• 3 minutes Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 6 minutes This Battery Uses Up CO2 to Create Energy
  • 10 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 12 minutes Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 9 hours Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 2 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 1 hour Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 10 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 6 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 1 day Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 1 day Wind Turbine Blades Not Recyclable
  • 1 day China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 1 day Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 1 hour Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 1 day Denmark gets 47% of its electricity from wind in 2019
  • 9 hours US Shale: Technology
Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Premium Content

Platinum, Gold And Coal Prices Could Be Impacted By South Africa’s “26% Rule”

The national government this week released a key policy review. Looking at how “black economic empowerment” (BEE) rules have been implemented by the mining sector.

One of the biggest outcomes from the report was continued controversy over the “26% rule”. Which states that black interests in the country must control at least 26% of South African mining firms. Related: Energy Stocks May Be A Safe Haven For U.S. Investors

The problem, according to the report, has been the implementation of this rule. With officials pointing out that some miners have achieved 26% black ownership for a short period — but then slipped back below the threshold percentage after BEE shareholders sold their equity in the company.

Mining firms contend that such selling is beyond their control. And that they should be considered to have met BEE obligations so long as they initially come in above the 26% threshold — regardless of what happens to shareholdings afterward. Related: Why Putin Doesn’t Need To Pander To The West

The government sees it differently. Saying that miners should be required to maintain 26% BEE ownership at all times.

Officials from both the government and mining groups say there is still “no consensus” on how to resolve this issue. And so the South African Chamber of Mines has agreed to approach the courts, along with state regulators, to ask for a final decision.

The government noted that a court judgment on the issue could come down as early as April. Which will be a critical shift for the mining industry here. Related: Is Warren Buffett Wrong About Oil Stocks?

If judges do uphold the government’s position, it will be one more burden for miners to bear. Companies will be forced to find a way to maintain a perpetual 26% BEE ownership — which could mean giving discounted shares to applicable holders, or implementing other financial strategies.

The bottom line is that corporate costs would go up. At a time when the South African industry is already battling high production costs, and low metals prices. Watch for a decision from the courts over the coming weeks — it could have important implications for commodities like platinum, gold and coal.

Here’s to maintaining control,

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play