• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 15 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 6 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 21 mins Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 2 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 15 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 1 hour Why hydrogen economics does not work
  • 5 hours Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 11 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 1 day Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 1 day Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 1 day Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 1 day Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 1 day Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 10 hours Saudi Arabia Cuts Diplomatic Ties with Canada
Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

One Big Player Says Buy, Another Sell For This Shale

Somewhat differing opinions on Canada's Montney shale of late.

Established Montney player Progress Energy (owned by Malaysian major Petronas) called a buy on the play last week. Agreeing to pony up $1.5 billion to buy additional acreage in the play from exiting producer Talisman Energy.

But another Canadian mid-tier says the play is a sell. Enerplus Resources, who last week announced it is offloading 33,300 acres in the Montney to an unnamed buyer. (The firm is redeploying the sale proceeds into U.S. shales, buying 17,000 acres in the Marcellus.)

Why the difference of opinions on the play? The answer appears to come down to one word: liquids.

Enerplus CEO Ian Dundas cited lower-than-expected natural gas liquids (NGLs) content as a big reason for his company's exit. Dundas noted that the acreage had yielded mainly dry gas.

Progress CEO Michael Culbert told a different story in discussing his Montney acquisition. Culbert noted that a significant content of liquids like propane and butane was a big reason why Progress is going "all-in" on the play.

The differing assessments show the evolving state of Canada's shale plays.

Previously we had blanket excitement over big shale packages like the Montney, Duvernay and Horn River.

Now we're seeing that not all shale is created equal. Increased drilling in these plays is discovering different zones. Some areas are oil-prone. Some have dry gas. And some are in-betweens, with gas and associated NGLs.

With prices for oil and liquids running at historic highs compared to gas, producers are getting choosey. Dry gas acreage is being offloaded. Liquids-rich gas is in demand.

Given the impact of high-value liquids on well economics, this stance makes sense. It also means that some shale acreage is going to get more valuable. While other ground grows less so.

A final interesting note on this one. Even though dry gas may be getting low valuations, it is seeing some love. An unnamed buyer stumped up $130 million for the Enerplus ground--even though it's known to be devoid of liquids.

Begs the question: who are they, and what do they see ahead for gas prices that others don't?

Here's to liquids and gases,

By. Dave Forest




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News