• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 21 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 5 days Does Toyota Know Something That We Don’t?
  • 5 days World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 1 day America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 7 days China is using Chinese Names of Cities on their Border with Russia.
  • 8 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 8 days OPINION: Putin’s Genocidal Myth A scholarly treatise on the thousands of years of Ukrainian history. RCW
  • 8 days CHINA Economy IMPLODING - Fastest Price Fall in 14 Years & Stock Market Crashes to 5 Year Low
  • 7 days CHINA Economy Disaster - Employee Shortages, Retirement Age, Birth Rate & Ageing Population
  • 8 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
  • 8 days "(Another) Putin Critic 'Falls' Out Of Window, Dies"
  • 9 days United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 9 days Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs
Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Premium Content

Does This Critical Shift In Conflict Minerals Law Affect You?

One of the biggest legal shifts in the mining business recently has been conflict minerals law in the U.S.

And this week, the rules took another major turn.

That's because of a ruling from the Washington, D.C. Circuit court on Tuesday. Which struck down large swathes of new rules that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been trying to impose around conflict minerals.

Those rules have been evolving since 2010 -- when Dodd-Frank legislation mandated the SEC to take a harder line on conflict materials. With the backbone being forced disclosure about the sources for minerals produced and processed by SEC-registered companies. Related: Oil Prices Must Rebound. Here’s Why

But the D.C. Circuit said this week there's a big problem with those rules. Namely, they force companies to act against the First Amendment right to free speech.

The three-judge panel said in a divided opinion that forcing companies to disclose potential issues in their operations is contrary to the principals of free speech. Related: Fresh Sell Off For Oil. Bear Market Here To Stay?

The judges also noted that the heavy financial burden imposed on companies for conflict reporting was unlikely to reduce the humanitarian problems that prompted the legislation.

For the time being then, it looks as if the burden of conflict reporting will be reduced. Which will give a financial and administrative lift to companies operating in scrutinized locations like the Democratic Republic of Congo. Related: Hungry Venezuela Eyes $40 Billion Offshore Discovery In Guyana

The saga is far from over though. With challenges expected from the SEC and other parties -- who argue that securities law allows compelled disclosure of financials and other business matters, so why not mineral sourcing information.

It's likely this contentious matter will now end up before the U.S. Supreme Court over the coming months. Watch for news on specific cases -- which could have a big impact on the resource business globally.

Here's to resolving the conflict,

ADVERTISEMENT

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News