• 4 minutes End of Sanction Waivers
  • 8 minutes Balancing Act---Sanctions, Venezuela, Trade War and Demand
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 14 minutes What Would Happen If the World Ran Out of Crude Oil?
  • 2 hours New German Study Shocks Electric Cars: “Considerably” Worse For Climate Than Diesel Cars, Up To 25% More CO2
  • 36 mins Permafrost Melting Will Cost Us $70 Trillion
  • 17 mins Russia To Start Deliveries Of S-400 To Turkey In July
  • 23 mins Nothing Better than Li-Ion on the Horizon
  • 2 hours UNCONFIRMED : US airstrikes target 32 oil tankers near Syria’s Deir al-Zor
  • 9 hours Countries with the most oil and where they're selling it
  • 47 mins Occidental Offers To Buy Anadarko In $57 Billion Deal, Topping Chevron
  • 10 hours Section 232 Uranium
  • 14 hours China To Promote Using Wind Energy To Power Heating
  • 3 hours ..
  • 1 hour How many drilling sites are left in the Permian?
  • 3 hours Iran Sabre Rattles Over the Straights of Hormuz
Global Intelligence Report - 17th April 2019

Global Intelligence Report - 17th April 2019

As Libya continues to capture…

Is It Time To Invest In Offshore?

Is It Time To Invest In Offshore?

The deepwater and offshore sectors…

Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved

Pipeline

Enbridge will be able to double the capacity of its Line 67 crude oil pipeline from Edmonton, in Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, after the U.S. State Department granted it a permit for the facility after a lengthy review process.

After the expansion, the pipe will be able to carry up to 890,000 bpd, from the current 450,000 bpd.

The permit, Reuters notes, follows a five-year review of the project amid growing public opposition in both the United States and Canada to new crude oil pipelines. As every cross-border pipeline projects requires a presidential permit, Enbridge had to wait for the Obama administration to complete the review, but lost patience in 2014 and instead decided to go around the delay and link Line 67, also known as the Alberta Clipper, to its Line 3 pipeline.

Line 3 is also the object of controversy, after Enbridge proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the U.S., Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion.

The project, however, recently ran into a large obstacle as the Minnesota Commerce Department in September surprisingly said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

Related: Iraq Seizes Kirkuk, Briefly Knocks 350,000 Bpd Offline

Luckily for Enbridge, it’s not the Commerce Department that grants permits for a new pipeline, but the agency that does, the state Public Utilities Commission, could be swayed by the Commerce Department’s argument.

Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. Now, the expansion of Line 67 will relieve other parts of the Mainline system that have been overloaded due to the combination of growing oil production and no change in the pipeline network.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Dave Samson on October 24 2017 said:
    EXCELLENT,,,thank you Mr. President...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News