• 1 day Statoil Changes Name
  • 2 days Nuclear Bomb = Nuclear War: Saudi Arabia Will Develop Nuclear Bomb If Iran Does
  • 2 days Tillerson just sacked ... how will market react?
  • 2 days Petrobras Narrows 2017 Loss, Net Debt Falls Below $85bn
  • 19 hours Russian hackers targeted American energy grid
  • 16 hours Is $71 As Good As It Gets For Oil Bulls This Year?
  • 2 days Proton battery-alternative for lithium?
  • 2 days Ford Recalls 1.38 Million Vehicles (North America) For Loose Steering Wheel Bolt
  • 16 hours Oil Boom Will Help Ghana To Be One Of The Fastest Growing¨Economies By 2018!
  • 19 hours Country With Biggest Oil Reserves Biggest Threat to World Economy
  • 2 days I vote for Exxon
  • 2 days South Korea Would Suspend Five Coal - Fire Power Plants.
  • 17 hours HAPPY RIG COUNT DAY!!
  • 2 days Why is gold soooo boring?
  • 2 days UK vs. Russia - Britain Expels 23 Russian Diplomats Over Chemical Attack On Ex-Spy.
  • 16 hours Spotify to file $1 billion IPO
Why Are Oilfield Decline Rates Falling?

Why Are Oilfield Decline Rates Falling?

Despite the spending cuts that…

Gas Exporters Want Oil-Linked Prices

Gas Exporters Want Oil-Linked Prices

Natural gas exporters want to…

Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved


Enbridge will be able to double the capacity of its Line 67 crude oil pipeline from Edmonton, in Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, after the U.S. State Department granted it a permit for the facility after a lengthy review process.

After the expansion, the pipe will be able to carry up to 890,000 bpd, from the current 450,000 bpd.

The permit, Reuters notes, follows a five-year review of the project amid growing public opposition in both the United States and Canada to new crude oil pipelines. As every cross-border pipeline projects requires a presidential permit, Enbridge had to wait for the Obama administration to complete the review, but lost patience in 2014 and instead decided to go around the delay and link Line 67, also known as the Alberta Clipper, to its Line 3 pipeline.

Line 3 is also the object of controversy, after Enbridge proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the U.S., Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion.

The project, however, recently ran into a large obstacle as the Minnesota Commerce Department in September surprisingly said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

Related: Iraq Seizes Kirkuk, Briefly Knocks 350,000 Bpd Offline

Luckily for Enbridge, it’s not the Commerce Department that grants permits for a new pipeline, but the agency that does, the state Public Utilities Commission, could be swayed by the Commerce Department’s argument.

Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. Now, the expansion of Line 67 will relieve other parts of the Mainline system that have been overloaded due to the combination of growing oil production and no change in the pipeline network.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Dave Samson on October 24 2017 said:
    EXCELLENT,,,thank you Mr. President...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News