• 5 minutes Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 8 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 14 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 17 minutes Could Tesla Buy GM?
  • 1 hour Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 28 mins OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 9 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 30 mins Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 13 mins And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 3 hours Alberta Cuts Push Prices Too High
  • 2 days End of EV Subsidies?
  • 23 hours Congrats: 4 journalists and a newspaper are Time’s Person of the Year
  • 24 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 20 hours USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 1 day Permian Suicide
  • 2 days GOODBYE FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE!!

Breaking News:

Virus That Haunted Aramco In 2012 Is Back

Alt Text

How To Play A Recovery In Oil Prices?

A realistic correction in the…

Alt Text

Aramco’s “Acquisition Hit List”

As Saudi Arabia prepares for…

Dave Forest

Dave Forest

Dave is Managing Geologist of the Pierce Points Daily E-Letter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Does This Critical Shift In Conflict Minerals Law Affect You?

One of the biggest legal shifts in the mining business recently has been conflict minerals law in the U.S.

And this week, the rules took another major turn.

That's because of a ruling from the Washington, D.C. Circuit court on Tuesday. Which struck down large swathes of new rules that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been trying to impose around conflict minerals.

Those rules have been evolving since 2010 -- when Dodd-Frank legislation mandated the SEC to take a harder line on conflict materials. With the backbone being forced disclosure about the sources for minerals produced and processed by SEC-registered companies. Related: Oil Prices Must Rebound. Here’s Why

But the D.C. Circuit said this week there's a big problem with those rules. Namely, they force companies to act against the First Amendment right to free speech.

The three-judge panel said in a divided opinion that forcing companies to disclose potential issues in their operations is contrary to the principals of free speech. Related: Fresh Sell Off For Oil. Bear Market Here To Stay?

The judges also noted that the heavy financial burden imposed on companies for conflict reporting was unlikely to reduce the humanitarian problems that prompted the legislation.

For the time being then, it looks as if the burden of conflict reporting will be reduced. Which will give a financial and administrative lift to companies operating in scrutinized locations like the Democratic Republic of Congo. Related: Hungry Venezuela Eyes $40 Billion Offshore Discovery In Guyana

The saga is far from over though. With challenges expected from the SEC and other parties -- who argue that securities law allows compelled disclosure of financials and other business matters, so why not mineral sourcing information.

It's likely this contentious matter will now end up before the U.S. Supreme Court over the coming months. Watch for news on specific cases -- which could have a big impact on the resource business globally.

Here's to resolving the conflict,

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News