• 5 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 8 minutes Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 11 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 16 minutes Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 7 mins *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 1 day U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Weighs Lifting Tariffs On China
  • 7 hours Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 17 hours Connection Between Climate Rules And German's No-Limit Autobahns? Strange, But It Exists
  • 3 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 6 hours Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 22 hours Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 22 hours Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
  • 1 day UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 2 days What will Saudi Arabia say? Booming Qatar-Turkey Trade To Hit $2 bn For 2018
  • 1 day Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 2 days German Carmakers Warning: Hard Brexit Would Be "Fatal"
Alt Text

How To Play A Recovery In Oil Prices?

A realistic correction in the…

Alt Text

This Supermajor Is Leading The Energy Sector

This supermajor has been standing…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

How To Save $100 Million In A Commodities Downturn

The recent decline in commodities prices has stung a lot of companies and investors.

But at least one firm is now benefitting from the downturn in the resources sector.

That's Chinese miner MMG. Which said this week that lower metals prices and a cooler commodities industry will make development of new projects a lot cheaper.

Australian press reported that MMG expects to save a significant amount on building its Dugald River zinc, lead and silver mine in Queensland. Perhaps as a much as $100 million. Related: Ongoing Security Concerns In Kurdistan Have Oil Companies On Edge

That's because of costs for things like labor. Which--combined with other capital items at Dugald River--had originally added up to a projected capital cost of $1.5 billion for the project, when it was first planned in 2012.

MMG's management however, felt that figure was inflated because of the booming Australian resources sector. Which in 2012 was being lifted by hot markets for commodities like iron ore and coal.

Because of the cost pressures at the time, MMG put the development of Dugald River on hold. Where it remained until this week, when the company made a formal go-ahead decision on the building of the new mine. Related: Warren Buffett And Elon Musk To Spark A Lithium Boom

And waiting those three years has had a significant effect on costs. With the projected $1.5 billion price tag for the mine now having been reduced to $1.4 billion -- for a savings of $100 million.

Management attributes the reduction in costs directly to the downturn in mining. Saying that today it is finding "A-team" workers and contractors for the project -- where, during the 2012 boom, only "B-grade construction people" were available. Related: Long-Predicted U.S. Shale Production Collapse May Not Materialize Yet

The company said that having such seasoned workers is leading to greater efficiency. A factor that is directly responsible for reducing capital costs.

If the costs here do come in as projected, it will be some of the first evidence that inflationary pressures in the mining business are subsiding. Which would be great news for the profitability of firms still moving forward with new projects.

Here's to the A-Team,

By Dave Forest

More Top Reads Of Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News