• 1 day Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 1 day Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 2 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 2 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 2 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 2 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 2 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 2 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 2 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 2 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 3 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 3 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 3 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 3 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 3 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 3 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 3 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 4 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 4 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 4 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 4 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 4 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 5 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 5 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 5 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 5 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 5 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 5 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 5 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 5 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 5 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 6 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 6 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 6 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 6 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
  • 6 days Iran Denies Involvement In Bahrain Oil Pipeline Blast
  • 8 days The Oil Rig Drilling 10 Miles Under The Sea
  • 8 days Baghdad Agrees To Ship Kirkuk Oil To Iran
  • 9 days Another Group Joins Niger Delta Avengers’ Ceasefire Boycott
  • 9 days Italy Looks To Phase Out Coal-Fired Electricity By 2025
Alt Text

Will Ecuador’s Mining Sector Return To Its Golden Days?

Despite the recent political problems…

Alt Text

Gold Prices Could Spike As India Resumes Imports

Gold purchases in India imploded…

Spot the Difference Between These Giant Gold Deposits

Spot the Difference Between These Giant Gold Deposits

Very interesting data points this week on two of the world's largest gold projects.

First, the negative. In Alaska, major producer Anglo American announced it is pulling out of the Pebble gold-copper project. Anglo is writing down $300 million spent on the project since 2007 and walking away.

Contrast this with (possibly) positive news from the massive Minas Conga gold-copper deposit in Peru.

Peruvian Mines and Energy Minister Jorge Merino said at a recent mining conference that round table discussions with dissident residents near the deposit may be making headway. Potentially paving the way for its owners (including gold major Newmont) to develop the stalled project.

Interesting that we have one major throwing in the towel while another appears to be persevering. What does this tell us about the current project development environment?

Both Pebble and Conga are world-class geologically. Pebble is probably the world's largest undeveloped gold deposit. Conga is likely in the top ten.

Both are controversial. Vigorous protests have been a material impediment to development, costing owners time and money.

Here's one difference that may explain the differing tack of each project's big player: infrastructure.

Conga is located in the shadow of the massive Yanacocha mining district. Newmont has stated it plans to "leverage existing operations" here to help with capital and operating costs.

Pebble by contrast, is hundreds of kilometres from major road infrastructure. And distant from any significant mining operations.

Is this factor causing one project to shovel on while the other is shelved? There's no way to know for sure. Perhaps Anglo American and Newmont have different world views. Or maybe it's other interveners like local costs or permitting environment.

But in the current mining downturn it's interesting to see which projects are emerging as the survivors. There's a lot of talk today about cost management and rationalization. You'd think that in such an environment, good infrastructure would be climbing the "most desired" list for developers.

Here's to being in the right place at the right time,

By. Dave Forest




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Gordon Steingart on September 20 2013 said:
    The Pebble project was doomed many years ago. Teck Resources once owned it and very correctly abandoned it. It's a good sales pitch by Hunter Dickinson,imo. Buy Northern Dynasty stock because ; Pebble is the Largest gold and copper resource in the world in mining friendly Alaska . Anglo American as a 50% partner sewed up the deal. Just buy NAK and wait .

    Then later,we find tailings ponds could destroy a fishery ,which could lead to multiple problems for the area and beyond. Extremely low grade means a lot of waste.
    Alaska has plenty of mining opportunity ,I guess they can live without that one ,despite its size.

    I think Hunter Dickinson really believed the Pebble could work, but in case it didn't ,issuing ,then at high priced times with promotion in full gear , having insiders selling shares and having salaries paid for many years has likely been beneficial to Northern Dynasty and Hunter Dickinson people. The real losers are the retail investors.
    I'm surprised Anglo American ever bought in. They must have realized the potential for failure was very high. After all ,they are pro's. I'm not surprised at all that this project is likely shelved permanently.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News