• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 8 days Does Toyota Know Something That We Don’t?
  • 1 day America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 7 days World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 9 days China is using Chinese Names of Cities on their Border with Russia.
  • 10 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 11 days OPINION: Putin’s Genocidal Myth A scholarly treatise on the thousands of years of Ukrainian history. RCW
  • 11 days CHINA Economy IMPLODING - Fastest Price Fall in 14 Years & Stock Market Crashes to 5 Year Low
  • 9 days CHINA Economy Disaster - Employee Shortages, Retirement Age, Birth Rate & Ageing Population
  • 1 day How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 10 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
  • 10 days "(Another) Putin Critic 'Falls' Out Of Window, Dies"
How Next-Gen Biomanufacturing Can Help Slash Global Emissions

How Next-Gen Biomanufacturing Can Help Slash Global Emissions

Osaka University researchers have developed…

Climate Groups Defeat Norwegian Government In Court Battle

The Norwegian government has suffered a major setback in its bid to expand the country’s oil and gas production after the country’s Supreme Court ruled that three permits issued by the government to develop new offshore oil and gas fields are invalid because their environmental impact was not sufficiently assessed. 

Last year, Greenpeace Nordic and Natur og Ungdom filed a lawsuit with the Oslo District Court, seeking a temporary injunction for the three projects—Equinor ASA’s (NYSE:EQNR) Breidablikk and Aker BP’s (OTCQX:AKRBF) Yggdrasil and Tyrving in the North Sea–citing a failure by the companies and the Norwegian government to consider the full impact of the future use of all the extracted fossil fuels on the global climate. The two fields hold combined reserves of some 875 million barrels of oil equivalent.

"The court's conclusion is that the decisions on the plan for the development and operation of petroleum deposits for Breidablikk, Yggdrasil and Tyrving are invalid," said the ruling by Judge Lena Skjold Rafoss. 

"An impact assessment ensures that dissenting voices are heard and considered, and that the decision-making basis is verifiable and available to the public," it added. 

According to the court, future emissions should have been assessed as part of the approval process, in-line with its decision in the famous Norwegian Arctic Oil case of 2020. 

The Norwegian government won the case against environmental groups that wanted the courts to block the government from issuing licenses to oil and gas companies to explore the south and southeast areas of the Barents Sea for petroleum.

The latest ruling, however, makes it clear that the verdict applies to these three recently approved fields only "and not to other activity on the Norwegian continental shelf". Still, it could set a precedent for new fields.

"This is a full and complete victory for the climate over Norway," Greenpeace Norway head Frode Pleym told Reuters.


By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News