• 8 minutes U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 13 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 16 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 3 hours Knoema: Crude Oil Price Forecast: 2018, 2019 and Long Term to 2030
  • 11 hours Nuclear Pact/Cold War: Moscow Wants U.S. To Explain Planned Exit From Arms Treaty
  • 11 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 11 hours Merkel Aims To Ward Off Diesel Car Ban In Germany
  • 3 hours Get on Those Bicycles to Save the World
  • 10 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 7 hours Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 1 day Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 1 day Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 18 hours Long-Awaited Slowdown in China Exports Still Isn’t Happening
  • 5 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 21 hours Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
Alt Text

Gold Exploration Still Profitable When Done Right

While most mining investment in…

Alt Text

The World Has Never Seen A Mining Exploration Scheme Like This

India’s mining and exploration sector…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

This Mining Giant Is Cutting Itself In Half

Big news this week from one of the world's premier mining firms. Suggesting that the sector is coming under pressure to reduce costs by all means possible.

The company is BHP Billiton. Which said that it will split its cross-commodity project portfolio into two distinct groups.

This division will be accomplished by spinning out certain commodities into a new company. Including aluminum, coal, manganese, nickel and silver.

BHP itself will retain control of assets in petroleum, iron ore, copper and potash.

The stated rationale for the de-merger is to "simplify" operations, reduce costs and improve productivity. An interesting angle for the miner to be taking in the current industry environment.

Such asset splits are often carried out in order to create "pure plays". With the theory being investors are more likely to embrace straight-up bets on commodities of interest, such as gold or copper.

But given the stated portfolio division here, it's clear neither of the new entities qualify as pure plays. Leading to the conclusion that the arrangement must be primarily aimed at cost savings and operational efficiency.

It will be interesting to see if either end can be achieved. Given that the resulting two portfolios are both still fairly large and diverse.

One distinction that may help in this regard is asset size. With BHP specifying that the company-proper will retain large, long-life mines.

This may indicate the operational division is likely to be between "steady and reliable" big mines and "other" projects, going forward.

The move may thus actually be a vote on where BHP feels its core value lies. With all other "afterthought" projects being stripped away as distractions.

Here's to making it purer,

Dave Forest




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News