X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

  • 4 minutes IMPORTANT ARTICLE BY OILPRICE.COM EDITOR - "Naked Short Selling: The Truth Is Much Worse Than You Have Been Told"
  • 5 minutes “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 7 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 17 mins Texas forced to have rolling black outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 14 hours Retired RAF pilot wins legal challenge over a wind farm
  • 12 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 4 hours Speaker Pelosi, "Tear Down This Wall"
  • 10 hours NYT:  The Supreme Court’s order (Re:  Trump’s tax returns) set in motion a series of events that could lead to the startling possibility of a criminal trial of a former U.S. president
  • 3 hours Interest article about windmills and waterwheels in Europe
  • 2 hours Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 5 hours Disaster looming in UK offshore wind power
  • 14 hours Wednesday Nikki Haley reached out to Trump for meeting at Mar-a-lago. Trump said No ! You blew it Nikki . . .
  • 2 days Minerals, Mining and Industrial Ecology
  • 13 hours Scientist clone endangered Black Footed Ferret from Ferret that died 30 years ago . It's a 100% exact genomic match.
  • 21 hours Pipeline vs Train vs Ship to Transport Crude Oil.
  • 23 hours NG spot prices hit triple digits for weekend delivery
  • 2 days Chance for (Saudi)Arabian peninsula having giant onshore Gas too?

Duke Energy Customers Could Pay $5 Billion For Stranded Plants

Customers of Duke Energy in the Carolinas could end up paying more than $4.8 billion for planned natural gas-fired capacity that could become stranded as part of the company’s pledge to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, a report published by the Energy Transition Institute has found.

The report, authored by Tyler Fitch, regulatory manager for the Southeast at advocacy organization Vote Solar, examined Duke Energy’s 2020 Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs) in North and South Carolina. These were the first plans the utility has filed with regulators since it pledged in September 2019 to reach net-zero carbon emissions from electric generation by the middle of the century.

The IRPs entail the addition of 9.6 gigawatts (GW) of new gas-fired generation capacity in their baseline scenarios, which, the report’s author Fitch says, is one of the largest proposed expansions of fossil fuel generation capacity of any utility in the United States.

However, in order to meet its net-zero goal, Duke Energy may have to remove a substantial portion of its power plant fleet by 2050, shortening the lifetime of what would be newly-built gas-fired power plants, according to the report.

“Without regulatory intervention, ratepayers will continue to pay off these plants for decades, even while they remain neither used nor useful,” Fitch wrote in the report.

Related: Why Gazprom Cut Gas Supply To Europe Amid Rising Prices

According to the author’s analysis, the so-called carbon stranding costs from existing and proposed investments in the IRPs will be $4.8 billion. This means $900 for every residential customer of Duke Energy in North and South Carolina.

“While our IRPs involved significant stakeholder participation and stand up to intense scrutiny through a transparent regulatory review, there’s virtually no way to validate the assumptions and conclusions in this report,” Erin Culbert, a spokeswoman for Duke Energy, told John Downey of the Charlotte Business Journal, commenting on the report.

“The scenario of building no new natural gas sounds simple, but it’s the most expensive option for our customers and actually requires coal units to operate longer,” Culbert told the CBJ.  

By Michael Kern for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

 



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News