• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 19 mins Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 1 day NYT: Mass Immigration Roundups in U.S. to Start Sunday
  • 2 hours White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 7 hours Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 1 hour Excellent Choice: Germany's Von der Leyen Secures Powerful EU Executive Top Job
  • 3 hours Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 20 hours Carrot And Stick: North Korea Suggests It Might Lift Weapons Test moratorium
  • 17 hours South Korea imports No Oil From Iran in June - First-Half Imports Fall 37%
  • 4 hours Starlink Internet Courtesy of Tesla
  • 7 hours A Silence is heard
  • 13 hours Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 2 days U.S.- Taiwan: China Says Will Freeze Out U.S. Companies That Sell Arms To Taiwan
  • 21 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
Alt Text

This Supermajor Is Leading The Energy Sector

This supermajor has been standing…

Alt Text

How To Play A Recovery In Oil Prices?

A realistic correction in the…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Premium Content

Here's Another Sign Uranium Prices Are Too Low

The recent rally in uranium prices appears to have stalled. With spot rates for uranium oxide taking their first drop last week since June--down $1 per pound to $35.50.

That ends a run that had seen the metal rise from as low as $28 over the summer. Leaving prices still at very low levels compared to rates seen over the last 10 years.

And that's having a notable effect on production across the uranium mining industry, judging from a key announcement last week from one of the biggest firms in the space.

Related: New Nuclear Fuel Rod Could Increase Output Of Existing Plants

The player in question is France's Areva. Which said that current uranium prices are too low to go ahead with one of the company's major development projects globally: the Kiggavik uranium deposit in Canada's northern Nunavut Territory.

Last week Areva announced that it has submitted a final environmental impact statement to local Nunavut authorities for a potential mine at Kiggavik. A key step in moving the project toward production.

But in the same news release, Areva said that uranium prices are too low to "favour a construction decision" for the project. Leaving the timing of mine building here uncertain.

The interesting thing is that Kiggavik is one of the best uranium development projects in the world right now. Especially outside of Canada's high-grade Athabasca Basin.

Related: We Haven't Seen This in Uranium For Years

All told, the project hosts a massive resource of 130 million pounds of uranium oxide--at a grade of 0.23% uranium, one of the highest for any development project globally.

But even with these leading metrics, Kiggavik still appears to be a no-go at current uranium prices. Implying that few other projects are going to be economic in today's industry environment.

That's a challenge for the business. And a positive signal for investors--when a sector can't afford to bring on new supply, it's usually only a matter of time until supply starts to run short.

Here's to getting things built,

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play