• 3 minutes This Battery Uses Up CO2 to Create Energy
  • 5 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 9 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 12 minutes Historian Slams Greta. I Don't See Her in Beijing or Delhi.
  • 5 hours Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 2 hours Demand for Diesel vs. Oil
  • 16 hours Which type of Hegemony will China follow
  • 8 hours Yesterday POLEXIT started (Poles do not want to leave EU, but Poland made the decisive step towards becoming dictatorship, in breach of accession treaty)
  • 1 day Here is Why People Lose Money Trading Natural Gas
  • 2 days Governments that wasted massive windfalls
  • 9 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 23 hours Tesla Will ‘Disappear’ Or ‘Lose 80%’ Of Its Value
  • 1 day Let’s take a Historical walk around the Rig
  • 1 day US Shale: Technology
  • 2 days We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 2 days 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019

Breaking News:

Oil Prices Rise On Surprise Crude Draw

Why $40 Oil Is A Real Possibility

Why $40 Oil Is A Real Possibility

Oil prices have fallen significantly…

Why Did Haftar Turn Libya’s Oil Off?

Why Did Haftar Turn Libya’s Oil Off?

General Haftar is in the…

Alberta Oil Industry Faces “Extraordinary” Challenge

Calgary

Alberta’s oil producers are facing an extraordinary challenge caused by pipeline bottlenecks combined with growing production, Scotiabank Economics said in a report released this week.

The bottlenecks could pressure the industry’s 2019 earnings by as much as US$11.33-29.45 billion (C$15-39 billion), the bank said, and government revenues could suffer a loss of between US$1.13 billion (C$1.5 billion) and US3.1 billion (C$4.1 billion).

This scenario, the bank said, factored in all other relevant circumstances remaining equal, with the only variable being pipeline capacity. With adequate capacity, Scotiabank’s analysts said, these losses will not be borne.

However, the bank is wary about a proposal from the industry to have the government order a production cut to alleviate pressure on what pipeline capacity there is. “The bar for the government to intervene directly into the energy sector should be a high one and the policy option should only be considered in an effort to prevent extreme value destruction,” Scotiabank said.

What’s more, it seems even a production cut wouldn’t make it possible to avoid all the losses that would otherwise be incurred. It would only reduce them. The potential reduction could be substantial, though: Scotiabank estimates the range of loses avoided at US$2.27-20.4 billion (C$3-27 billion).

The bank went on to say it actually expected that the huge discount at which Western Canadian heavy has been trading to West Texas Intermediate would narrow in 2019. “If discounts fall back, as we expect,” the bank said, “to a more moderate level in 2019, the pay-off of government intervention is likely to be too small to justify the policy action; however, if discounts remain wide around current level, the action could be justified given the magnitude of potential upstream earnings and royalty revenue losses.”

Earlier this week, the chief executive of Cenovus called for government intervention in crude oil production in Alberta to counter the sinking prices. Not everyone among the producers, however, is on board with this, but Premier Rachel Notley said the provincial government is discussing all options, including intervention.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Mike Kom on November 26 2018 said:
    This is just dreadful news for Brooks, The Armpit Of Alberta. Heh, heh....

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play