• 4 minutes Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 7 minutes China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 8 minutes Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 10 minutes US Shale: Technology
  • 13 minutes Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
  • 17 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 2 hours Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 18 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 3 hours Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 11 hours Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 4 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 1 day What's the Endgame Here?
  • 15 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 18 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 1 day Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 17 hours Wind Turbine Blades Not Recyclable
  • 13 hours Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
This Emerging Oil Hotspot Threatens The OPEC Deal

This Emerging Oil Hotspot Threatens The OPEC Deal

Guyana has exported its first…

Why BlackRock Is ‘Going Green’

Why BlackRock Is ‘Going Green’

Investor pressure on fossil fuel…

Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved

Pipeline

Enbridge will be able to double the capacity of its Line 67 crude oil pipeline from Edmonton, in Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, after the U.S. State Department granted it a permit for the facility after a lengthy review process.

After the expansion, the pipe will be able to carry up to 890,000 bpd, from the current 450,000 bpd.

The permit, Reuters notes, follows a five-year review of the project amid growing public opposition in both the United States and Canada to new crude oil pipelines. As every cross-border pipeline projects requires a presidential permit, Enbridge had to wait for the Obama administration to complete the review, but lost patience in 2014 and instead decided to go around the delay and link Line 67, also known as the Alberta Clipper, to its Line 3 pipeline.

Line 3 is also the object of controversy, after Enbridge proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the U.S., Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion.

The project, however, recently ran into a large obstacle as the Minnesota Commerce Department in September surprisingly said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

Related: Iraq Seizes Kirkuk, Briefly Knocks 350,000 Bpd Offline

Luckily for Enbridge, it’s not the Commerce Department that grants permits for a new pipeline, but the agency that does, the state Public Utilities Commission, could be swayed by the Commerce Department’s argument.

Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. Now, the expansion of Line 67 will relieve other parts of the Mainline system that have been overloaded due to the combination of growing oil production and no change in the pipeline network.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Dave Samson on October 24 2017 said:
    EXCELLENT,,,thank you Mr. President...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play