• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 3 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 35 mins The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 14 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 7 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 6 mins Trump vs. MbS
  • 6 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 14 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 11 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 8 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 2 hours Coal remains a major source of power in Europe.
  • 46 mins EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 10 hours Nopec Sherman act legislation
  • 3 hours Poland signs 20-year deal on U.S. LNG supplies
Is Uranium On The Way Back?

Is Uranium On The Way Back?

Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium miner has…

Are U.S. Oil Exports Really Unstoppable?

Are U.S. Oil Exports Really Unstoppable?

U.S. crude oil exports hit…

Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved

Pipeline

Enbridge will be able to double the capacity of its Line 67 crude oil pipeline from Edmonton, in Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, after the U.S. State Department granted it a permit for the facility after a lengthy review process.

After the expansion, the pipe will be able to carry up to 890,000 bpd, from the current 450,000 bpd.

The permit, Reuters notes, follows a five-year review of the project amid growing public opposition in both the United States and Canada to new crude oil pipelines. As every cross-border pipeline projects requires a presidential permit, Enbridge had to wait for the Obama administration to complete the review, but lost patience in 2014 and instead decided to go around the delay and link Line 67, also known as the Alberta Clipper, to its Line 3 pipeline.

Line 3 is also the object of controversy, after Enbridge proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the U.S., Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion.

The project, however, recently ran into a large obstacle as the Minnesota Commerce Department in September surprisingly said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

Related: Iraq Seizes Kirkuk, Briefly Knocks 350,000 Bpd Offline

Luckily for Enbridge, it’s not the Commerce Department that grants permits for a new pipeline, but the agency that does, the state Public Utilities Commission, could be swayed by the Commerce Department’s argument.

Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. Now, the expansion of Line 67 will relieve other parts of the Mainline system that have been overloaded due to the combination of growing oil production and no change in the pipeline network.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Dave Samson on October 24 2017 said:
    EXCELLENT,,,thank you Mr. President...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News