• 9 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 19 minutes Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 1 hour Downloadable 3D Printed Gun Designs, Yay or Nay?
  • 3 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 hours Rattling With Weapons: Iran Must Develop Military To Guard Against Other Powers
  • 8 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 5 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 55 mins China goes against US natural gas
  • 9 hours CO2 Emissions Hit 67-Year Low In USA, As Rest-Of-World Rises
  • 4 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 17 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 18 hours The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 20 hours How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 11 hours Saudi PIF In Talks To Invest In Tesla Rival Lucid
  • 12 hours Film on Venezuela's staggering collapse
Alt Text

Ecuador Hoping To Attract $1.5 Billion Investment In Mining Sector

Ecuador’s Minister for Strategic Sectors…

Alt Text

The Next Big Thing In Enhanced Oil Recovery

Savvy energy investors are constantly…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

This Mining Giant Is Cutting Itself In Half

Big news this week from one of the world's premier mining firms. Suggesting that the sector is coming under pressure to reduce costs by all means possible.

The company is BHP Billiton. Which said that it will split its cross-commodity project portfolio into two distinct groups.

This division will be accomplished by spinning out certain commodities into a new company. Including aluminum, coal, manganese, nickel and silver.

BHP itself will retain control of assets in petroleum, iron ore, copper and potash.

The stated rationale for the de-merger is to "simplify" operations, reduce costs and improve productivity. An interesting angle for the miner to be taking in the current industry environment.

Such asset splits are often carried out in order to create "pure plays". With the theory being investors are more likely to embrace straight-up bets on commodities of interest, such as gold or copper.

But given the stated portfolio division here, it's clear neither of the new entities qualify as pure plays. Leading to the conclusion that the arrangement must be primarily aimed at cost savings and operational efficiency.

It will be interesting to see if either end can be achieved. Given that the resulting two portfolios are both still fairly large and diverse.

One distinction that may help in this regard is asset size. With BHP specifying that the company-proper will retain large, long-life mines.

This may indicate the operational division is likely to be between "steady and reliable" big mines and "other" projects, going forward.

The move may thus actually be a vote on where BHP feels its core value lies. With all other "afterthought" projects being stripped away as distractions.

Here's to making it purer,

Dave Forest




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News