland are suing Chevron, Exxon, Shell, BP, and ConocoPhillips for selling oil products despite their knowledge of the effect these products had on the environment. Last week, they approached a federal appeals court with a request to reinstate their lawsuits against the Big Oil companies, which a U.S. District Judge dismissed last year.

In Europe, Exxon has spent more than US$35 million on lobbying at the European Parliament since 2010, according to figures from the Corporate Europe Observatory cited by the Guardian.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Dan Pearson on March 22 2019 said:
    As per an investment article by "dividendsensei.com" 3/21/2019, Seeking Alpha, "In 2017 most of the Paris signatories, including the self-righteous and supposedly green EU, saw CO2 emissions increase. The US led the way in actually reducing CO2 emissions".

    The European Union is total hypocracy when it comes to environmental issues, specifically, abiding by the Paris Climate Agreement. Before the EU confronts any country or company, the EU need to look at their own performance as it relates to the environment, GHG's, and Global Warming. As per the article: "In 2017 US per capita CO2 emissions hit a 67 year low, thanks to the rise of shale gas, which misguided environmentalists and politicians are working ferociously to stop."

    Data from a graph of 2017 CO2 emissions show that the U.S. actually reduced CO2 emissions by 42 million tons, while the EU during 2017 increased their CO2 emissions by 42 million tons.

    Refer to the Graph of CO2 emissions from the cited article: https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2019/2/22/47572571-15508541192005684_origin.png
  • Tripp Mills on March 22 2019 said:
    BY WHO? ll give money to Exxon right now and help them get this undone! (next week isn't that far away meaning not right now however next week). CUT OPEC CUT OPEC - don't let our industry get bankrupted by anyone! Shareholders also have a say - we call the shots, we own... and they can LOBBY their A's off!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play